Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 30, Issue 7, pp 1728–1732 | Cite as

Examination of reported size effects in ultra-micro-indentation testing

  • M. Atkinson
Papers

Abstract

The “indentation size effect” described in some reports of ultra-micro-indentation hardness tests has been examined to elucidate its cause. The magnitude of the effect was found to be associated with the strain-hardening propensity of the material tested, and thus similar to that observed in conventional tests with greater force, but the ranges of hardness variation were discontinuous. The relatively small size effect in ultra-micro-indentation testing seems to imply very low effective friction between indenter and specimen: a condition which could be due to ‘dither’ in the closed-loop servo control of ultra-micro-indentation.

Keywords

Polymer Material Processing Hardness Test Small Size Effect Indentation Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K. N. Frischat, in “Strength of Inorganic Glasses” (Plenum Press, New York, 1986) pp. 135–44.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. Mason, P. F. Johnson and J. R. Varner, J. Mater. Sci. 26 (1991) 6576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Atkinson, J. Test. Eval. 19 (1991) 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. E. Samuels, in “Microindentation Techniques in Materials Science and Engineering”, ASTM STP 889, edited by P. J. Blau and B. R. Lawn, (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1986) pp. 5–25.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Atkinson and H. Shi, Mater. Sci. Technol. 5 (1989) 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Shi and M. Atkinson, J. Mater. Sci. 25 (1990) 2111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Atkinson, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 33 (1991) 843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Li, A. Ghosh, Y. H. Han and R. C. Bradt, private communication. (submitted for publication)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. C. Oliver and G. M. Pharr, J. Mater. Res. 7 (1992) 1564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. J. Bell, J. S. Field and M. V. Swain, Mater. Forum 17 (1993) 127.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Tate, Trans. Amer. Soc. Metall. 35 (1945) 374.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Froelich, P. Grau and W. Grellmann, Phys. Status Solidi 42 (1977) 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Yoshino, Bull. JSME 8 (1965) 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    N. Gane and J. M. Cox, Philos. Mag. 19 (1970) 881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Atkinson
    • 1
  1. 1.JamberooAustralia

Personalised recommendations