Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 29, Issue 18, pp 4918–4926 | Cite as

Effective and recovery stresses in deformation studies of polyvinyl chloride and polypropylene using the modified strain transient dip test

  • S. H. Teoh
  • A. N. Poo
  • G. B. Ong


Partitioning the applied stress into internal stress components (effective and recovery) using the modified strain transient dip test is a useful approach towards a better understanding of the viscoelastic nature of polymers. The internal stresses of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polypropylene (PP) were measured successfully using this test on a computer-controlled electro-servo hydraulic tensile testing machine which was designed for rapid step unloading in less than 1 s to avoid memory effects of the polymers. A power-law relationship can be used to describe the variation of the internal stress components with strain. Actual yield strains occurred at smaller values (less than 2%) than those obtained from a conventional stressstrain diagram (which for PVC and PP exceed 3.5% and 7%, respectively). This observation indicated that plastic yielding occurred much earlier and yield strains from conventional stress-strain diagrams may be overestimates. For very ductile material (PP) the activation volumes were comparable in magnitude to that obtained conventionally; whilst for less ductile material (PVC), the activation volume was four times higher. One of the main advantages of stress partitioning is for the detailed definition of the extrapolated yield point which otherwise will be missed out in a conventional plot of applied stress and strain.


Yield Point Polypropylene Applied Stress Memory Effect Activation Volume 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S. H. Teoh, B. W. Cherry and H. H. Kausch Int. J. Damage Mech. 1 (1992) 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. H. Teoh, PhD thesis, Materials Engineering Department, Monash University, Australia (1992).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. H. Teoh, C. L. Chuah and A. N. Poo, J. Mater, Sci. 22 (1987) 1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. G. Fotheringham and B. W. Cherry, ibid. 13 (1978) 951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. M. Shinozaki and C. M. Sargent, Mater. Sci. Eng. 35 (1978) 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. S. Krausz and H. Eyring, “Deformation Kinetics” (Wiley, New York, 1975) p. 260.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. N. Ahlquist and W. D. Nix, Scripta Metall. 3 (1969) 679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. Bergman, Scand. J. Metall 4 (1975) 109.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. H. Teoh, A. N. Poo, A. O. Tay and G. B. Ong, in “Proceedings of the International Conference on Plastics and Rubber Processing 1989-Automation and Computer”, Singapore, edited by S. H. Teoh (Plastics and Rubber Institute, Singapore Section, 1989) p. 110.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. O. Tay and S. H. Teoh, Polym. Test. 8 (1989) 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. H. Teoh and B. W. Cherry, Polymer 25 (1983) 727.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. H. Kausch, “Polymer Fracture”, 2nd Edn (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987) p. 248.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. H. Teoh
    • 1
  • A. N. Poo
    • 1
  • G. B. Ong
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Production EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations