Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 819–827 | Cite as

Improved mechanical properties in dissimilar Ti-AISI 304L joints

  • A. Fuji
  • K. Ameyama
  • T. H. North
Papers

Abstract

The effect of low temperature post weld heat treatment on the tensile strength and bend test properties of dissimilar friction welds between titanium and AISI 304L stainless steel joints is investigated. Post weld heat treatment at temperatures less than 873 K has no effect on joint tensile strength properties, but markedly improves bend test properties. The highest bend angle is produced using a post-weld heat treatment at 773 K for 1 h (the Larson-Miller parameter corresponding to this treatment is 15.5×103 K h−1). Low temperature heat treatment improves bend ductility, because stress relaxation occurs with minimal increase in the transition region width at the bondline region. Dissimilar joint bend testing properties decrease markedly when the width of the transition region exceeds 1–2 μm. An explanation for the detrimental effect of thick transition regions at the joint interface region on the mechanical properties of dissimilar joints is proposed. It is suggested that the development of significant triaxial stress due to the constraint imposed by large, needle-shaped intermetallic particles promotes premature joint failure in joints containing thick transition regions.

Keywords

Post Weld Heat Treatment Bend Angle Dissimilar Joint Friction Weld Dissimilar Friction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. FUTAMATA and A. FUJI, Trans. Jpn Welding Soc. 1 (1990) 58.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. FUJI, T. H. NORTH, K. AMEYAMA and M. FUTAMATA, Mater. Sci. Technol. 8 (1992) 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. C. KIM, A. FUJI and T. H. NORTH, J. Jpn Welding Soc. 2 (1994) 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. J. JESSOP, E. D. NICHOLAS and W. O. DINSDALE, in “TWI conference, Advances in Welding Processes” (Harrogate, 1978) Paper 49.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. K. KHARCHENKO, Automatic Welding 4 (1969) 29 (Translated from Russian).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. CHRISTMAN, A. NEEDLEMAN and S. SURESH, Acta Metall. 37 (1989) 3029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Z. WANG, T. K. CHEN and D. J. LLOYD, Metall. Trans. A 24 (1993) 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. K. KHARCHENKO, Automatic Welding 7 (1974) 17, (Translated from Russian).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. ELLIOTT and E. R. WALLACH, Metal Construction 4 (1981) 221.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. FUJI and K. AMEYAMA, Seminar on Joining of Advanced Materials (Kobe, Japan, July 1993) pp. 235–244.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    I. A. CHERNENKO, Welding Int. 7 (1989) 586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. ARITOSHI, K. OKITA, K. IKEUCH and F. MATSUDA, J. Jpn Weld. Soc. 4 (1991) 474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Fuji
    • 1
  • K. Ameyama
    • 2
  • T. H. North
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringKitami Institute of TechnologyHokkaidoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringRitsumeikan UniversityKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Metallurgy and Materials ScienceUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations