Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 29, Issue 9, pp 2500–2506 | Cite as

Structural studies of polypyrroles with fibrillar morphology

  • J. Mansouri
  • R. P. Burford
Papers

Abstract

Fibrillar polypyrroles have been prepared by electrodeposition through honeycomb γ-alumina membranes. The morphology has been extensively studied using field-emission scanning electron microscopy. The rate of fibre growth in several solvents has been measured by direct length measurement. The occupation of the host membrane pores by polypyrrole has been examined by ultramicrotome techniques. In extended polymerizations, both solid rods and tubes are found.

Keywords

Polymer Microscopy Electron Microscopy Scanning Electron Microscopy Material Processing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. 1.
    A. F. Diaz and J. A. Hogan, J. Electroanal. Chem. 111 (1980) 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    “Lutamer” (B.A.S.F., Ludwigshafen).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. N. Atchison, R. P. Burford, T. A. Darragh and T. Tongtam, Polym. Int. 26 (1991) 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. R. Anderson and B. R. Mattes, Synthetic Metals 41–43 (1991) 1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. P. Armes, M. Aldissi, M. Hawley, J. G. Beery and S. Gottesfeld, Langmuir 7 (1991) 1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. H. Kaufman, A. L. Nazzal, O. R. Melory and A. Kapitulnik, Phys. Rev. 35 (1987) 1881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. R. Martin, L. S. Van Dyke, Z. Cai and W. Liang, J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 112 (1990) 8976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. R. Martin and R. M. Penner, J. Electrochem. Soc. 133 (1986) 2206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. P. Burford and T. Tongtam, J. Mater. Sci. 26 (1991) 3264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Bloor, R. D. Hercliffe, G. C. Galiotis and R. J. Young in “Electronic Properties of Polymers and Related Compounds” edited by H. Kuzmany, M. Mehring and S. Roth, Springer series of Solid State Sciences no. 63 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985) p. 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. J. Hahn, W. E. Stanchina, W. J. Gadja and P. Vogelhut, J. Electron. Mater. 15 (1986) 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. S. Maddison and J. Unworth, Synthetic Metals 30 (1989) 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Wernet and G. Wegner, Macromol. Chem. 188 (1987) 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. J. Mcgarry and J. E. Moalli, Polymer 32 (1991) 1816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. V. Gregory, W. C. Kimbrell and H. H. Kuhn, Synthetic Metals 28 (1989) 823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Z. Cai and C. R. Martin, J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 111 (1989) 4138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. R. Martin, Adv. Mater. 31 (1991) 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    C. J. Brumlik and C. R. Martin, J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 113 (1991) 3174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Mansouri
    • 1
  • R. P. Burford
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Polymer Science, School of Chemical Engineering and Industrial ChemistryUniversity of New South WalesKensingtonAustralia

Personalised recommendations