Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Perceptions of date and stranger rape: A difference in sex role expectations and rape-supportive beliefs

  • 730 Accesses

  • 83 Citations

Abstract

The sex role expectations and rape-supportive beliefs which are differentially applied to date and stranger rape were assessed. A sample of 62 college females and 33 males read one of three rape scenarios which varied according to the victim-perpetrator relationship (steady dating partners/acquaintances on a first date/strangers). Then participants rated the extent to which several sex role expectations and rape-supportive attitudes were applicable to the assault. MANOVAS and univariate ANOVAS showed that females' and males' perceptions of date rape, more than stranger rape, incorporated sex role expectations and that rape-supportive beliefs, primarily of males, were stronger in relation to steady date than first date or stranger rape. These findings are discussed in the context of the sex role analysis of rape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females' friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830–838.

  2. Abbey, A. (1987). Misperceptions of friendly behavior as sexual interest: A survey of naturally occurring incidents. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 173–194.

  3. Abbey, A., & Melby, C. (1986). The effects of nonverbal cues on gender differences in perception of sexual intent. Sex Roles, 15, 283–298.

  4. Acock, A. C., & Ireland, N. K. (1983). Attribution of blame in rape cases: The impact of norm violation, gender, and sex-role attitude. Sex Roles, 9, 179–193.

  5. Bridges, J. S., & McGrail, C. A. (1989). Attributions of responsibility for date and stranger rape. Sex Roles, 21, 273–286.

  6. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1984). Criminal victimization in the United States, 1982. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

  7. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.

  8. Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. M. (1983). Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger versus acquaintance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 344–356.

  9. Cherry, F. (1983). Gender roles and sexual violence. In E. R. Allgeier & N. B. McCormick (Eds.). Changing boundaries: Gender roles and sexual behavior. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.

  10. Clark, L., & Lewis, D. (1977). Rape: The price of coercive sexuality. Toronto: The Women's Press.

  11. Costin, F., Kibler, K. J., & Crank, C. (1982, August). Beliefs about rape and women's social roles. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

  12. Gerdes, E. P., Dammann, E. J., & Heilig, K. E. (1988). Perceptions of rape victims and assailants: Effects of physical attractiveness, acquaintance, and subject gender. Sex Roles, 19, 141–153.

  13. Giacopassi, D. J., & Dull, R. T. (1986). Gender and racial differences in the acceptance of rape myths within a college population. Sex Roles, 15, 63–75.

  14. Grauerholz, E., & Serpe, R. T. (1985). Initiation and response: The dynamics of sexual interaction. Sex Roles, 12, 1041–1059.

  15. Hall, E. R., Howard, J. A., & Boezio, S. L. (1986). Tolerance of rape: A sexist or antisocial attitude? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 10, 101–118.

  16. Jenkins, M. J., & Dambrot, F. H. (1987). The attribution of date rape: Observer's attitudes and sexual experiences and the dating situation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 875–898.

  17. Katz, B. L., & Burt, M. R. (1986, August). Effects of familiarity with the rapist on postrape recovery. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

  18. Koss, M. P. (1985). The hidden rape victim: Personality, attitudinal, and situational characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 193–212.

  19. Koss, M. P., Dinero, T. E., Seibel, C. A., & Cox, S. L. (1988). Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in the victim's experience? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 1–24.

  20. Koss, M. P., Leonard, K. E., Beezley, D. A., & Oros, C. J. (1985). Nonstranger sexual aggression: A discriminant analysis of the psychological characteristics of undetected offenders. Sex Roles, 12, 981–992.

  21. L'Armand, K. L., & Pepitone, A. (1982). Judgments of rape: A study of victim-rapist relationship and victim sexual history. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 134–139.

  22. Luginbuhl, J., & Mullin, C. (1981). Rape and responsibility: How and how much is the victim blamed? Sex Roles, 7, 547–559.

  23. Matlin, M. W. (1987). The psychology of women. New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.

  24. Mayerson, S. E., & Taylor, D. A. (1987). The effects of rape myth pornography on women's attitudes and the mediating role of sex role stereotyping. Sex Roles, 17, 321–338.

  25. McBroom, W. H. (1984). Changes in sex-role orientations: A five year longitudinal comparison. Sex Roles, 11, 583–592.

  26. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186–196.

  27. Rabkin, J. G. (1979). The epidemiology of forcible rape. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 49, 634–647.

  28. Ruch, L. O., & Chandler, S. M. (1983). Sexual assault trauma during the acute phrase: An exploratory model and multivariate analysis. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 174–185.

  29. Russell, D. E. H. (1984). Sexual exploitations: Rape, child sexual abuse and workplace harassment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

  30. Tetreault, P. A., & Barnett, M. A. (1987). Reactions to stranger and acquaintance rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 353–358.

  31. Warshaw, R. (1988). I never called it rape. New York: Harper & Row.

  32. Worchel, S., Cooper, J., & Goethals, G. R. (1988). Understanding social psychology. Chicago: Dorsey.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Judith S. Bridges.

Additional information

This research was supported by the University of Connecticut Research Foundation Grant #1171-000-22-00215-35-760. The author thanks Laurin Hafner for his help with the data analysis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bridges, J.S. Perceptions of date and stranger rape: A difference in sex role expectations and rape-supportive beliefs. Sex Roles 24, 291–307 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288303

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social Psychology
  • College Female
  • Role Expectation
  • Univariate ANOVAS
  • Date Rape