Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Quantum dynamical reduction and reality: Replacing probability densities with densities in real space

  • 22 Accesses

Abstract

Consideration is given to recent attempts to solve the objectification problem of quantum mechanics by considering nonlinear and stochastic modifications of Schrödinger's evolution equation. Such theories agree with all predictions of standard quantum mechanics concerning microsystems but forbid the occurrence of superpositions of macroscopically different states. It is shown that the appropriate interpretation for such theories is obtained by replacing the probability densities of standard quantum mechanics with mass densities in real space. Criteria allowing a precise characterization of the idea of similarity and difference of macroscopic situations are presented and it is shown how they lead to a theoretical picture which is fully compatible with a macrorealistic position about natural phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. AicardiF., BorsellinoA., GhirardiG. C., and GrassiR.: 1991, ‘Dynamical Models for State Vector Reduction: do they Ensure that Measurements Have Outcomes?’, Foundations of Physics Letters 4, 109–128.

  2. Bell, J. S.: 1986, ‘Six Possible Worlds of Quantum Mechanics’, in Proceedings of the Nobel Symposium 65: Possible Worlds in Arts and Sciences, Stockholm, pp. 11–15.

  3. Bell, J. S.: 1987, ‘Are there Quantum Jumps?’, in C. W. Kilmister (ed.), Schrödinger. Centenary celebration of a polymath, Cambridge University Press, pp. 41–52.

  4. BellJ. S.: 1989, ‘Towards an Exact Quantum Mechanics’, in S.Deser and R. J.Finkelstein (eds.), Themes in Contemporary Physics II Singapore, Word Scientific, pp. 1–26.

  5. BellJ. S.: 1990, ‘Against Measurement’, in A. I.Miller (ed.), Sixty-two Years of Uncertainity, New York, Plenum Press, pp. 17–31.

  6. BohmD.: 1952a, ‘A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden” Variables. I’, Physical Review 85, 166–79.

  7. BohmD.: 1952b, ‘A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden” Variables. II’, Physical Review 85, 180–93.

  8. BohmD. and HileyB. J.: 1984, ‘Measurement Understood through the Quantum Potential Approach’, Foundations of Physics 14, 255–74.

  9. GhirardiG. C., RiminiA., and WeberT.: 1986, ‘Unified Dynamics for Microscopic and Macroscopic Systems’, Physical Review D34, 470–91.

  10. GhirardiG. C., GrassiR., and PearleP.: 1990, ‘Relativistic Dynamical Reduction Models: General Framework and Examples’, Foundations of Physics 20, 1271–1316.

  11. GhirardiG. C., PearleP., and RiminiA.: 1990, ‘Markov Processes in Hilbert Space and Continuous Spontaneous Localization of Systems of Identical Particles’, Physical Review A42, 78–89.

  12. GhirardiG. C. and RiminiA.: 1990, ‘Old and New Ideas in the Theory of Quantum Measurement’, in A. I.Miller (ed.), Sixty-two Years of Uncertainity, New York, Plenum Press, pp. 167–91.

  13. GhirardiG. C., GrassiR., and PearleP.: 1991, ‘Relativistic Dynamical Reduction Models and Nonlocality’, in P.Lahti and P.Mittelstaedt (eds.), Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1990, Singapore, World Scientific, pp. 109–123.

  14. GhirardiG. C., GrassiR., ButterfieldJ., and FlemingG.: 1993, ‘Parameter Dependence and Outcome Dependence in Dynamical Models for State Vector Reduction’, Foundations of Physics 23, 341–64.

  15. GhirardiG. C. and GrassiR.: 1994, ‘Outcome Predictions and Property Attribution: The EPR Argument Reconsidered’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 25, 397–423.

  16. GhirardiG. C., GrassiR., and BenattiF.: 1995, ‘Describing the Macroscopic World: Closing the Circle within The Dynamical Reduction Program’, Foundations of Physics 25, 5–38.

  17. PearleP.: 1989, ‘Combining Stochastic Dynamical State-vector Reduction with Spontaneous Localizations’, Physical Review A39, 2277–89.

  18. PearleP.: 1990, ‘Toward a Relativistic Theory of Statevector Reduction’, in A. I.Miller (ed.), Sixty-two Years of Uncertainity, New York, Plenum Press, pp. 193–214.

  19. PearleP. and SquiresE.: 1994, ‘Bound State Excitation, Nucleon decay Experiments, and Models of Wave Function Collapse’, Physical Review Letters 73, 1–5.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghirardi, G. Quantum dynamical reduction and reality: Replacing probability densities with densities in real space. Erkenntnis 45, 349–365 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00276799

Download citation

Keywords

  • Probability Density
  • Quantum Mechanic
  • Evolution Equation
  • Mass Density
  • Natural Phenomenon