Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

On the philosophical basis of essentialist theories

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. [1]

    BoolosG., ‘The iterative conception of set’, The Journal of Philosophy 68, (1971) 215–231.

  2. [2]

    Dummett, M., ‘What is a theory of meaning? Part II’, in Evans, G. and McDowell, J. H. (eds.), Truth and Meaning, Oxford, 1975.

  3. [3]

    FineK., ‘Model theory for modal logic Part I’, The Journal of Philosophical Logic 7, (1978a) 125–156.

  4. [4]

    FineK., ‘Model theory for modal logic Part II’, The Journal of Philosophical Logic 7, (1978b) 277–306.

  5. [5]

    ForbesG., ‘Origin and identity’, Philosophical Studies 37, (1980a) 353–362.

  6. [6]

    Forbes, G., ‘An anti-essentialist note on substances’, to appear in Analysis (1980b).

  7. [7]

    HazenA., ‘Counterpart theoretic semantics for modal logic’, The Journal of Philosophy 76, (1979) 319–338.

  8. [8]

    KaplanD., ‘Transworld heirlines’, in LouxM. J. (ed.), The Possible and the Actual, Cornell, New York, 1979.

  9. [9]

    KripkeS., ‘Naming and necessity’, in DavidsonD. and HarmanG. (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1972.

  10. [10]

    McGinnC., ‘On the necessity of origin’, The Journal of Philosophy 73, (1976) 127–135.

  11. [11]

    MackieJ. L., ‘De what re is de re modality?’, The Journal of Philosophy 71, (1974) 551–561.

  12. [12]

    Montague, R., ‘Logical necessity, physical necessity, ethics and quantifiers’, in Thomason, R. H., Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, Yale, 1974.

  13. [13]

    Newton-SmithW. H., The Structure of Time, Routledge & Kegan Paul, New York, 1980.

  14. [14]

    Parsons, C., ‘Modal set theories’, to appear in The Journal of Symbolic Logic (1977a).

  15. [15]

    Parsons C., ‘What is the iterative conception of set?’ in ButtsR. and HintikkaJ. (eds.), Logic, Foundation of Mathematics and Computability Theory, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1977.

  16. [16]

    Peacocke, C., Holistic Explanation: Action, Space, Interpretation, Oxford, 1979.

  17. [17]

    Salmon N., ‘How not to derive essentialism from the theory of reference’, The Journal of Philosophy 76, (1979) 703–725.

  18. [18]

    Shoemaker, S., ‘Identity, properties and causality’, in French, P. A., Uehling, T. E., and Wettstein, H. K. (eds.), Studies in Metaphysics; Midwest Studies in Philosophy Volume 4. Minnesota, 1979.

  19. [19]

    Shoenfield J. R., ‘Axioms of set theory’, in BarwiseJ. (ed.), Handbook of Mathematical Logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.

  20. [20]

    Wiggins D., Sameness and Substance, Blackwell, Oxford, 1980.

Download references

Author information

Additional information

Sections of earlier versions of this paper, then titled ‘Empiricism and Essentialism’, were extensively redrafted and restructured in response to comments by Tyler Burge and Gareth Evans. The paper has also benefitted from the attentions of Martin Davies, Kit Fine, Allen Hazen and Colin McGinn. I am especially grateful to Christopher Peacocke for advice and encouragement throughout.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forbes, G. On the philosophical basis of essentialist theories. J Philos Logic 10, 73–99 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00253913

Download citation

Keywords

  • Philosophical Basis
  • Essentialist Theory