Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Gender interactions between interviewer and survey respondents: Issues of pornography and community standards


Several sociological perspectives, including social distance and social acquiescence theories, suggest that survey responses to threatening or sensitive questions may be influenced by interviewer gender. Most of the empirical work bearing on this issue has been conducted using face-to-face interviews. Research presented here examines interviewer gender effects in a telephone survey concerned with a sexually sensitive topic — the sale and consumption of pornographic materials. Subjects were mostly white middle-class adults living in a medium-sized metropolitan community. Approximately equal numbers of males (n=230) and females (n=219) were interviewed. Findings suggest that, although a weak trend indicative of an acquiescence effect was observed, interviewer gender effects may not in general be a serious source of nonsampling errors in telephone surveys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Axinn, W. G. (1991). The influence of interviewer sex on responses to sensitive questions in Nepal. Social Science Research, 20, 303–318.

  2. Benny, M., Riesman D., & Star, S. A. (1956). Age and sex in the interview. American Journal of Sociology, 62, 143–152.

  3. Bradburn, N. M., Sudman, S. & Associates (1979). Improving Interview Method and Questionnaire Design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  4. Brorsson, B. (1984). Effects of interviewer characteristics and interviewer variability on interview responses. In C. F. Cannell & R. M. Groves (Eds.), Health Survey Research Methods: Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Health Survey Research Methods. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 84-3346. Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office.

  5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Edition. New York: Academic Press.

  6. Collins, M. (1980). Interviewer variability: A review of the problem. Journal of the Market Research Society, 22, 77–95.

  7. Colombotos, J., Elinson, J., & Loewenstein, R. (1968). Effect of interviewers' sex on interviewer responses. Public Health Reports, 83, 685–690.

  8. Couper, M. P. (1991). Modeling survey participation at the interviewer level. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. American Statistical Association. Washington, D.C.

  9. Daniel, W. W. (1978). Applied Nonparametric Statistics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

  10. Delamater, J. D. (1974). Methodological issues in the study of premarital sexuality. Sociological Methods and Research, 3, 30–61.

  11. Finkel, S. E., Guterbock, T. M., & Borg M. J. (1991). Race-of-interviewer effects in a preelection poll: Virginia 1989. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 313–330.

  12. Freeman, J., & Butler, E. W. (1976). Some sources of interviewer variance in surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 79–92.

  13. Glenn, N. D., & Weaver, C. N. (1979). Attitudes toward premarital, extramarital, and homosexual relations in the U.S. in the 1970s. The Journal of Sex Research, 15, 108–118.

  14. Grimes, M. D., & Hansen, G. L. (1984). Response bias in sex-role attitude measurement. Sex Roles, 10, 67–72.

  15. Groves, R. M. (1989). Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  16. Groves, R. M., & Fultz, N. H. (1985). Gender effects among telephone interviews in a survey of economic attitudes. Sociological Methods and Research, 14, 31–52.

  17. Hatchett, S., & Schuman H. (1975–1976). White respondents and race-of-interviewer effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 39, 523–528.

  18. Hyman, H. H. (1954). Interviewing in Social Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  19. Johnson, W. T., & Delamater, J. D. (1976). Response effects in sex surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 165–181.

  20. Landis, J. R., Sullivan, D., & Sheley, J. (1973). Feminist attitudes as related to sex of the interviewer. Pacific Sociological Review, 16, 305–314.

  21. Light, R. J., & Pillemer, D. B. (1984). Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  22. Loewenstein, R., & Varma, A. A. O. (1970). Effect of variation of interviewers and respondents in health surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 472–473.

  23. Nealon, J. (1983). The effects of male vs. female telephone interviewers. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association.

  24. Reiss, I. L. (1967). The Social Context of Premarital Sexual Permissiveness. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

  25. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641.

  26. Schaeffer, N. C. (1980). Evaluating race-of-interviewer effects in a national survey. Sociological Methods and Research, 8, 400–419.

  27. Schofield, M. (1965). The Sexual Behavior of Young People. London: Longmans, Green.

  28. Singh, B. K. (1980). Trends in attitudes toward premarital sexual relations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 387–395.

  29. Smith, T. W. (1990). Report: The Sexual Revolution? Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 415–435.

  30. Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. M. (1974). Response Effects in Surveys. Chicago: Aldine.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, T.P., Moore, R.W. Gender interactions between interviewer and survey respondents: Issues of pornography and community standards. Sex Roles 28, 243–261 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289884

Download citation


  • Social Psychology
  • Empirical Work
  • Survey Respondent
  • Survey Response
  • Telephone Survey