This study compares the results of a new computer assisted evaluation programm of sonographic images of the prostate with the histological examination of the operative specimen. This computer program is based on the fact that the human eye is not capable of distinguishing picture distribution points which differ in higher than second order statistics. The sensitivity of the method was 89%, the specificity 86% and the diagnostic accuracy 88%. The results are discussed by comparing them to results of transrectal sonography and digital palpation as reported in the literature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Barnes WR, Ninan CA (1972) Carcinoma of the prostate: biopsy and conservative therapy. J Urol 108:897–900
Breackman J, Denis L (1983) The practice and pitfalls of ultrasonography of the lower urinary tract. Eur Urol 9:193–201
Brooman PJC, Peeling WB, Griffiths GJ, Roberts E, Evans K (1981) A comparison between digital examination and the perrectal ultrasound in the evaluation of the prostate. Br J Urol 53:617–620
Gammelgaard J, Holm HH (1980) Transurethral and transrectal ultrasonic scanning in urology. J Urol 124:863–868
Greenberg M, Neimen HL, Vogelzang R, Falkowski W (1982) Ultrasonographic features of prostatic carcinoma. J Clin Ultrasound 10:307–312
Harada K, Tanahashi Y, Igari D, Numata I, Orikasa S (1980) Clinical evaluation of inside echo patients in gray scale prostatic echography. J Urol 124:216–220
Kadow JC, Gingell JC, Penry JB (1985) Prostatic ultrasonography: a useful technique? Br J Urol 57:440–443
Peeling WB, Griffiths GJ (1984) Imaging of the prostate by ultrasound. J Urol 132:217–224
Resnick MI, Willard WJ, Boyce HW (1978) Ultrasonic evaluation of the prostatic nodule. J Urol 120:86–89
Schuster E, Knoflach P, Huber K, Grabner G (1986) An interactive processing system for ultrasonic compound imaging, real-time processing and texture analysis. Ultrason Imaging 8: 131–150
Watnabe H, Igari D, Tanehishi Y, Harada K, Saitoh M (1974) Development and application of new equipment for transrectal ultrasonography. J Clin Ultrasound 2:91–98
Wawerda C (1984) Untersuchung von Gewebe mittels Textur-Algorithmen. Masters Thesis, Technical University Vienna
About this article
Cite this article
Kratzik, C., Schuster, E., Hainz, A. et al. Texture analysis — A new method of differentiating prostatic carcinoma from prostatic hypertrophy. Urol. Res. 16, 395–397 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00256050
- Texture analysis
- Prostatic Hypertrophy
- Prostatic Carcinoma