Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 29, Issue 12, pp 3128–3150 | Cite as

Fabrication of particulate aluminium-matrix composites by liquid metal infiltration

  • Shy Wen Lai
  • D. D. L. Chung
Article

Abstract

Aluminium-matrix composites were fabricated by liquid metal infiltration of porous particulate reinforcement preforms, using AlN, SiC and Al2O3 as the particles. The quality of the composites depended on the preform fabrication technology. In this work, this technology was developed for high-volume fraction (up to 75%) particulate preforms, which are more sensitive to the preform fabrication process than lower volume fraction whisker/fibre preforms as their porosity and pore size are much lower. The technology developed used an acid phosphate binder (with P/Al molar ratio=23) in the amount of 0.1 wt% of the preform, in contrast to the much larger binder amount used for whisker preforms. The preforms were made by filtration of a slurry consisting of the reinforcement particles, the binder and carrier (preferably acetone), and subsequent baking (preferably at 200 °C) for the purpose of drying. Baking in air at 500 °C instead of 200 °C caused the AlN preforms to oxidize, thereby decreasing the thermal conductivity of the resulting Al/AlN composites. The reinforcement-binder reactivity was larger for AlN than SiC, but this reactivity did not affect the composite properties due to the small binder amount used. The Al/AlN composites were superior to the Al/SiC composites in the thermal conductivity and tensile ductility. The Al/Al2O3 composites were the poorest due to Al2O3 particle clustering.

Keywords

Thermal Conductivity Al2O3 Ductility Phosphate Binder Particulate Reinforcement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jeng-Maw Chiou, Ph.D. thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1991.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. M. Chiou and D. D. L. Chung, J. Mater. Sci. 28 (1993) 1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Idem, ibid. 28 (1993) 1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Idem, ibid. 28 (1993) 1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. C. Progelhof, J. L. Throne and R. R. Ruetsch, Polym. Engng Sci. 16 (1976) 615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. K. Aghajanian, J. T. Burke, D. R. White and A. S. Nagelberg, SAMPE Q. 20 (1989) 43.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.-Y. Oh, J. A. Cornie and K. C. Russell, Met. Trans. A 20A (1989) 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. C. Viala, P. Fortier and J. Bouix, J. Mater. Sci. 25 (1990) 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Z. Hashin and S. Shtrikman, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 11 (1963) 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. D. Katnani and K. I. Papathomas, J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 5 (1987) 1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shy-Wen Lai and D. D. L. Chung, J. Mater. Sci., in press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shy Wen Lai
    • 1
  • D. D. L. Chung
    • 1
  1. 1.Composite Materials Research LaboratoryState University of New York at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations