Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

On the bureaucratization of scholarship in American anthropology

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. D'Andrade, Roy et al (1975). “Academic Opportunity in Anthropology 1974–90,” American Anthropologist 77: 753–773.

  2. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  3. Mead, Margaret (1974). Ruth Benedict. New York: Wm Morrow & Co.

  4. Mills, C. Wright (1959). The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford.

  5. Murphy, Robert F. (1972). Robert Lowie. New York: Columbia University Press.

  6. Parsons, Talcott, Bales, R.F., and Shils, E.A. (1953). Working Papers in the Theory of Action. Glencoe: The Free Press

  7. Powdermaker, Hortense (1966). Stranger and Friend. New York: Norton.

  8. Steward, Julian (1973). Alfred Kroeber. New York: Columbia University Press.

  9. Weber, Max (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Oxford University Press.

  10. Whyte, William H.Jr. (1956). The Organization Man. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Download references

Additional information

Bette Denich was most recently Assistant Professor of Anthropology at Barnard College, Columbia University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Denich, B. On the bureaucratization of scholarship in American anthropology. Dialect Anthropol 2, 153 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00249480

Download citation

Keywords

  • Fellow Student
  • Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company
  • Interesting Ramification
  • Referee Journal Article
  • Great Fairness