Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 30, Issue 5, pp 1233–1239 | Cite as

Interfacial reaction of alumina with Ag-Cu-Ti alloy

  • Hao Hongqi
  • Wang Yonglan
  • Jin Zhihao
  • Wang Xiaotian
Papers

Abstract

The interfacial reaction of Al2O3 and Ag-Cu-Ti alloy was investigated by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD), respectively. It was shown that Al2O3 ceramic reacted strongly with Ag-Cu-Ti alloy. With the increasing heating temperature and holding time, the reaction layer thickness increased and its growth was mainly controlled by the diffusion of titanium through the reaction layer. The reaction products were Cu2Ti4O and AlTi at or below 1123 K. However, there were two distinct layers at the interface at or above 1173 K, one layer in the vicinity of ceramic consisting mainly of Ti2O and TiO and the other layer near the alloy was CuTi2, a layer transition structures with a Al2O3/Ti2O+TiO/Ti2O +TiO+CuTi2/CuTi2/Ag-Cu formed at the interface according to the SEM and XRD analyses results. A lower or a higher joining temperature and a shorter or a longer holding time were disadvantageous for a stable and high reliable joined interface from the point of view of interfacial microstructures and morphologies.

Keywords

Scanning Electron Microscope Titanium Al2O3 Layer Thickness Transition Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. H. Kim, S. H. Hwang and S. S. Chun, J. Mater. Sci. 26 (1991) 3223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. E. Loehman, A. P. Tomsia, J. A. Pask and S. M. Johnson, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73(3) (1990) 552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. Kakao, K. Nishimoto and K. Saida, Trans. JWS 21 (2) (1990) 63.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. E. Morgan, E. K. Broadhent and D. K. Sadana, Appl. Phys. Lett. 49 (19) (1986) 1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. E. Loehman, Ceram. Bull. 68 (4) (1989) 891.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Econonos and W. D. Kingery, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 36 (12) (1953) 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. P. Hammond, S. A. David and H. L. Santella, Weld. J. 67 (10) (1988) 227.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. J. Moorhead and H. Keating, Weld. J. 65 (10) (1986) 17.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hao Hongqi, Jin Zhihao and Wang Xiaotian, J. Mater. Sci. 29 (1994) 5041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Kritsalis, L. Coudrier and N. Eustanopoulos, J. Mater. Sci. 26 (1991) 3400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yu. V. Naidich, V. S. Zhuravlev, V. G. Chuprina and L. V. Strashinskaya, Poroshkovaya Metallurgiya, 31 (11) (1973) 40.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. C. Cho and Jin Yu, Scripta Metall, 26 (1992) 797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. L. Santella, J. A. Horton and J. J. Pak, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 (1990) 1785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Naka, K. Sampath, I. Okamoto and Y. Arata, Trans. JWRI, 12 (2) (1983) 181.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    JANAF Thermochemical Tables, 3rd Edition, Vol. 14 (1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hao Hongqi
    • 1
  • Wang Yonglan
    • 1
  • Jin Zhihao
    • 1
  • Wang Xiaotian
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringXi'an Jiaotong UniversityXi'anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations