Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 28, Issue 17, pp 4578–4582 | Cite as

Temperature dependence of the amount of transformed Fe particles in a Cu-1.5-mass% Fe alloy

  • Y. Watanabe
  • Y. Takada
  • H. Miura
  • M. Kato
  • A. Sato
Papers

Abstract

The temperature dependence of the amount of martensitic transformation in Cu-1.5-mass% Fe has been examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and magnetic measurements. It was found that the temperature dependence of the amount of deformation-induced martensite for smaller (< 160 nm) Fe particles exhibits a maximum at a transition temperature. The transition temperature increases as the mean transformable-particle size increases. The evolution of the transition has been explained by incorporating the effect of paramagnetic to anti-ferromagnetic transitions in the γ-phase into thermodynamic considerations.

Keywords

Polymer Microscopy Electron Microscopy Transmission Electron Microscopy Martensite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. M. Denney, Acta Metall. 4 (1956) 586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. B. Newkirk, Trans. AIME 209 (1957) 1214.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. C. Abrahams, L. Guttman and J. S. Kasper, Phys. Rev. 127 (1962) 2052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    U. Gonser, C. J. Meechan, A. H. Muir and H. Wiedersich, J. Appl. Phys. 34 (1963) 2373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. J. Johanson, M. B. McGirr and D. A. Weeler, Phys. Rev. B 1 (1970) 3208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Kakeshita, H. Shirai, K. Shimizu, K. Sugiyama, K. Hazumi and M. Date, Trans. JIM 29 (1988) 553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Monzen, A. Sato and T. Mori, Trans. JIM 22 (1981) 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Watanabe, M. Kato and A. Sato, J. Mater. Sci. 26 (1991) 4307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Ishikawa and A. Sato, Phil. Mag. A 64 (1991) 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. J. Weiss and K. J. Tauer, Phys. Rev. 102 (1956) 1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. H. Johansson, Arch. Eisenhüttenw. 11 (1937) 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Zener, Trans. AIME 167 (1946) 513.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. C. Fisher, Metals Trans. 185 (1949) 688.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. Kaufman and M. Cohen, Prog. Metal Phys. 7 (1958) 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Sato, E. Chishima, Y. Yamaji and T. Mori, Acta Metall. 32 (1984) 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Watanabe
    • 1
  • Y. Takada
    • 2
  • H. Miura
    • 3
  • M. Kato
    • 4
  • A. Sato
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Metallurgical EngineeringHokkaido UniversityHokkaidoJapan
  2. 2.NKK CompanyHiroshimaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical and Control EngineeringUniversity of Electro-CommunicationsTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringTokyo Institute of TechnologyYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations