Advertisement

Plant Cell Reports

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 216–219 | Cite as

Partial purification and characterization of a NADPH dependent tetrahydroalstonine synthase from Catharanthus roseus cell suspension cultures

  • T. Hemscheidt
  • M. H. Zenk
Article

Abstract

A new enzyme was discovered which specifically hydrogenates the iminium form of cathenamine at position 21 to yield the heteroyohimbine alkaloid tetrahydroalstonine. The enzyme was partially purified (35-fold) from Catharanthus roseus cell suspension cultures. It was shown to use exclusively NADPH as reductant, the pH optimum is at 6.6, the temperature optimum at 30°C, the half life of the soluble enzyme preparation is 26 min at 37°C, and the molecular weight is 81 000 ± 3%. Evidence is presented for the occurrence of two distinct and different cathenamine reductases, one reducing the iminium form of this central intermediate to give tetrahydroalstonine, the other one reducing cathenamine to yield ajmalicine. Tetrahydroalstonine synthase was present in cell suspension cultures of C. ovalis, C. roseus, Picralima nitida, Rhazya stricta, and Vinca herbacea.

Keywords

Molecular Weight Cell Suspension NADPH Alkaloid Suspension Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bradford M (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72: 248–254.Google Scholar
  2. Deus-Neumann B, Zenk MH (1984) Planta Medica 5: 427–431.Google Scholar
  3. Felix H, Brodelius P, Mosbach K (1981) Anal. Biochem. 116: 462–470.Google Scholar
  4. Fromm HJ (1975): in: Molecular Biology Biochemistry and Biophysics. Kleinzeller A, Springer GF and Wittmann HG eds., Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Vol. 22, 1–92.Google Scholar
  5. Heinstein P, Stöckigt J, Zenk MH (1980) Tetrahedron Letters 21: 141–144.Google Scholar
  6. Hemscheidt T, Zenk MH (1980) FEBS Lett. 110: 187–191.Google Scholar
  7. Hesse M (1964) Indolalkaloide in Tabellen, Springer Verlag Berlin, Göttingen, Heidelberg, p. 58.Google Scholar
  8. Hesse M (1968) Indolalkaloide in Tabellen, Springer Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, p. 102.Google Scholar
  9. Linsmaier EM and Skoog F (1965) Physiol. Plant 18: 100–127.Google Scholar
  10. Segal HL, Kachmar JF, Bogner PD (1952) Enzymologia 15: 187–198.Google Scholar
  11. Stöckigt J, Treimer JF, Zenk MH (1976) FEBS Lett. 70: 267–270.Google Scholar
  12. Stöckigt J, Husson HP, Kan-Fan C, Zenk MH (1977) J.C.S. Chem. Comm. 164–166.Google Scholar
  13. Stöckigt J, Hemscheidt T, Höfle G, Heinstein P, Formacek V (1983) Biochemistry 22: 3448–3452.Google Scholar
  14. Treimer JF, Zenk MH (1979) Europ. J. Biochem. 101: 225–233.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Hemscheidt
    • 1
  • M. H. Zenk
    • 1
  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für Pharmazeutische BiologieUniversität MünchenMünchen 2FRG

Personalised recommendations