Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 29, Issue 6, pp 1692–1699 | Cite as

Microstructure and wear of some high-tensile brasses

  • A. Waheed
  • N. Ridley
Papers

Abstract

The relationship between microstructure, coefficient of friction and wear behaviour against mild steel has been examined for three commercially extruded high-tensile brasses, containing additions of manganese (∼3 wt%) and silicon (∼1 wt%). The alloys contained an approximately constant volume fraction of Mn5Si3 (6–7%) but the proportions of the α and β phases present were varied widely both by heat treatment and by changing the composition, particularly the aluminium content which lay in the range 0–3 wt%. A conventional pin-on-rotating-disc configuration with different loads and sliding speeds was used to determine the wear and the coefficient of friction. The effect of heat treatment on the wear behaviour of given alloys was complex, and depended on the volume fraction of the α and β phases, on their distribution in the microstructure, and on the ease with which the hard Mn5Si3 particles became detached from the phases in which they were located. The average coefficient of friction for the materials examined was 0.36±0.02 and showed little variation with composition and microstructure, but it was clear that the experimental data was being influenced by detachment of Mn5Si3 particles. Results for the three alloys examined are presented and discussed.

Keywords

Polymer Aluminium Silicon Microstructure Experimental Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anon, “Source Book on Copper and Copper Alloys” (ASM, Metals Park, Ohio, 1979) p. 29.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anon, “High Tensile Brasses” CDA Publication No. 42 (Copper Development Association, Potters Bar, UK, 1986) p. 35.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. A. Varli, N. V. Edneral, A. I. Leikin, Y. A. Skakov and B. V. Tyurin, Metalloved. Term. Obrab. Met. 6 (1978) 34.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. S. Sun, G. W. Lorimer and N. Ridley, Met. Trans. 20A (1989) 1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y. A. Chang, J. P. Newman, A. Mikula and D. Goldberg, “Phase Diagrams and Thermodynamic Properties of Ternary Copper Metal Systems”, (International Copper Research Association, NSRDS, USA, 1979) p. 543.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Watanabe, N. Kono and M. Gonda, J. Jpn Inst. Metals 36 (1972) 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Pops, Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME 230 (1964) 813.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. E. Rollason, “Metallurgy for Engineers” (Edward Arnold, 1980) p. 310.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Holm, “Mechanical Wear” (American Society for Metals, Ohio, 1950).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. T. Burwell and C. D. Strang, J. Appl. Phys. 23 (1952) 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. F. Archard, ibid—. 24 (1953) 981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. F. Archard and E. Hurst, Proc. Roy. Soc. 236A (1956) 397.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Y. Taga and K. Nakagima, Wear 37 (1976) 356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Waheed
    • 1
  • N. Ridley
    • 2
  1. 1.Pakistan Institute of Nuclear Science and TechnologyIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.Manchester Materials Science CentreManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations