Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 676–681 | Cite as

Surface energy and chemical characteristics of interfaces of adhesively bonded aluminium joints

  • G. Kim
  • F. Ajersch


The deleterious effects of water on the physico-chemical aspects of the durability of adhesively bonded aluminium joints has been investigated. Emphasis was placed on analytical techniques that lead to the better understanding of changes induced at the metal/epoxy interface by the presence of water. Analytical techniques such as contact angle measurements, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction were practical in obtaining information on the chemical composition and structure of the samples. Chemical conversion-coated samples were found to be much more stable in wet conditions compared to samples without conversion coating. The surface structure on the adherend, after extensive immersion times, was found to consist of a compact layer of bayerite with traces of gibbsite. The calculations of interfacial energy, γsl, and work of adhesion in dry and wet conditions, WA and WAl were carried out to evaluate the maximum bond strength. It was found that the durability of the bond in the presence of water was quite high for the XD4300/6061-T6 joint systems.


Contact Angle Bond Strength Chemical Characteristic Interfacial Energy Angle Measurement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. J. Kinloch, “Durability of Structural Adhesives” (Applied Science, London, 1983).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. W. Eeicher and W. E. Sshowalter, Forest Products Laboratory Report 1813 (1950).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. S. Kabayashi and D. J. Donnelly, Boeing Co. Report DG-41517 (February 1974).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. F. A. Bijlmer, J. Adhesion 5 (1973) 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. H. Kaelble, ibid. 2 (1970) 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Idem, “Physical Chemistry of Adhesion” (Wiley, New York, 1971) Chs 5 and 13.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Levine, G. Jlkka and P. Weiss, Polym. Lett. 2 (1964) 915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. L. Mittal, “Polymer Science Technology“, Vol. 9A (Plenum Press, New York, 1975) pp. 129–68.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. A. Dyckerhoff and P. J. Steel, Angew. Makromol. Chem. 21 (1972) 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. A. Gledhill and A. J. Kinloch, J. Adhesion 6 (1974) 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. A. Dukes and A. J. Kinloch, in “Adhesion Science and Technology”, edited by L. H. Lee (Plenum Press, New York, 1975) p. 597.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Carre and J. Schultz, J. Adhesion 15 (1983) 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. J. Kinloch and N. R. Smart, ibid. 12 (1981) 29.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. D. Davis, T. S. Sun, J. S. Ahearn and J. D. Venables, J. Mater. Sci. 17 (1982) 1807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Raupach, Aust. J. Soil Res. 1 (1963) 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. Brosset, Acta Chem. Scand. 6 (1952) 910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. D. Hem and C. E. Roberson, “Form and Stability of Aluminum Hydroxide Complexes in Dilute Solution” (United States Government Printing Office, Washington, 1967).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Kim
    • 1
  • F. Ajersch
    • 1
  1. 1.Département de métallurgie et de génie des matériauxécole PolytechniqueMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations