Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Men's and women's self-confidence in persuasive, comforting, and justificatory communicative tasks

  • 177 Accesses

  • 15 Citations

Abstract

The self-confidence of men and women was assessed in three types of interpersonal communicative situations. Participants indicated anticipated level of success, evaluated their performance, and assessed the extent to which the outcome was due to ability and to effort. The most striking finding was higher self-confidence in women than in men in comforting tasks. No difference emerged in level of self-confidence between men and women in persuasive tasks. Men tended to anticipate more success in justifying decisions, but following their performance, did not rate either the quality of the performance or their ability higher than did women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Andrews, P. H. (1987). Gender differences in persuasive communication and attribution of success and failure. Human Communication Research, 13, 372–385.

  2. Beyer, S. (1990). Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 960–970.

  3. Bridges, J. S. (1988). Sex differences in occupational performance expectations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 75–90.

  4. Daubman, K. A., Heatherington, L., & Ahn, A. (1992). Gender and the self-presentation of academic achievement. Sex Roles, 27, 187–204.

  5. Dimitrovsky, L., Singer, J., & Yinon, Y. (1989). Masculine and feminine traits: Their relation to suitedness for and success in training for traditionally masculine and feminine army functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 839–847.

  6. Dovidio, J. F., Brown, C. E., Heltman, K., Ellyson, S. L., & Keating, C. F. (1988). Power displays between women and men in discussions of gender-linked tasks: A multichannel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 580–587.

  7. Frieze, I. H., Whitley, B. E., Jr., Hanusa, B. H., & McHugh, M. C. (1982). Assessing the theoretical models for sex differences in causal attributions for success and failure. Sex Roles, 8, 333–343.

  8. Lenney, E. (1977). Women's self-confidence in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 1–13.

  9. Lenney, E. (1981). What's fine for the gander isn't always good for the goose: Sex differences in self-confidence as a function of ability area and comparison with others. Sex Roles, 7, 905–923.

  10. McHugh, M. C., Frieze, I. H., & Hanusa, B. H. (1982). Attributions and sex differences in achievement: Problems and new perspectives. Sex Roles, 8, 467–479.

  11. O'Meara, J. D. (1989). Cross-sex friendship: Four basic challenges of an ignored relationship. Sex Roles, 21, 525–543.

  12. Post, R. D. (1981). Causal explanations of male and female academic performance as a function of sex-role bias. Sex Roles, 7, 691–698.

  13. Roberts, T. A. (1991). Gender and the influence of evaluations on self-assessments in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 297–308.

  14. Roberts, T. A., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1989). Sex differences in reactions to evaluative feedback. Sex Roles, 21, 725–747.

  15. Sleeper, L. A., & Nigro, G. N. (1987). It's not who you are but who you're with: Self-confidence in achievement settings. Sex Roles, 16, 57–69.

  16. Travis, C. B., & Burnett-Doering, J. (1982). The impact of sex, achievement domain, and conceptual orientation on causal attributions. Sex Roles, 8, 443–454.

Download references

Author information

Additional information

The author is indebted to members of the class in Introduction to Empirical Research Methods in Speech Communication for their contributions to this project.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clark, R.A. Men's and women's self-confidence in persuasive, comforting, and justificatory communicative tasks. Sex Roles 28, 553–567 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289680

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social Psychology
  • Striking Finding
  • Communicative Task
  • Communicative Situation
  • Anticipate Level