Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 1067–1074 | Cite as

Effect of extrusion parameters on the microstructure and properties of an Al-Li-Mg-Zr alloy

  • S. Kumar
  • H. B. McShane
  • T. Sheppard


The effect of the extrusion temperature and the extrusion ratio on the microstructure and mechanical properties of an Al-Li-Mg-Zr alloy in the as-extruded, solution-treated and aged conditions were investigated. It was found that an increase in the extrusion temperature and ratio increased the degree of recrystallization in the extrudate. An increase in the extrusion temperature also increased the sub-grain size, whereas the extrusion ratio did not affect the sub-grain size. The strength of the extrudates decreased and the ductility increased in the asextruded condition with increases in the extrusion temperature and the extrusion ratio.

However, in the solution-treated condition, although the effect of the extrusion ratio on the mechanical properties was found to be the same as in the as-extruded condition, the trend with the extrusion temperature changes and the extrusion temperature was not simple in its influence on the mechanical properties. The fracture toughness remained almost unaffected by variation either in the extrusion temperature or the extrusion ratio.


Polymer Microstructure Mechanical Property Recrystallization Ductility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    K.K. Sankaran and N. J. Grant Mater. Sci. Engng. 44, (1980) 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. E. Quist, G. H. Narayanan and A. L. Wingert: in “Aluminum lithium alloys II”, edited by T. H. Sanders jr and E. A. Starke jr, (The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, PA 1984) p. 89.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. C. Parson and T. Sheppard: in “Aluminium Lithium Alloys III” edited by C. Baker, P. J. Gregson, S. J. Harris and C. J. Peel (The Institute of Metals, London, (1986) p. 222.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. H. Skillinberg and R. F. Ashton, in the Fourth International Conference on Aluminium Lithium Alloys, edited by G. Champier, B. Dubost, D. Mainnay and L. Sabety, J. de Phys., Coll. C3, (1987) p. 187.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. A. Reynolds and E. Creed, ibid. p. 195.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. K. Mukhopadhyay, H. M. Flower and T. Sheppard, ibid. p. 219.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Tempus, G. Scharf and W. Calles, ibid. p. 187.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Sheppard and M. J. Tan, in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Aluminum Lithium Alloys, Williamsburg, Virginia, March 27–31 1989, edited by E. A. Starke and T. H. Sanders, (Materials and Component Engineering Publications Ltd, Birmingham, UK, 1989) Vol. II, 233.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. E. Pegram, T. H. Sanders jr, C. J. Hartshorn, P. C. McKeighan, M. G. Valentine and B. M. Hillberry, p. 261.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Kumar, H. B., McShane and T. Sheppard, Mater. Sci Technol. to be published.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. J. Cieslak AlCOA Short Rod Fracture Toughness Indicator Test, Report No. GA-176841, ALCOA Application Engineering Division 26th May (1985).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. L. Makin and W. M. Stobbs in “Aluminium Lithium Alloys II”, edited by T. H. Sanders jr. and F. A. Starke jr. (The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1984) p. 392.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Kumar
    • 1
  • H. B. McShane
    • 1
  • T. Sheppard
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MaterialsImperial College Of Science, Technology and MedicineLondonUK

Personalised recommendations