Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

TV commercials as achievement scripts for women

Abstract

This study suggests that sex stereotypes implicitly enacted, but never explicitly articulated, in TV commercials may inhibit women's achievement aspirations. Men and women (N=180) viewed locally produced replicas of four current, sex-stereotyped commercials, or four replicas that were identical except that the sex roles were reversed, or (control) named their favorite TV programs. All subjects then wrote an essay imagining their lives “10 years from now.” The essays were coded for achievement and homemaking themes. Women who viewed traditional commercials deemphasized achievement in favor of homemaking, compared to men and compared to women who had seen reversed role commercials. The reversed role commercials eliminated the sex difference in net achievement focus. Control subjects were indistinguishable from their same-sex counterparts in the traditional condition. The results identified some social changes needed to make “equality of opportunity” a social reality for women as well as men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abelson, R. P. A script theory of understanding, attitude, and behavior. In J. Carroll & T. Payne (Eds.), Cognition and social behavior. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1976.

  2. Asch, S. E. Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 1956, 70(No. 9).

  3. Astin, H. S. Career profiles of women doctorates. In A. S. Rossi & A. Calderwood (Eds.), Academic women on the move. New York: Russell Sage, 1973.

  4. Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. J. Teaching the woman to know her place: The power of a non-conscious ideology. In M. H. Garskoff (Ed.), Roles women play. Belmont, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1971.

  5. Chulay, C., & Frances, S. The image of the female child on Saturday morning television commercials, 174, pp. 1–13. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 095 603)

  6. Comstock, G., Chaffee, S., Katzman, N., McCombs, M., & Roberts, D. Television and human behavior. New York: Columbia University Press, 1978.

  7. Council of Economic Advisers. Economic report to the President. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973.

  8. Dominick, J. R., & Rauch, G. E. The image of women in network TV commercials. Journal of Broadcasting, 1972, 16, 259–265.

  9. Festinger, L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 1954, 7, 117–140.

  10. Flerx, V. C., Fidler, D. S., & Rogers, R. W. Sex role stereotypes: Developmental aspects and early intervention. Child Development, 1976, 47, 998–1007.

  11. Geis, F. L., Brown, V., Jennings (Walstedt), J., & Corrado-Taylor, D. Sex versus status in sex-associated stereotypes. Sex Roles, in press.

  12. Holsti, O. R. Content analysis for the social sciences and the humanities. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969.

  13. Horner, M. S. Toward an understanding of achievement-related conflicts in women. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 157–175.

  14. Jennings (Walstedt), J., Geis, F. L., & Brown, V. The influence of television commercials on women's self-confidence and independence of judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 38, 203–210.

  15. Jones, R. A. Self-fulfilling prophecies: Social, psychological, and physiological effects of expectancies. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1977.

  16. Komisar, L. The image of women in advertising. In V. Gornick & B. K. Moran (Eds.), Woman in sexist society: Studies in power and powerlessness. New York: Signet, 1972.

  17. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1974.

  18. Roby, P. Institutional barriers to women students in higher education. In A. S. Rossi & A. Calderwood (Eds.), Academic women on the move. New York: Russell Sage, 1973.

  19. Rosenthal, R. On the social psychology of the self-fulfilling prophecy: Further evidence for Pygmalion effects and their mediating mechanisms (Module 53). New York: MSS Modular Publications, 1974.

  20. Stein, A. H., & Bailey, M. M. The socialization of achievement motivation in females. In M. T. Mednick, S. S. Tangri, & L. W. Hoffman (Eds.), Women and achievement. New York: Halsted Press, 1975.

  21. Sternglanz, S. H., & Serbin, L. A. Sex role stereotyping in children's television programs. Developmental Psychology, 1974, 10, 710–715.

  22. Walstedt, J. J. The altruistic other orientation: An exploration of female powerlessness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1977, 2, 162–176.

  23. Walstedt, J. J. Women as marginals. Psychological Reports, 1974, 34, 639–646.

  24. Winer, B. J. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geis, F.L., Brown, V., Jennings (Walstedt), J. et al. TV commercials as achievement scripts for women. Sex Roles 10, 513–525 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287260

Download citation

Keywords

  • Control Subject
  • Social Psychology
  • Social Change
  • Social Reality
  • Reversed Role