Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Gender roles, biological sex, and predisposition to conflict management

  • 281 Accesses

  • 20 Citations

Abstract

The Bem Sex-Role Inventory and the Communication-Conflict Instrument were administered to 182 husbands and wives. Results suggest that gender-role classification is a more significant discriminator of communication behavior than is biological sex. Androgynous spouses, more than feminine though not significantly more so than masculine spouses, reported themselves to be the most disposed to handle conflict constructively. On the subscales of the conflict instrument, androgynous persons had significantly more positive feelings scores than either masculine or feminine persons, plus higher task energy and desire-for-control scores than feminine persons. Similarly, masculine persons reported a significantly greater predisposition to manage conflict constructively than did feminine persons, having higher task energy and desire-for-control scores. Undifferentiated persons reported the lowest scores for conflict management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bales, R. F., & Couch, A. S. The value profile: A factor analytic study of value statements. Sociological Inquiry 1969, 39 3–17.

  2. Bardwick, J. M. Psychology of women: A study of biocultural conflicts New York: Harper & Row, 1971.

  3. Baucom, D. H., & Danker-Brown, P. Influence of sex roles on the development of learned helplessness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1979, 47 928–936.

  4. Baxter, L. A., & Shepherd, T. L. Gender-role identity, sex of other, and affective relationship as determinants of interpersonal conflict-management styles. Sex Roles 1978, 6 813–825.

  5. Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1974, 42 155–162.

  6. Bem, S. L. Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975, 31 634–643.

  7. Bem, S. L. On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1977, 45 196–205.

  8. Bem, S. L., & Lenney, E. Sex-typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1976, 33 48–54.

  9. Berzins, J., Welling, M., & Wetter, P. A new measure of psychological androgyny based on the Personality Research Form. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1978, 46 126–138.

  10. Biaggio, M., & Nielson, E. Anxiety correlates of gender-role identity. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1976, 32 619–623.

  11. Brown, C. T., & Keller, P. W. Monologue to dialogue (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1979.

  12. Brown, C. T., Yelsma, P., & Keller, P. W. Communication-conflict predisposition: Development of a theory and an instrument. Human Relations 1981, 34 1103–1117.

  13. Carmer, S. G., & Swanson, M. R. An evaluation of ten multiple comparison procedure by Monte Carlo methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1973, 68 66–74.

  14. Coser, L. A. The Functions of social conflict. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1976.

  15. Crane, M., & Markus, H. Gender identity: The benefits of a self-schema approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1982, 43 1195–1197.

  16. Filley, A. C. Interpersonal conflict resolution. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, 1975.

  17. Frost, J. H., & Wilmot, W. W. Interpersonal conflict. Dubuque, Iowa: William C. Brown, 1978.

  18. Greenblatt, L., Hasenauer, J. E., & Freimuth, V. S. Psychological sex type and androgyny in the study of communication variables: Self-disclosure and communication apprehension. Human Communication Research 1980, 6 117–129.

  19. Hall, J. Conflict management survey. Houston, Tex.: Telemetrics, Inc., 1969.

  20. Ickes, W. J., & Barnes, R. D. Boys and girls together and alienated: On enacting stereotyped sex roles in mixed dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1978, 36 669–683.

  21. Kelly, R., & Worell, J. New formulations of sex roles and androgyny: A critical review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1977, 45 1101–1105.

  22. Kilmann, R., & Thomas, K. Interpersonal conflict-handling behavior as reflections of Jungian personality dimensions. Psychological Reports 1975, 37 971–980.

  23. Kirk, R. E. Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Monterey, Calif.: Brooks-Cole, 1982.

  24. Lefkowitz, M., Eron, L., Walder, L., & Huesmann, L. Growing up to be violent: A longitudinal study of the development of aggression. New York: Pergamon, 1977.

  25. Major, B., Carnevale, P. J. D., & Deaux, K. A different perspective on androgyny: Evaluations of masculine and feminine personality characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981, 41 988–1001.

  26. Millimet, C. R., & Votta, R. P. Acquiescence and the Bem gender-role inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment 1979, 43 164–165.

  27. Minnegerode, F. Attitudes toward women, gender-role stereotyping, and locus of control. Psychological Reports 1976, 38 1301–1302.

  28. Montgomery, C., & Burgoon, M. An experimental study of the interaction effects of sex and androgyny on attitude change. Communication Monographs 1977, 44 130–135.

  29. Mortenson, C. D., Arnstrom, P. H., & Lustig, M. The measurement of verbal predispositions: Scale development and application. Human Communication Research 1977, 2 146–159.

  30. Orlofsky, J. Sex role orientation, identity formation, and self-esteem in college men and women. Sex Roles 1977, 3 561–575.

  31. Orlofsky, J. L., & Windle, M. T. Gender-role orientation, behavioral adaptability and personal adjustment. Sex Roles 1978, 4 801–811.

  32. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1957.

  33. Raush, H., Barry, W. A., Hertel, R. K., & Swain, M. A. Communication, conflict and marriage. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.

  34. Sears, J., Maccoby, E., & Levin, H. Patterns of child rearing. Evanston, Ill.: Row Peterson, 1957.

  35. Shaw, J. S. Psychological androgyny and stressful life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1982, 43 145–153.

  36. Small, A. C., Erdwins, C., & Gross, R. B. A comparison of the Bem gender-role inventory and the Heilbrun masculinity and femininity scales. Journal of Personality Assessment 1979, 43 393–395.

  37. Spence, J., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. Rating of self and peers on sex role attributes on their relations to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975, 32 29–39.

  38. Stoline, M. R. The status of multiple comparison: Simultaneous estimation of all pairwise comparison in one-way ANOVA designs. American Statistician 1981, 35 134–141.

  39. Strodtbeck, F., & Mann, R. Gender-role differentiation in jury deliberations. Sociometry 1956, 19 3–11.

  40. Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. Tuxedo, N.Y.: XICOM, Inc., 1974.

  41. Waller, R. A., & Duncan, D. B. A Bayes rule for the symmetric multiple comparisons problem. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1969, 64 1484–1503.

  42. Wiggens, J., & Holzmuller, A. Psychological androgyny and interpersonal behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1978, 46 40–52.

  43. Wilmot, W. W. Dyadic communication: A transactional perspective. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1975.

  44. Yelsma, P. Conflict predispositions: Differences between happy and clinical couples. American Journal of Family Therapy 1981, 9 57–63.

  45. Zimmermann, D. H., & West, C. Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Differences and dominance. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, 1975. Pp. 105–129.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yelsma, P., Brown, C.T. Gender roles, biological sex, and predisposition to conflict management. Sex Roles 12, 731–747 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287867

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social Psychology
  • Lower Score
  • Gender Role
  • Great Predisposition
  • Positive Feeling