Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 29, Issue 9, pp 2359–2366 | Cite as

Mechanics and form of the maize leaf: in vivo qualification of flexural behaviour

  • B. Moulia
  • M. Fournier
  • D. Guitard
Papers

Abstract

An in vivo flexural test is designed and conducted on maize leaves. Data processing is based on a local structural definition of longitudinal leaf suppleness, which originates in the theory of pure plane bending of initially curved beams, in large displacements. A specific procedure for curvature and suppleness computation is methodologically discussed. The results presented concern only the elastic flexural behaviour of the leaf (which could be characterized in 59% of the tested leaves). A quasi-exponential increase in suppleness, from the base to the tip of the leaf, was always experienced. It is demonstrated that the midrib plays a major part in bending stiffness. Going up the longitudinal leaf form, it is shown that self weight related elastic bending strains only account for one-third of the actual curvature.

Keywords

Polymer Maize Data Processing Major Part Material Processing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L. J. Gibson, M. F. Ashby and K. E. Easterling, J. Mater. Sci. 23 (1988) 3041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Niklas, Am. J. Bot. 78 (4) (1991) 561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. N. Moshenin, in “Physical properties of plant and animal materials”, 2nd Edn, (Gordon & Breach, New York, 1986) p. 882.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Fournier, R. Moulia, B. Chanson and B. Thibaut, in Proceedings of the first international seminar on structural morphology, Montpellier (France), September 1992, edited by R. Motro and T. Webster (LMGC, EAL Montpellier, 1992).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Vogel, J. Exp. Bot. 43 (1992) 1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Moulia, in Actes du deuxième séminaire sur “Architecture, Structure et Mécanique de l'Arbre”, Montpellier (France), February 1991, edited by B. Thibaut (LMGC, Montpellier, 1991).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. F. Ledent, Phytomorphology 17 (1976) 309.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. L. Satter, in “Encyclopedia of plant physiology”, New Series, Vol. 7, edited by Haupt and Feinleib (Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, 1980) p. 443.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. J. Greenberg, A. Mehling, M. Lee and J. H. Bock, J. Mater. Sci. 24 (1989) 2549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. F. V. Vincent, ibid. 17 (1982) 856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Idem. ibid. 26 (1991) 1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Sinoquet, B. Moulia and R. Bonhomme, Agric. For. Meteor. 55 (1991) 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Moulia and H. Sinoquet, in Proceedings of the conference on crop structure and microclimate, Saumane (France), September 1991, edited by C. Varlet-Grancher, R. Bonhomme and H. Sinoquet (INRA, Paris, 1993) p. 530.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Groupe Francais De Rheologie, in “Dictionnaire de rhéologie” (Groupe Français de Rhéologie, IMF, Toulouse, 1988) p. 21.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. C. Sharman, Ann. Bot. 6 (1942) 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. Prevot, F. Aries and P. Monestiez, Agronomie 11 (1991) 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. A. Lockhart, Am. J. Bot. 46 (1956) 705.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    W. K. Silk, L. L. Wang and R. E. Cleland, Plant Physiol. 70 (1982) 460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. Timoshenko, in “Résistance des matériaux, tome 1: Théorie élémentaire et problèmes” (translated to French from the 3rd US edition by R. Pinto, DUNOD, Paris, 1968) p. 420.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    B. Moulia and M. Fournier, in Proceedings of the first international seminar on structural morphology, La Grande Motte (France), September 1992, edited by R. Motro and T. Webster (LMGC, Ecole d'Architecture, Montpellier, 1992).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Y. Gradan, “Mathématiques et C.A.O: 1-méthodes de base” (Hermes, Paris, 1986) p. 164.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    W. K. Silk, Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35 (1984) 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Tomassone, E. Lesquoy and C. Millier “La régression: nouveaux regards sur une ancienne méthode statistique” (Masson-Inra, Paris, 1983).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sas Institute Inc., in “SAS/STATTM Guide for personnal computer, Version 6 edition” (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1987) p. 1028.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Moulia
    • 2
    • 1
  • M. Fournier
    • 1
  • D. Guitard
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Rhéologie du Bois de BordeauxUMR 123 CNRS, INRA, Université de Bordeaux ICestas-GazinetFrance
  2. 2.Plant Biomechanics GroupV. R. de Bioclimatologie, INRAThiverval-GrignonFrance

Personalised recommendations