Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Relationship factors as predictors of causal attributions about sexual experiences

  • 45 Accesses

  • 9 Citations


This study investigated the relation between general relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction by seeking to identify which aspects of one's relationship would predict attributions made about sexual experiences. Subjects were 233 male and female graduate and undergraduate students who were asked to rate the extent to which self, partner, situational, and relationship factors were causes for sexually satisfying and unsatisfying experiences. General relationship satisfaction, phase of relationship involvement, depth of sexual involvement, importance of sexual satisfaction to overall relationship contentment, sexual history, and gender were variables entered into multiple regression analysis to identify the “best fit” model predicting causal attributions to each dimension. Findings revealed that relationship satisfaction and gender appeared to contribute to a reliable “best fit” model which predicted attributions to the sexual relationship for satisfying sexual outcomes. Sexual history was a strong predictor variable, occurring in the best fit models for all but two attribution dimensions; other relationship variables were not strong contributors to predictive models. Finally, the inclusion of an interpersonal attributional dimension, the relationship, appeared to be highly relevant when persons identified explanations for their sexual experience outcomes. Implications of the findings and suggestions for further research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Barbach, L. For yourself: The fulfillment of female sexuality. New York: Anchor Press, 1975.

  2. Bem, D. Sex perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6). New York: Academic Press, 1972. Pp. 1–6.

  3. Bradburn, N. M., & Sudman, S. Improving interview methods and questionnaire design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.

  4. Cheung, P., & Hudson, W. Assessment of marital discord in social work practice: A revalidation of the Index of Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Social Services Research 1981, 4 51–55.

  5. Grunebaum, H. Thoughts on love, sex and commitment. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 1976, 2 277–283.

  6. Hagen, R., The bio-sexual factor. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1979.

  7. Harvey, J., Wells, G., & Alvarez, M. Attribution in the context of conflicts and separation in close relationships. In J. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research. (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erllbaum, 1978, Pp. 235–260.

  8. Heider, F. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley, 1958.

  9. Hendrick, S. S. Self-disclosure and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981, 40 1150–1159.

  10. Hudson, W., & Glisson, D. Assessment of marital discord in social work practice. Social Service Review 1976, 50 293–311.

  11. Jones, E., & Davis, K. From acts to disposition: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1965.

  12. Kelley, H., & Michela, J. Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology 1980, 31 457–501.

  13. Levinger, G. Toward the analysis of close relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1980, 16 510–544.

  14. Masters, W., & Johnson, V. Human sexual inadequacy. Boston: Little, Brown, 1970.

  15. Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin 1975, 82 213–225.

  16. Mosher, D. Three dimensions of sexual involvement. Journal of Sex Research 1980, 16 1–42.

  17. Murstein, B., & Holden, C. Sexual behavior and correlates among college students. Adolescence 1979, 14 625–639.

  18. Newman, H. Communication within ongoing intimate relationships: An attributional perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1981, 7 59–70.

  19. Orvis, B., Kelley, H., & Butler, D. Attributional conflict in young couples. In J. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. I). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1976. Pp. 353–386.

  20. Pennebaker, J. W., & Epstein, D. Implicit psychology: Effects of common beliefs and idiosyncratic responses on symptom reporting, Journal of Personality in press.

  21. Peplau, L., Rubin, A., & Hill, C. Sexual intimacy in dating relationships. Journal of Social Issues 1977, 33 86–109.

  22. Rizley, R. Depression and distortion in the attribution of causality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1978, 87 32–48.

  23. Rosenfield, D., & Stephan, W. G. Sex differences in attributions for sex-typed tasks. Journal of Personality 1978, 46 244–259.

  24. Sager, C. Sex as a reflection of the total relationship. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 1976, 2 3–5.

  25. Scanzoni, J. Social exchange and behavioral interdependence. In T. Huston & R. Burgess (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships. New York: Academic Press, 1979, Pp. 61–98.

  26. Snyder, M. C., Stephan, W. G., & Rosenfield, D. Attributional egotism. In H. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1978.

  27. Walen, S. Cognitive factors in sexual behavior. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 1980, 6 87–101.

  28. Webb, E., Campbell, D., Schwartz, R. Sechrest, L., & Grove, J. Non-reactive measures in the social sciences (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1981.

  29. Weiner, B. (Ed.). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press, 1974.

  30. Welsh, R. L., & Huston, A. C. Effects of induced success/failure and attributions on the problem-solving behavior of psychologically androgynous and feminine women. Journal of Personality 1982, 50 81–97.

  31. Younger, M. Handbook of linear regression. Mass.: Duxbury Press, 1979, Pp. 495–497.

  32. Zuckerman, M. Attribution of success and failure revisited; or the motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality 1979, 47 245–287.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frank, D., Maass, A. Relationship factors as predictors of causal attributions about sexual experiences. Sex Roles 12, 697–711 (1985).

Download citation


  • Sexual Experience
  • Sexual Relationship
  • Sexual Satisfaction
  • Relationship Satisfaction
  • Causal Attribution