Male and female subjects were given an unlabeled definition of feminism, asked which of four labels they were most likely to use in reference to it, and asked to rate the defined concept on a variety of evaluative dimensions. The four labels were: equal rights for women (ERW), feminism (FEM), women's liberation (WLN), and women's lib (WLB). With the exception of ERW, which remained unchanged, the labels were evaluated differently than they had been in a previous study, in which subjects were assigned one of the four labels at random and asked to rate it. Specifically, it was found that when the labels are self-selected, FEM and WLN are rated more positively and WLB is rated more negatively, than when the labels are randomly assigned. Further, it was found that the various labels are not used with equal frequency, ERW and WLB being more commonly used than FEM and WLN.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Jacobson, M. B. A rose by any other name: Attitudes toward feminism as a function of its label. Sex Roles, 1979, 5, 365–371.
Webster's seventh new collegiate dictionary. Springfield, Mass.: Merriam, 1963.
About this article
Cite this article
Jacobson, M.B. You say potato and I say potahto: Attitudes toward feminism as a function of its subject-selected label. Sex Roles 7, 349–354 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288063
- Social Psychology
- Female Subject
- Equal Frequency
- Evaluative Dimension