Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Role of two operators in regulating the plasmid-borne raf operon of Escherichia coli

  • 27 Accesses

  • 5 Citations

Abstract

The plasmid-borne raf operon encodes functions required for the inducible uptake and utilization of raffinose in Escherichia coli K12. The expression of three structural genes for α-galactosidase (rafA), Raf permease (rajB) and sucrose hydrolase (rafD) is negatively controlled by the binding of RafR repressor (rafR) to two operator sites, O1 and O2, that flank the − 35 sequence of the raf promoter, PA. In vitro, O1 and 02 are occupied on increasing the concentration of RafR, without detectable preference for one site or the other or any indication of cooperative binding. Nucleotide substitutions at positions 3, 4 or 5 in an operator half-site prevented repressor binding, supporting a model that postulates specific interactions of these base pairs with the recognition helix of RafR. To study the role of each operator site, we have compared by gel shift analysis the binding of purified RafR repressor to DNA fragments containing the original 0102 configuration or mutant O1 or 02. When either one of the two operators was inactivated by site-directed mutagenesis, both 01 and 02 exhibited the same affinity for repressor and the same sensitivity to arrest of repressor binding by the natural inducer, melibiose. However, in the native 0102 configuration, simultaneous binding of RafR to both operators was sterically hindered, leading to a 13-fold decrease in the intrinsic affinity of an operator site for repressor, once the other site had been occupied. To assess the role of each operator in vivo, rafA was used as a reporter gene. A 1200-fold repression (100%) was exerted by RafR binding to the native O1O2 configuration, whereas 02 alone exerted 45% and 01 alone 6% repression of rafA transcription. The differential effects of 01 versus 02 on transcription (despite matching affinities of 01 and 02 for repressor) suggest that positioning of the O2-repressor complex between the — 35 and —10 signals is crucial for transcription control and that repressor binding to the upstream 01 serves to enhance this effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ansari AZ, Chael ML, O'Halloran TV (1992) Allosteric underwinding of DNA is a critical step in positive control of transcription by Hg-MerR. Nature 355:87–89

  2. Aslanidis C (1987) Totalsequenz des raf Operons: Struktur, Funktionen und Regulation. PhD thesis, University of Regensburg, FRG

  3. Aslanidis C, Schmitt R (1990) Regulatory elements of the rafnose operon: nucleotide sequences of operator and repressor genes. J Bacteriol 172:2178–2180

  4. Aslanidis C, Schmid K, Schmitt R (1989) Nucleotide sequences and operon structure of plasmid-borne genes mediating uptake and utilization of raffinose in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 171:6753–6763

  5. Aslanidis C, Muiznieks I, Schmitt R (1990) Successive binding of rat repressor to adjacent raf operator sites in vitro. Mol Gen Genet 223:297–304

  6. Bradford M (1976) A rapid method for the quantition of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254

  7. Dunn TM, Hahn S, Ogden S, Schleif RF (1984) An operator at −280 base pairs that is required for repression of araBAD operon promoter: addition of DNA helical turns between the operator and promoter cyclically hinders repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:5017–5020

  8. Eismann E, Muffler-Hill B (1990) lac repressor forms stable loops in vitro with supercoiled wild type lac DNA containing all three natural lac operators. J Mol Biol 213:763–775

  9. Eismann E, von Wilcken-Bergmann B, Müller-Hill B (1987) Specific destruction of the second lac operator decreases the the repression of lac operon in Escherichia coli fivefold. J Mol Biol 195:949–952

  10. Fried M, Crothers DM (1981) Equilibria and kinetics of lac repressor-operator interactions by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res 9:6505–6525

  11. Fritz H-J, Bicknäse H, Gleumes B, Heibach C, Roshsahl S, Ehring R (1983) Characterization of two mutations in Escherichia coli galE gene inactivating the second galactose operator and comparative studies of repressor binding. EMBO J 2:2129–2135

  12. Garner MM, Revzin A (1981) A gel electrophoresis method for quantifying the binding of proteins to specific DNA regions: applications to E. coli lactose operon regulatory system. Nucleic Acids Res 9:3047–3060

  13. Hanahan D (1983) Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol 166:557–568

  14. Hudson JM, Fried M (1990) Cooperative interactions between the catabolite repressor gene activator protein and the lac repressor at the lactose promoter. J Mol Biol 214:381–396

  15. Irani MH, Orosz L, Adhya S (1983) A control element within a structural gene: the gal operon of Escherichia coli. Cell 32:783–787

  16. Jaenicke R, Muiznieks I, Aslanidis C, Schmitt R (1990) Ultracentrifugal analysis of the quartenary structure of raf repressor from Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett 260:233–235

  17. Krämer H, Niemöller M, Amouyal M, Revet B, von Wilcken-Bergmann B, Müller-Hill B (1987) lac repressor forms loops with linear DNA carrying two suitably spaced lac operators. EMBO J 6:1481–1491

  18. Lanzer M, Bujard H (1988) Promoters largely determine the efficiency of repressor action. Proc Nall Acad Sci USA 85:8973–8977

  19. Lee J, Goldfarb A (1991) lac repressor acts by modifying the initial transcribing complex so that it cannot leave the promoter. Cell 66:793–798

  20. Lehming N, Sartorius J, Niemöller M, Genenger G, von WilckenBergmann B, Müller-Hill B (1987) The interactions of the recognition helix of lac repressor with lac operator. EMBO J 6:3145–3153

  21. Lehming N, Sartorius J, Kisters-Woike B, von Wilcken-Bergmann B, Müller-Hill B (1990) Mutant lac repressors with new specificities hint at rules for protein-DNA recognition. EMBO J 9:615–621

  22. Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York

  23. Oehler S, Eismann E, Kramer H, Müller-Hill B (1990) The three operators of the lac operon cooperate in repression. EMBO J 9:973–981

  24. Pabo CO, Sauer RT (1984) Protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem 53:293–321

  25. Sartorius J, Lehming N, Kisters B, von Wickeln-Bergmann B, Müller-Hill B (1989) lac repressor mutants with double or triple exchanges in the recognition helix bind specifically to lac operator variants with multiple exchanges. EMBO J 8:1265–1270

  26. Schmid K, Schmitt R (1976) Raffinose metabolism in Escherichia coli K12. Purification and properties of a new a-galactosidase specified by a transmissable plasmid. Eur J Biochem 67:95–104

  27. Schmid K, Ritschewald S, Schmitt R (1979) Relationships among raffinose plasmids determined by the immunochemical crossreaction of their α-galactosidases. J Gen Microbiol 114: 477–481

  28. Schmitt R, Mattes R, Schmid K, Altenbuchner J (1979) Raf plasmids in strains of Escherichia coli and their possible role in enteropathogeny. In: Timmis KN, Pühler A (eds) Plasmids of medical, environmental and commercial interest. Elsevier North Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, pp 199–210

  29. Straney DC, Straney SB, Crothers DM (1989) Synergy between Escherichia coli CAP protein and RNA polymerase in lac promoter open complexes. J Mol Biol 206:41–57

  30. Stueber D, Bujard H (1982) Transcription from efficient promoters can interfere with plasmid replication and diminish expression of plasmid specified genes. EMBO J 1:1399–1404

  31. Tuggle CK, Fuchs JA (1986) Regulation of the operon encoding ribonucleotide reductase in Escherichia coli: evidence for both positive and negative control. EMBO J 5:1077–1081

  32. Valentin-Hansen P, Albrechtsen B, Love Larsen JE (1986) DNA-protein recognition: demonstration of three genetically separated operator elements that are required for repression of Escherichia coli deoCABD promoters by DeoR repressor. EMBO J 5:2015–2021

  33. Vieira J, Messing J (1982) The pUC plasmids. An M13mp7-derived system for insertion mutagenesis and sequencing with synthetic primers. Gene 33:259–268

  34. Weickert MJ, Adhya S (1992) A family of bacterial regulators homologous to Gal and Lac repressors. J Biol Chem 267:15869–15874

  35. Yanisch-Perron C, Vieira J, Messing J (1985) Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp8 and pCU19 vectors. Gene 33:103–119

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Rüdiger Schmitt.

Additional information

Communicated by W Goebel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muiznieks, I., Schmitt, R. Role of two operators in regulating the plasmid-borne raf operon of Escherichia coli . Molec. Gen. Genet. 242, 90–99 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00277352

Download citation

Key words

  • raf operon
  • Dual operator control
  • Repressor-operator binding
  • Site-directed mutagenesis
  • Gel retardation