Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 31, Issue 7, pp 1903–1907 | Cite as

Interface microstructure and reaction in Gr/Al metal matrix composites

  • Haining Yang
  • Mingyuan Gu
  • Weiji Jiang
  • Guoding Zhang


The interface structure in Gr/Al composites fabricated with liquid metal infiltration has been studied using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Morphologies of interfacial reaction product, aluminium carbide Al4C3, formed at different manufacturing parameters were compared and, the growth mechanism of the carbide was studied by means of high resolution electron microscopy (HREM). It has been shown that the morphology of the carbide is intimately related to the processing parameters with which the composites were produced. There are two kinds of interfaces between the carbide and the aluminium matrix. They have different growth mechanisms and relative growth rates under different growth driving forces. Several crystal orientation relationships between the carbide and the aluminium matrix have been observed.


Carbide Growth Mechanism Interfacial Reaction Relative Growth Rate Orientation Relationship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    H. Nayeb-Hashemi and J. Seyyedi, Metall. Trans. A 20A (1989) 727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. F. Amatean, J. Compos. Mater. 10 (1976) 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. P. Diwanji and I. W. Hall, J. Mater. Sci. 27 (1992) 2093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. J. Baker and W. Bonfield, ibid.13 (1978) 1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. A. Chemyshova and L. I. Kobeleva ibid.20 (1985) 3524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. C. Jr. Harrigan, Metall. Trans. A 9A (1978) 503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. J. Masson, K. Schulte, F. Girot and Y. Le Petitcorps, Mater Sci. Eng. A135 (1991) 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. D. Scott, R. L. Trumper and Ming Yang, Compos. Sci. Tech. 42 (1991) 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Yang and V. D. Scott, J. Mater. Sci. 26 (1991) 1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. H. Khan, Metall. Trans. 7A (1976) 1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Okura and H. Asanuma, Compos. Sci. Eng. 24 (1985) 243.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Min Nai-Ben, “Physical Basis of Crystal Growth” (Shanghai Science & Technical Pub., Shanghai, 1983) p. 434 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. A. Jeffrey and V. Y. Wu, Acta Crystallogr. 16 (1963) 559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen Rong, Doctoral Dissertation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University (1989) p. 71.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. F. Mondolfo, “Aluminium Alloys: Structures and Properties” (Butterworth & Co. Ltd., England, 1976) p. 236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haining Yang
    • 1
  • Mingyuan Gu
    • 1
  • Weiji Jiang
    • 1
  • Guoding Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of MMCsShanghai Jiao-Tong UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations