Three methods of recurrent selection using doubled haploids (DH) are compared with the same resources: individual line selection (with one DH line per plant), selection between and within families, and selection index of family and line within family values. It seems that for low heritabilities at the individual level, the selection index method is the most efficient method, followed by the selection between and within families. Because of the difficulty in optimizing selection intensities, the selection between and within families can be less efficient than individual line selection. For very low heritabilities, it will be better to use selection index with a relatively low number of lines per haploidized plant, to minimize the rate of decrease of the effective population size. For a large range of situations, recurrent selection with only one DH line per plant seems one of the more efficient and the simpler methods.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Gallais A (1978) Le concept de valeur en lignées et son utilisation possible en amélioration des plantes. Ann Amélior Plant 29:1–22
Gallais A (1979) The concept of varietal ability in plant breeding. Euphytica 28:811–823
Gallais A (1986) Place de l'haplodiploidisation dans les schémas de sélection. Le Sélectionneur français 36:47–58
Gallais A (1988) A method of line development using doubled haploids: the single double haploid descent recurrent selection. Theor Appl Genet 75:330–332
Lush JL (1943) Family merit and individual merit as bases for selection. Am Nat 81:241–261, 362–379
Communicated by A. R. Hallauer
About this article
Cite this article
Gallais, A. Optimization of recurrent selection on the phenotypic value of doubled haploid lines. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 77, 501–504 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00274270
- Line development