Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 28, Issue 17, pp 4749–4761 | Cite as

The effects of matrix microcracking on the oxidation behaviour of carbon-fibre/glass-matrix composites

  • R. G. Iacocca
  • D. J. Duquette


Carbon-fibre/glass-matrix composites were fabricated using Fortafil fibres and two different glass matrices: a sodium-borosilicate glass (CGW 7740), and a calcium-aluminosilicate glass (CGW 1723). Upon cooling from the hot-pressing temperature used to fabricate the composites (approximately 1250°C), the glass matrices cracked due to differences in the coefficients of thermal expansion between the fibres and the matrix. At elevated temperatures these cracks serve as short-circuit diffusion paths for oxygen transport, and the majority of the weight loss from the cracked samples was caused by oxygen diffusing along these microcracks and reacting with the fibres. Because of the relatively large diameter of these cracks compared to the mean free path for diffusing oxygen, traditional gas kinetics can be applied to the various transport processes occurring in the oxidation reactions, and there is no need to allow for capillary size or to apply Knüdsen diffusion. The composites made of 1723 glass exhibited linear relationships between specific-mass loss (Δ mass/initial exposed surface area of carbon fibres) and time at all oxidation temperatures (450, 500, 550 and 600 °C). With the 7740 composites, a parabolic relationship between specific-mass loss and time was obtained. As the oxidation temperature approached or exceeded the glass-transition temperature, Tg, for the 7740 composites (560 °C), this parabolic relationship became more pronounced. Microstructural evidence revealed that at temperatures near or exceeding the Tg for the 7740 glass the microcracks in the matrix heal, thereby decreasing the amount of fibre surface area available for chemical reaction. Because the rate of oxidation is directly proportional to the amount of available fibre-surface area, the weight-loss data appear parabolic with time. Additionally, the mechanism for the oxidation of the carbon fibres does not appear to change once the fibres are placed in a glass matrix. The apparent activation energy for oxidation remained constant at approximately 174 kJ mol−1.


Carbon Fibre Apparent Activation Energy Oxidation Temperature Exposed Surface Area Glass Matrice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    I. Crivelli-Visconti and G. A. Cooper, Nature 221 (1969) 754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. A. J. Sambell, D. G. Bower and D. C. Phillips, J. Mater. Sci. 7 (1972) 663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. A. J. Sambell, A. Briggs, D. C. Phillips and D. H. Bowen, J. Mater. Sci. 7 (1972) 676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. C. Phillips, F. A. J. Sambell and D. H. Bowen, J. Mater. Sci. 7 (1972) 1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. R. Levitt, J. Mater. Sci. 8 (1973) 793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. M. Prewo, Mater. Sci. Res. 20 (1986) 529.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Fitzner, A. Gkogkidis and M. Heine, High Temperatures-High Pressures 16 (1984) 363.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. K. Chawla, J. Met. 35(3) (1983) 82.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. C. Bennett, D. J. Johnson and W. Johnson, J. Mater. Sci. 8 (1983) 3337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. J. Johnson, Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, Vol.20, edited by P. A. Thrower (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1987) p. 1.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. L. Butler and R. J. Diefendorf, in Papers of the 9th Conference on Carbon, June 16–20, 1969, Boston, MA (American Carbon Society, University Park, PA, 1969) p. 45.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. J. Wicks and R. A. Coyle, J. Mater. Sci. 11 (1976) 376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. P. Bansal and R. H. Doremus, “Handbook of glass properties” (Academic Press, Orlando, 1986) pp. 32–37.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. M. Prewo, J. J. Brennan and G. K. Layden, Ceram. Bull. 65(5) (1986) 305.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. H. Eckstein, “The weight loss of carbon fibres in circulating air”, 18th International SAMPE Biennial Conference, 7–9 October 1986, Seattle, Washington (SAMPE, Covina, CA, 1986) p. 149.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. B. Barr and B. H. Eckstein, “The oxidation of carbon fibres in air”, Extended Abstract of the 18th Biennial Conference on Carbon (Worcester, MA, 1987).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clyde H. Sheppard, “Thermal and oxidative stability of carbon fibres and composites”, 18th International SAMPE Technical Conference, 7–9 October, 1986, Seattle, Washington (SAMPE Covina, CA, 1986) pp. 142–148.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Y. Oishi, R. Terai and H. Ueda, “Mass transport phenomenon in ceramics”, edited by A. R. Cooper and A. H. Heuer (Plenum, New York, 1975) p. 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. H. Geiger and D. R. Poirier, “Transport phenomena in metallurgy” (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1973) pp. 464–469.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. G. Iacocca
    • 1
  • D. J. Duquette
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Materials EngineeringRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations