Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 30, Issue 13, pp 3407–3414 | Cite as

Influence of temperature and interelectrode distance on the negative differential resistance in metal-chalcogenide glassy semiconductors

  • M. Domínguez
  • E. Márquez
  • P. Villares
  • R. Jiménez-Garay
Article

Abstract

An investigation has been carried out, to elucidate some aspects of the current-controlled negative differential resistance (CCNDR) effect in bulk metal-chalcogenide glassy semiconductors. Because this phenomenon has been shown to be mainly of a thermal nature, a model, from the thermodynamic point of view, was developed, including some aspects related to the thermistors theory. The main conclusion from this model is the appearance of a current filament, which showed up when the material switched from the high electrical resistance to the low electrical resistance state, forming a crystalline filament between both electrodes. The variation of the CCNDR parameters with temperature and interelectrodic distance was studied, using both coplanar point electrodes and coplanar disc electrodes. The experimental results show a good agreement with the expected behaviour from the proposed thermal model (especially when natural convection was considered as the heat-exchanging process between the material and the ambient surrounding). In addition an algorithm was found to simulate the phenomenon computationally, using the experimentally determined physical parameters for the samples under study.

Keywords

Natural Convection High Electrical Resistance Thermal Model Resistance State Disc Electrode 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. R. OVSHINSKY, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21 (1968) 1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. MÁRQUEZ, R. JIMÉNEZ-GARAY, A. ZAKERY, P. J. S. EWEN and A. E. OWEN, Philos. Mag. B 63 (1991) 1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. MÁRQUEZ, J. B. RAMÍREZ-MALO, J. FERNÁNDEZ-PEÑA, R. JIMÉNEZ-GARAY, P. J. S. EWEN and A. E. OWEN, Opt. Mater. 2 (1993) 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. I. FRAZER, PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh (1982).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. R. OVSHINSKY and H. FRITZSCHE, IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. ED-20 (1973) 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. L. VANINOV and S. K. NOVOSELOV, Inorg. Mater. 13 (1977) 1573.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. V. DANILOV and R. L. MYULLER, Zh. Prikl. Khim. 35 (1962) 2012.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. ADLER, CRC Crit. Rev. Solid State Sci. 2 (1971) 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. K. RIDLEY, Proc. Phys. Soc. 82 (1963) 954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. M. HAYES and D. D. THORNBURG, in “Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Amorphous and Liquid Semiconductors” (Taylor and Francis, London, 1974) p. 889.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. DOMÍNGUEZ, E. MÁRQUEZ, P. VILLARES and R. JIMÉNEZ-GARAY, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 3 (1988) 1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Idem, in “Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Non-Crystalline Solids (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991) p. 437.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. MÁRQUEZ, J. VÁZQUEZ, N. De La ROSA-FOX, P. VILLARES and R. JIMÉNEZ-GARAY, J. Mater. Sci. 23 (1988) 1399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. MÁRQUEZ, L. ESQUIVIAS, P. VILLARES and R. JIMÉNEZ-GARAY, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 56 (1985) 1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. MÁRQUEZ, P. VILLARES and R. JIMÉNEZ-GARAY, Phys. Status. Solidi (a) 102 (1987) 741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Idem, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 105 (1988) 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. R. De GROOT, “Termodinámica de los procesos irreversibles” (Alhambra, Madrid, 1968).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    H. K. ROCKSTAD and M. P. SHAW, IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. ED-20 (1973) 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. FRITZSCHE, IBM J. Res. Dev. 13 (1969) 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. MÁRQUEZ, M. DOMÍNGUEZ, J. MARTÍNEZ, P. VILLARES and R. JIMÉNEZ-GARAY, Anal. Fis. B 86 (1990) 134.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. W. SCARR and R. A. SETTERINGTON, in “Proceedings of IEE”, Paper 3176M (1960) p. 395.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    O. J. M. SMITH, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 21 (1950) 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    H. S. CARSLAW and J. C. JAEGER, “Conduction of heat in solids” (Oxford University Press, London, 1959).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. C. JAEGER, Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 46 (1950) 634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Domínguez
    • 1
  • E. Márquez
    • 1
  • P. Villares
    • 1
  • R. Jiménez-Garay
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Estructura y Propiedades de los Materiales, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de CádizPuerto RealSpain

Personalised recommendations