Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Hierarchical semantics for relevant logics

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. [1]

    R. T. Brady, “Depth Relevance of Some Paraconsistent Logics”,Studia Logica 43 (1984), pp. 63–73.

  2. [2]

    R. T. Brady, “A Routley-Meyer Affixing Style Semantics for Logics Containing Aristotle's Thesis”,Studia Logica 48 (1989), pp. 235–241.

  3. [3]

    R. T. Brady, “The Non-Triviality of Dialectical Set Theory”, inParaconsistent Logic (ed. by G. Priest, R. Routley and J. Norman), Philosophia Verlag, Munich, 1989, pp. 437–471.

  4. [4]

    R. T. Brady, “Gentzenization and Decidability of Some Contraction-less Relevant Logics”,Journal of Philosophical Logic 20 (1991). pp. 97–117.

  5. [5]

    R. T. Brady, “Universal Logic”, in preparation.

  6. [6]

    R. Routley, “Ultralogic as Universal?”,Relevance Logic Newsletter, Vol. 2 (1977), pp. 50–89 and 138–175, and also in “Exploring Meinong's Jungle and Beyond”, A.N.U., 1980.

  7. [7]

    R. Routley and R. K. Meyer, “The Semantics of Entailment I”, inTruth, Syntax and Modality, ed. by H. Leblanc, North Holland, 1972, pp. 199–243.

  8. [8]

    R. Routley, R. K. Meyer, V. Plumwood and R. T. Brady,Relevant Logics and Their Rivals, Vol. 1, Ridgeview, 1982.

  9. [9]

    J. K. Slaney, “Reduced Models for Relevant Logics Without WI”,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 28 (1987), pp. 395–407.

  10. [10]

    J. K. Slaney, “General Logic”,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (1990), pp. 74–88.

Download references

Author information

Additional information

This paper was presented to the 1990 meeting of the Australasian Association for Logic held at the University of Sydney, and I thank those present for helpful comments made.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brady, R.T. Hierarchical semantics for relevant logics. J Philos Logic 21, 357–374 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00260741

Download citation

Keywords

  • Relevant Logic