Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 1521–1528 | Cite as

A substructure characterizing parameter in creep

  • K. G. Samuel
  • S. L. Mannan
  • P. Rodriguez
  • V. M. Radhakrishnan


A substructure characterizing parameter which is the ratio of applied stress, σ, in creep test to yield stress, σYS, of the material at the test temperature is introduced. A correlation is found to exist between this parameter and the creep rate for the data obtained in the temperature range 820–975 K when the initial yield strength is modified by (i) introducing different amounts of prior cold work by two modes of deformation at room temperature in a type 316 LN stainless steel and (ii) grain size, chemistry and grain size variation in a type 316 stainless steel. The correlation was found to exist also for a Cr-Mo-V steel at 823 K, in which different yield strengths were due to different heat treatments. Minimum creep rate when plotted against the substructure characterizing parameter yields an exponent similar to Norton's creep exponent and it is postulated that the value of the exponent reflects on the type of substructure developed in creep. Another parameter σ/Fys where Fys is a function of the ratio of the yield strength of a given microstructure to that of a reference microstructure (zero cold work for cold worked material, largest grain size when the microstructure variation is through grain size and solution annealed microstructure among heat treatments) also gives a unique correlation with the minimum creep rate at a test temperature with the exponent identical to Norton's creep exponent.


Grain Size Microstructure Stainless Steel Heat Treatment Yield Strength 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. D. Parker and B. Wilshire, Met. Sci. J. 9 (1975) 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. A. Miller, Mater. Sci. Engng 54 (1982) 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. A. Miller, W.J. Plumbridge and R.A. Bartlett, Met. Sci. J. 15 (1981) 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. A. Stevens and P. E. O. Flewitt, Acta Metall. 29 (1981) 867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. E. Evans and G. Knowles, ibid. 25 (1977) 693.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Purushothaman and J. K. Tien, ibid. 26 (1978) 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. W. Davies, G. Nelmes, K. R. Williams and B. Wilshire, Met. Sci. J. 7 (1973) 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Singh and S. Banerjee, Acta Metall. et Mater. 40 (1992) 2607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. R. Williams and B. Wilshire, Met. Sci. J. 7 (1973) 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. J. Evans and G. F. Harrison, ibid. 10 (1976) 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. W. Davis and B. Wilshire, Scripta Metall. 5 (1971) 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    O. Ajaja, Acta Metall. et Mater. 40 (1992) 2701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. H. Alden, Met. Trans. 8A (1977) 1857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. D. Mathew, S. Latha, S. L. Mannan and P. Rodriguez, Trans. Indian Inst. Metals 42 (Supplement) (1989) s181.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. J. Kestenbach, T. Luiz Da Silvena and S. N. Monteiro, Met. Trans. 7A (1976) 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. L. Mannan, PhD thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore (1981).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. D. Mathew, PhD Thesis, Madras University (1992).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    O. Ajaja and A. J. Ardell, in Proceeding of the 4th International Conference on Strength of Metals and Alloys. Nancy, Vol 2 (1976) p. 880.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    O. Ajaja and A. J. Ardell, Scripta Metall. 11 (1977) 1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Idem, Phil. Mag. 39 (1979) 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Idem, ibid. 39 (1979) 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Veeramani, K. Bhanu Sankara Rao, V. S. Sreenivasan, R. Sandhya and S. L. Mannan, Paper presented at the 46th Annual Technical Meeting of the Indian Institute of Metals, Udaipur, Nov 14–17 (1992).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    K. G. Samuel, S. L. Mannan and V. M. Radhakrishnan, Trans. Indian Inst. Metals 46 (1993) 157.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. L. Mannan and P. Rodriguez, Met. Sci. J. 17 (1983) 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. D. Mathew, S. Latha, G. Sasikala, S. L. Mannan and P. Rodriguez, Nucl. Technol. 81 (1988) 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. D. Mathew, S. Latha, G. Sasikala, S. L. Mannan and P. Rodriguez, Trans. Indian Inst. Metals. 42 (supplement) (1989) s175.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. G. Samuel
    • 1
  • S. L. Mannan
    • 1
  • P. Rodriguez
    • 1
  • V. M. Radhakrishnan
    • 2
  1. 1.Materials Development DivisionIndira Gandhi Centre for Atomic ResearchKalpakkamIndia
  2. 2.Department of Metallurgical EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyMadrasIndia

Personalised recommendations