Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 1545–1550 | Cite as

Hybrid C/Pet/epoxy composites

  • A. Andonova
  • G. Bogoeva-Gaceva
  • B. Mangovska
  • M. Avella
  • E. Martuscelli


Hybrid carbon/PET/epoxy composites were prepared by a wet layup technique and characterized by standard methods of fracture and impact tests. The influence of PET fibre surface treatment with polyfunctional amine on the composite properties has been studied in order to determine the role of the fibre/matrix interface. The state of the fibre/matrix interface has been examined by several techniques, such as SEM, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and contact angle measurements. A significant hybrid effect of the PET/aminated fibres on the curing reaction and Tg of the epoxy matrix in the composites was established. It is probably due to the reaction between the amine groups of the fibre surface and the epoxy component of the resin, as determined by DSC.


Epoxy Differential Scanning Calorimetry Contact Angle Material Processing Surface Treatment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    B. Z. Jang, Compos. Sci. Technol. 34 (1989) 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. K. Shih and B. Z. Jang, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 8 (1989) 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Z. Jang, Polymer Compos. 11 (1990) 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Z. Hang, J. Panus and B. I. Valaire, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 10 (1991) 356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. L. Hancox, “Fibre Composite Hybrid Materials”, (Applied Science, London, 1981) p. 91.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Bunsell and B. Harris, Composites 5(4) (1974) 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. Mangovska, A. Andonova and G. Bogoevagaceva, in “The 4th European Polymer Federation Symposium on Polymeric Materials”, Baden Baden, Germany (1992) p. 151.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Avny and L. Rebenfield, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 32 (1986) 4009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Fukatsu, ibid. 45 (1992) 2037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. S. Ellison, L. D. Fisher and K. W. Alger, ibid. 27 (1982) 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. F. Grenier and P. Grenier, Polymer 33 (1992) 1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. David, G. Pleizer and Y. Peslandes, Compos. Sci.Technol. 46 (1993) 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Greco and G. Ragosta, J. Mater. Sci. 23 (1988) 4171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Andonova
    • 1
  • G. Bogoeva-Gaceva
    • 1
  • B. Mangovska
    • 1
  • M. Avella
    • 2
  • E. Martuscelli
    • 2
  1. 1.University “Sv. Kiril i Metodij”, Faculty of Technology and MetallurgySkopjeMacedonia
  2. 2.Institute of Research and Technology of Plastic MaterialsArco FeliceItaly

Personalised recommendations