Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 29, Issue 6, pp 1462–1470 | Cite as

Wear performance and mechanisms of EN coating under reciprocating sliding conditions

  • C. M. Li
  • K. N. Tandon


Electroless nickel (EN) coatings are commonly used as an engineering coating for protecting components from corrosion and wear. In the present work, EN was applied to a mild steel substrate and its wear performance under dry as well as lubricated conditions was evaluated for reciprocating sliding wear. A sliding pin made from nodular cast iron was used as the mating surface. In order to assess the wear mechanisms involved in the process, both optical and scanning electron microscopy were utilized to study the wear surface and the debris. The results indicate that the EN coating performed very well under lubricated conditions. In dry tests, extensive adhesion and material transfer was observed. Scanning electron micrographs have been interpreted to analyse various wear mechanisms operating under different loading conditions.


Scanning Electron Microscopy Loading Condition Mild Steel Electron Micrographs Cast Iron 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    K. Parker, “Recent Advances in Electroless Nickel Deposits”, 8th Interfinish Conference, Basel (1972).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. N. Duncan, Met. Prog. 127 (1983) 31.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Parker, Plating 61 (1974) 834.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. P. Radin and H. E. Hintermann, ibid.54 (1967) 523.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    U. Ma and D. T. Gawne, Trans IMF 64 (1986) 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Lu, G. Li and F. Yu, Wear Mater. (1985) 382.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. T. Gawne and U. Ma, Wear 120 (1987) 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. J. Tomlinson and S. N. Foulkes, Tribol. Int. 21 (1988) 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. D. R. Jarret, Ind. Finish. (Lond.) 18 (1966) 41.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. N. Duncan, Mater. Perform. 22 (1983) 28.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. J. Tomlinson and M. W. Carroll, J. Mater. Sci. 25 (1990) 4972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. H. Park and D. H. Lee, ibid.23 (1988) 1643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. J. Keyse and C. Hammond, Mat. Sci Technol. 3 (1987) 963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. C. Agareval and S. Ray, Z. Metallkde 79 (1988) 472.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. H. Graham, R. W. Lindsay and H. J. Read, J. Electrochem. Soc. 112 (1965) 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. L. Ko, Trib. Int. 20 (1987) 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Tabor, Inst. Mech. Eng. C245 (1987) 157.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Usmani and K. N. Tandon, J. Thermal Spray Tech. 1 (1992) 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. M. Li
    • 1
  • K. N. Tandon
    • 1
  1. 1.Metallurgical Sciences Lab/EITC-AIM Initiative, Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations