Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 633–641 | Cite as

Microstructural characterization of SiC/Al and FP/Al metal matrix composites subjected to dynamic loadings

  • M. Nanduri
  • A. Shukla
Papers
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

The Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar technique was used to study the dynamic response of silicon carbide particle- and whisker-reinforced aluminium (SiC/Al-P and SiC/Al-W) and continuous Fibre FP-reinforced aluminium (FP/Al), metal matrix composites, subjected to high strain rates in the range of 300–3200 s−1. The response of these composites was characterized by macroscopic and microscopic observations. Experiments on SiC/Al-W and FP/Al were conducted with the whiskers/fibres oriented in the axial, as well as, in the transverse direction with respect to the loading direction. It was observed that for the silicon carbide-reinforced metal matrix composites, the dynamic flow stress values were consistently higher than the static/quasi-static values. Experiments conducted on FP/Al with the fibres oriented transversely to the loading direction, revealed failure stress values considerably lower than the static/quasi-static values. This anomalous behaviour was attributed to the predominantly shear mode failure of the material. Microscopic observations using optical and scanning electron microscopy corroborate the macroscopically observed behaviour.

Keywords

Carbide Mode Failure Flow Stress Silicon Carbide Microscopic Observation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. HOPKINSON, “tOriginal papers by J. Hopkinson”, Vol. 11, (Cambridge University Press, 1901) pp. 316–24.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. HOPKINSON, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 74 (1905) 498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Idem, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 213 (1914) 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. KOLSKY, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Land. B 62 (1949) 676.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. HARDING, E. O. WOOD and J. D. CAMPBELL, J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2 (1960) 88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    U. S. LINDHOLM and L. M. YEAKLEY, Exp. Mech. 8 (1968) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. E. HAUSER, J. A. SIMMONS and J. E. DORN, in“Response of Metals to High Velocity Deformation, Metallurgical Society Conference”, Vol. 9, edited by P. G. SHEWMON and V. F. ZACKAY (Interscience, New York, 1961) p. 63.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. E. BAKER and C. H. YEW, J. Appl. Mech. 33 (1966) 917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. L. CHIDDISTER and L. E. MALVERN, Exp. Mech. 3 (1963) 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    U. S. LINDHOLM, Mech. Phys. Solids 12 (1964) 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. D. H. DAVIES and S. C. HUNTER, ibid. 11 (1963) 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. S. FOLLANSBEE,“Mechanical Testing, Metals Handbook”, 9th Edn, Vol. 8 (ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1985) pp. 198–203.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. NEMAT-NASSER, J. B. ISAACS and J. E. STARRETT, Proc. R. Soc. Land. A 435 (1991) 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. RAVICHANDRAN and W. CHEN, in “Experiments in Micromechanics of Failure Resistant Materials”, AMD Vol. 130, edited by K. S. Kim (ASME, 1991) pp. 85–90Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. DA SILVA, and K. T. RAMESH, ibid., pp. 105–18.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. I. HONG, G. T. GRAY III and J. J. LEWANDOWSKI, Acta Metall. Mater. 41 (1993) 2337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Nanduri
    • 1
  • A. Shukla
    • 1
  1. 1.Dynamic Photomechanics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied MechanicsUniversity of Rhode IslandKingstonUSA

Personalised recommendations