Advertisement

Child's Nervous System

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 115–120 | Cite as

Magnetic resonance imaging of the child's brain

  • Beverly L. Hershey
  • Robert A. Zimmerman
Original Papers

Abstract

The most significant difference between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) is that the former graphic representation of the cerebrospinal axis and its structures does not use ionizing radiation or the injection of contrast material. The physical principles of MRI and the very characteristic appearances of some pathological processes common in children require special study. Low-proton density areas are generally dark; the short T1 value is responsible for white matter appearing clear; inversion recovery sequences permit study of the progression of myelination.

Key words

Magnetic resonance imaging White matter Gray matter Congenital cerebrospinal anomalies Brain tumors Vascular abnormalities 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bailes D, Young I, Thomas D, Straughan K, Bydder G, Steiner R (1982) NMR imaging of the brain using spin-echo sequences. Clin Radiol 33:395–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bradley W, Newton T, Crooks L (1983) Advanced imaging techniques (Modern neuroradiology, vol 2). Clavadel Press, San AnselmoGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brant-Zawadzki M, Davis P, Crooks L, Mills C, Normal D, Newton T, Sheldon P, Kaufman L (1983) NMR demonstration of cerebral abnormalities: comparison with CT. AJR 140:847–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bydder G, Steiner R, Young I, Hall A, Thomas D, Marshall J, Pallis C, Legg N (1982) Clinical NMR imaging of the brain: 140 cases. AJR 139:215–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bydder G, Steiner R, Thomas D, Marshall J, Gilderdale D, Young I (1983) Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the posterior fossa: 50 cases. Clin Radiol 34:173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    General Electric (1982) NMR: a perspective on imaging. General Electric Company, MilwaukeeGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Han J, Bonstelle C, Kaufman B, Benson J, Alfidi R, Clampitt M, Van Dyke C, Huss R (1984) Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the brainstem. Radiology 150:705–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Han J, Benson J, Kaufman B, Rekate H, Alfidi R, Huss R, Sacco D, Yoon Y, Morrison S (1985) MRI imaging of pediatric cerebral abnormalities. J Comput Assist Tomogr 9:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harms S, Morgan T, Yamanashi W, Harle T, Dodd G (1984) Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Radiographics 4:26–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnson M, Pennock J, Bydder G, Steiner R, Thomas D, Hayward R, Bryant D, Payne J, Levene M, Whitelaw A, Dubowitz L, Dubowitz V (1983) Clinical NMR imaging of the brain in children: normal and neurologic disease. AJR 141:1005–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee B, Kneeland J, Deck M, Cahill P (1984) Posterior fossa lesions: magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 153:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Levene M, Whitelaw A, Dubowitz V, Bydder G, Steiner R, Randell C, Young I (1982) Nuclear magnetic resonance of the brain in children. Br Med J 285:774–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beverly L. Hershey
    • 1
  • Robert A. Zimmerman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyHospital of the University of Pennsylvania, and The Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations