Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Evaluation and reinforcement: What do males and females really want to hear?

  • 41 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

This research was designed to note if males and females differ in their choices of the reinforcement and evaluation they assign to others. Thirty-one male and 31 female subjects viewed four videotapes of skilled and unskilled male and female speakers. Subjects assigned 10 of 40 statements varying in reinforcement value to each speaker and completed a five-item evaluation for each speech. Participants also completed a four-item measure to determine if they selected comments that they too would want to receive. Results indicated that males desire more positive reinforcement than females, although the two genders do not differ in their selection of evaluation. Also, subjects agreed that statements they selected were those they would find acceptable if applied to them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abramson, P. E., Goldberg, P. A., Greenburg, J. H., & Abramson, U. M. (1978). The talking platypus phenomenon: Competency ratings as a function of sex and professional status. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2, 114–124.

  2. Bedwell, J., & Sistrunk, F. (1973). Power, opportunity costs, and sex in a mixed-motive game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 219–226.

  3. Bigoness, W. J. (1976). Effect of applicant's sex, race, and performance on employers performance ratings: Some additional findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 80–84.

  4. Black, T. E., & Higbee, K. L. (1973). Effects of power, threat, and sex on exploitation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 382–388.

  5. Bock, D. G., Powell, L., Kitchens, J. T., & Flavin, J. W. (1977). The influence of sex difference in speech evaluation: Situational and media effects. Communication Education, 26, 143–153.

  6. Bridgewater, C. A. (1980). When a man talks, you listen. Psychology Today, 14, 25–26.

  7. Coutu, W. (1951). Role-playing vs. role-taking: An appeal for clarification. American Sociological Review, 16, 180–187.

  8. Deaux, K. (1976). Sex: A perspective on the attribution process. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  9. Deaux, K., & Taynor, J. (1973). Evaluation of male and female ability: Bias works two ways. Psychological Reports, 32, 261–262.

  10. Dipboyle, R. L., Arvey, R. D., & Terpstra, D. E. (1977). Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resume evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 288–294.

  11. Eagley, A. H. (1983). Gender and social influence: A social psychology analysis. American Psychologist, 38, 971–981.

  12. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

  13. Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Bochner, A. (1977). Beyond ingratiation: Factors affecting the communication of interpersonal evaluations. Communication Quarterly, 25, 11–17.

  14. Frank, F. D., & Drucker, J. (1977). The influence of evaluatee's sex on evaluation of a response of a managerial selection instrument. Sex Roles, 3, 59–64.

  15. Gladstein, G. A. (1984). The historical roots of contemporary empathy research. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 20, 38–59.

  16. Goldberg, P. (1968). Are women prejudiced against women? Trans-Action, 5, 28–30.

  17. Haefner, J. E. (1977). Sources of discrimination among employees: A survey investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 265–270.

  18. Hall, F. S., & Hall, D. T. (1976). Effects of job incumbent's race and sex on evaluations of managerial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 476–481.

  19. Hayes, D. T. (1977). Nonintellective predictors of public speaking ability and academic success in a basic college-level speech communication course. Unpublished doctoral dissertion. University of Missouri, Columbia.

  20. Hilpert, F., Kramer, C., & Clark, R. A. (1975). Participants' perceptions of self and partner in mixed-sex dyads. Central States Speech Journal, 26, 52–56.

  21. Jacobson, M. B., & Effertz, J. (1974). Sex roles and leadership perceptions of the leaders and the led. Organizational Behavior and Performance, 12, 383–396.

  22. Jaffe, D. S. (1986). Empathy, counteridentification, countertransference: A review, with some personal perspectives on the ‘analytic instrument.’ Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 55, 215–243.

  23. Katz, R. L. (1963). Empathy: Its nature and uses. New York: Free Press.

  24. Lao, R. C., Upchurch, W. H., Corwin, B. J., & Crossnickle, W. F. (1975). Biased attitudes toward females as indicated by ratings of intelligence and likeability. Psychological Reports, 37, 1315–1320.

  25. Lipps, T. (1935). Empathy, inner imitation, and sense-feelings. In M. M. Rader (Ed.). A modern book of esthetics: An anthology. New York: Holt. (Original work published in 1903).

  26. Lumeji, J. L. J. (1957). The methods of psychology and psychiatry. Assen, Netherlands: Tan Gorcum.

  27. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  28. McCroskey, J. C., Daly, J. A., Richmond, V. P., & Falcione, R. L. (1977). Studies of the relationship between communication apprehension and self-esteem. Human Communication Research, 3, 264–277.

  29. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago.

  30. Miller, G. R., & McReynolds, M. (1973). Male chauvanism and source competence: A research note. Speech Monographs, 40, 154–155.

  31. Mulac, A., & Torborg, L. L. (1980). Differences in perceptions created by syntactic-semantic productions of male and female speakers. Communication monographs, 47, 111–118.

  32. Muson, H. (1979). The biology of martyrdom. Psychology Today, 13, 39–41.

  33. Nieva, V. F., & Gutek, B. A. (1980). Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 5, 267–276.

  34. Paludi, M. A., & Baer, W. D. (1983). Goldberg revisited: What's in an author's name. Sex Roles, 9, 387–390.

  35. Pearson, J. C. (1985). Gender and communication. Dubuque, IA: W. C. Brown Publishers.

  36. Pearson, J. C. (1982). Gender, similarity, and source credibility. Paper presented at the Western Speech Communication Association convention, Denver, CO.

  37. Pearson, J. C. (1975). The effects of sex and sexism on the criticism of classroom speeches. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.

  38. Pearson, J. C., & Nelson, P. E. (1981). The basic speech communication course: An examination of instructor sex, student sex, and type of course on grading. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association convention, Anaheim, CA.

  39. Pfister, E. R. (1955). A study of the influence of certain selected factors on the ratings of speech performances. Unpublished Ed.D. dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

  40. Pheterson, G. T., Kiesler, S. B., & Goldberg, P. A. (1971). Evaluation of the performance of women as a function of their sex, achievement, and personal history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 110–114.

  41. Phillips, G. M., & Metzger, N. J. (1973). The reticent syndrome: Some theoretical considerations about etiology and treatment. Speech Monographs, 40, 220–230.

  42. Reik, T. (1948). Listening with the third ear. New York: Grove Press.

  43. Restak, R. M. (1979). The brain: The last frontier. New York: Doubleday.

  44. Rogers, C. (1951). Client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

  45. Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T. H. (1974). Influence of sex-role stereotypes on personnel decision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 9–14.

  46. Roznowska, A. (1985). Gender-related differences in the perception of other persons. Psychological Wychowawcza, 28, 166–178.

  47. Ruesch, J., & Bateson, G. (1951). Communication. New York: Norton.

  48. Scheler, M. (1954). The nature of sympathy (Peter Heath, Trans.). New Haven CT: Yale University Press. (Original work published 1913)

  49. Sprague, J. A. (1971). An investigation of the written critique behavior of college communication instructors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, Lafayette, IN.

  50. Stein, E. (1970). On the problem of empathy (Waltraut Stein, Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. (Original work published 1917)

  51. Stewart, D. A. (1956). Preface to empathy. New York: Philosophical Library.

  52. Tan-William, C. (1981). Cerebral hemispheric specialization of academically gifted and non-gifted male and female adolescents. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 15, 276–277.

  53. Taynor, J., & Deaux, K. (1975). Equity and perceived sex differences: Role behavior as defined by the task, the mode, and the action. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 32, 381–390.

  54. Taynor, J., & Deaux, K. (1973). When women are more deserving than men: Equity, attribution, and perceived sex differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 381–390.

  55. Truax, C. B., & Carkhuff, R. (1967). Toward effective counseling and psychotherapy. Chicago: Aldine.

  56. Vigliano, B. M. (1974). An investigation of the relationship between the sex of the speaker and the sex of the listener on message comprehension and judgment of speaker credibility. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University, New York.

  57. Wood, W., & Karten, S. J. (1986). Sex differences in interaction style as a product of perceived sex differences in competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 341–347.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McMahan, C.R. Evaluation and reinforcement: What do males and females really want to hear?. Sex Roles 24, 771–783 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288212

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social Psychology
  • Female Subject
  • Positive Reinforcement
  • Female Speaker