This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
R. T. Brady, “Depth Relevance of Some Paraconsistent Logics”,Studia Logica 43 (1984), pp. 63–73.
R. T. Brady, “A Routley-Meyer Affixing Style Semantics for Logics Containing Aristotle's Thesis”,Studia Logica 48 (1989), pp. 235–241.
R. T. Brady, “The Non-Triviality of Dialectical Set Theory”, inParaconsistent Logic (ed. by G. Priest, R. Routley and J. Norman), Philosophia Verlag, Munich, 1989, pp. 437–471.
R. T. Brady, “Gentzenization and Decidability of Some Contraction-less Relevant Logics”,Journal of Philosophical Logic 20 (1991). pp. 97–117.
R. T. Brady, “Universal Logic”, in preparation.
R. Routley, “Ultralogic as Universal?”,Relevance Logic Newsletter, Vol. 2 (1977), pp. 50–89 and 138–175, and also in “Exploring Meinong's Jungle and Beyond”, A.N.U., 1980.
R. Routley and R. K. Meyer, “The Semantics of Entailment I”, inTruth, Syntax and Modality, ed. by H. Leblanc, North Holland, 1972, pp. 199–243.
R. Routley, R. K. Meyer, V. Plumwood and R. T. Brady,Relevant Logics and Their Rivals, Vol. 1, Ridgeview, 1982.
J. K. Slaney, “Reduced Models for Relevant Logics Without WI”,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 28 (1987), pp. 395–407.
J. K. Slaney, “General Logic”,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (1990), pp. 74–88.
This paper was presented to the 1990 meeting of the Australasian Association for Logic held at the University of Sydney, and I thank those present for helpful comments made.
About this article
Cite this article
Brady, R.T. Hierarchical semantics for relevant logics. J Philos Logic 21, 357–374 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00260741
- Relevant Logic