Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 29, Issue 13, pp 3505–3509 | Cite as

Fatigue crack growth of Fe81B13.5Si3.5C2 amorphous metal using magnetostrictive behaviour to generate ΔK

  • A. E. Willard
  • G. C. Salivar


The fatigue crack growth behaviour of Fe81B13.5Si3.5C2 amorphous metal (Metglas 2605SC) was examined. An experimental apparatus was developed to generate the applied stress intensity range, ΔK using the magnetostrictive behaviour of the material. Cycles of elastic strain were accumulated at the natural frequency of the specimens (44 or 56 kHz) with the crack length being monitored optically at certain cycle increments. Through-the-thickness, centre-cracked panel specimens were tested in the as-cast and annealed conditions. Annealing temperatures were 250 and 450 °C. Several specimens annealed at 300 °C, while being subjected to a transverse magnetic field, were also tested. Examination of the fatigue crack growth rate data indicated no differences between the as-cast and the annealed only specimens. The specimens that were annealed while being subjected to the transverse magnetic field, however, exhibited much greater resistance to fatigue crack growth. Microscopy using a Kerr-effect magneto-optical microscope revealed that the magnetic domain boundaries within the material exerted a significant influence on the direction of the fatigue crack propagation and the overall crack growth rate behaviour.


Crack Growth Rate Fatigue Crack Growth Fatigue Crack Propagation Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Transverse Magnetic Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    H. Kimura and T. Masumoto, Scripta Metall. 9 (1975) 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Ogura, K. Fukushima and T. Masumoto, in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Rapidly Quenched Metals, Sec. II. Mater. Sci. Engng. 23 (1976) 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. A. Davis, J. Mater. Sci. 11 (1976) 711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Ogura, T. Masumoto and H. Fukushima, Scripta Metall. 9 (1975) 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. T. Alpas, L. Edwards and C. N. Reid, Mater. Sci. Engng. 98 (1988) 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Masumoto and R. Maddin, Mater. Sci. Engng. 19 (1975) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. A. Davis, J. Mater. Sci. 10 (1975) 1557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. E. CallisterMaterials science and engineering” (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1985) p. 517.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. ChikazumiPhysics of magnetism” (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1964) p. 161 and 213.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Allied Corporation, Metglas Products, 6 Eastmans Road, Parsippany, NJ 07054, USA.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Standard test method for measurement of fatigue crack growth rates, ASTM E647-91. American Society for Testing and Materials, “Annual book of ASTM standards”, Vol. 03.01, 1991, p. 654.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. E. Willard
    • 1
  • G. C. Salivar
    • 2
  1. 1.Engineering DepartmentSensormatic Electronics CorporationDeerfield BeachUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA

Personalised recommendations