Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Women's language: Uncertainty or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality?

Abstract

Six differences in linguistic behavior in same-sex and mixed-sex problem-solving groups were explored. Small groups of all women, all men, and mixed sex were run and videotaped. Linguistic behavior was assessed through a content analysis of four syntactic categories: intensifiers, modal constructions, tag questions, and imperative constructions in question form. Support was found for the hypothesis of Key (1975) and Lakoff (1975) that women, as compared with men, use more linguistic categories that connote uncertainty. Support was also found for these authors' hypotheses that (1) women use more linguistic forms that connote uncertainty when men are present than when men are absent, and (2) men are more likely to interrupt women than women are likely to interrupt men. The results are discussed from the perspectives of women's role (supportive behavior and minority status) and women's culture (interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adams, M. The compassion trap. In V. Gornick & J. B. Moran (Eds.), Women in sexist society. New York: Basic Books, 1971.

  2. Barron, N. Sex-typed language: The production of grammatical cases. Acta Sociologica, 1971, 14(1–2), 24–42.

  3. Bernard, J. The sex game. New York: Atheneum, 1972.

  4. Bernard, J. My four revolutions: An autobiographical history of the ASA. In Joan Huber (Ed.), Changing women in a changing society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.

  5. Bernstein, B. Some sociological determinants of perception: An inquiry into sub-cultural differences. British Journal of Sociology, 1958, 9, 159–174.

  6. Bernstein, B. Class, codes and control, I: Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971.

  7. Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 20(20), 59–78.

  8. Callary, R. E. Status perception through syntax. Language and Speech, 1974, 17(20), 187–192.

  9. Clifton, A. K., & Lee, D. E. Self-destructive consequences of sex role socialization. Suicide, 1976, 6(1), in press.

  10. Cooper, M., & Delheimer, V. Personal communication about research in progress, 1976.

  11. Gilley, H. M., & Summers, C. S. Sex differences in the use of hostile verbs. Journal of Psychology, 1970, 76(September), 33–37.

  12. Hacker, H. Women as a minority group. Social Forces, 1951, 30(October), 60–69.

  13. Henley, N., & Freeman, J. The sexual politics of interpersonal behavior. In S. Cox (Ed.), Female psychology: The emerging self. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1976.

  14. Horton, J. Time and cool people. Transaction, 1967, 4(April), 5–12.

  15. Jesperson, O. The woman. In Language: Its nature, development, and origin. New York: W. W. Norton, 1921, 237–254.

  16. Jesperson, O. Sex and gender. In The Philosophy of Grammar. New York: W. W. Norton, 1924, 243–266.

  17. Kemnitzer, L. S. Language learning and socialization. Urban Life and Culture, 1973, 1 (January), 363–378.

  18. Key, M. R. Male/female language. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press, 1975.

  19. Kikpatrick, J. Political woman. New York: Basic Books, 1974.

  20. Kluckhohn, F. American women and American values. In L. Bryson (Ed.), Facing future risks. New York: Harper, 1953, 175–199.

  21. Kramer, C. Folk linguistics: Wishy-washy mommy talk. Psychology Today, 1974, 8(1), 82–85.

  22. Kutner, N. G., & Brogan, D. An investigation of sex-related slang vocabulary and sex-role orientation among male and female university students. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1974, 36(3), 474–484.

  23. Lakoff, R. Language and woman's place. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.

  24. Lee, D. E., & Clifton, A. K. Women as a minority. Unpublished manuscript, Illinois State University, 1976.

  25. Rokeach, M. The nature of human values. New York: Free Press, 1973.

  26. Sapir, E. Abnormal types of speech in Nootka. In David G. Mandelbaum (Ed.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture, and personality. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1968.

  27. Schwartz, G., & Merten, D. The language of adolescence: An anthropological approach to the youth culture. American Journal of Sociology, 1967, 72(March), 453–468.

  28. Trugill, P. Sociolinguistics. Baltimore, Md.: Penguin, 1974.

  29. Walsh, B., & Leonard, W. Usage of terms of sexual intercourse by men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1974, 3(4), 373–376.

  30. Wheeler, S. Socialization in correctional institutions. In David A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969, 1005–1023.

  31. Whorf, B. L. Language, thought and reality: Selected writings. J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1958.

  32. Wolfram, W. A. sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negroes. Speech at Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, D.C., 1969.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McMillan, J.R., Clifton, A.K., McGrath, D. et al. Women's language: Uncertainty or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality?. Sex Roles 3, 545–559 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287838

Download citation

Keywords

  • Small Group
  • Social Psychology
  • Content Analysis
  • Minority Status
  • Supportive Behavior