Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The relationship between control, kinematic and electromyographic variables in fast single-joint movements in humans

Abstract

Two versions of the hypothesis that discrete movements are produced by shifts in the system's equilibrium point are considered. The first suggests that shifts are monotonic and end near the peak velocity of movement, and the second presumes that they are nonmonotonic (“N-shaped”) and proceed until the end of movement. The first version, in contrast to the second, predicts that movement time may be significantly reduced by opposing loads without changes in the control pattern. The purpose of the present study was to test the two hypotheses about the duration and shape of the shift in the equilibrium point based on their respective predictions concerning the effects of perturbations on kinematic and EMG patterns in fast elbow flexor movements. Subjects performed unopposed flexions of about 55–70° (control trials) and, in random test trials, movements were opposed by spring-like loads generated by a torque motor. Subjects had no visual feedback and were instructed not to correct arm deflections in case of perturbations. After the end of the movement, the load was removed leading to a secondary movement to the same final position as that in control trials (equifinality). When the load was varied, the static arm positions before unloading and associated joint torques (ranging from 0 to 80–90% of maximum voluntary contraction) had a monotonic relationship. Test movements opposed by a high load (80–90% of maximal voluntary contraction) ended near the peak velocity of control movements. Phasic and tonic electromyographic patterns were load-dependent. In movements opposed by high loads, the first agonist burst was significantly prolonged and displayed a high level of tonic activity for as long as the load was maintained. In the same load conditions, the antagonist burst was suppressed during the dynamic and static phases of movement. The findings of suppression of the antagonist burst does not support the hypothesis of an Nshaped control signal. Equally, the substantial reduction in movement time by the introduction of an opposing load cannot be reconciled in this model. Instead, our data indicate that the shifts in the equilibrium point underlying fast flexor movements are of short duration, ending near the peak velocity of unopposed movement. This suggests that kinematic and electromyographic patterns represent a long-lasting oscillatory response of the system to the short-duration monotonic control pattern, external forces and proprioceptive feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abdusamatov RM, Adamovich SV, Berkinblit MB, Chernavsky AV, Feldman AG (1988) Rapid one-joint movements: a qualitative model and its experimental verification. In: Gurfinkel VS, Ioffe ME, Massion J, Roll JP (eds) Stance and motion: facts and concepts. Plenum, New York, pp 161–170

  2. Adamovich SV, Burlachkova NI, Feldman AG (1984) Wave nature of the central process of formation of the trajectories of change in the joint angle in man. Biophysics 29: 130–134

  3. Adamovich SV (1992) How does the nervous system control the equilibrium trajectory? Behav Brain Sci 15:704–705

  4. Asatryan DG, Feldman AG (1965) Functional tuning of the nervous system with control of movement or maintenance of a steady posture. I. Mechanographic analysis of the work of the limb on execution of a postural task. Biophysics 10:925–935

  5. Bennett DJ (1993) Electromyographic responses to constant position errors imposed during voluntary elbow joint movement in human. Exp Brain Res 95:499–508

  6. Bizzi E, Hogan N, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Giszter S (1992) Does the nervous system use equilibrium-point control to guide single and multiple joint movements? Behav Brain Sci 15:603–613

  7. Brown SH, Cooke JD (1986) Initial agonist burst is modified by perturbations preceding movement. Brain Res 377:311–322

  8. Bullock D, Grossberg S (1988) Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation. Psychol Rev 95:49–90

  9. Davis WR, Kelso JAS (1982) Analysis of “invariant characteristics” in the motor control of Down's syndrome and normal subjects. J Mot Behav 14:194–212

  10. DeLuca CJ, Mambrito B (1987) Voluntary control of motor units in human antagonist muscles: coactivation and reciprocal activation. J Neurophysiol 58:525–542

  11. Drew T, Rossignol S (1987) A kinematic and electromyographic study of cutaneous reflexes evoked from the forelimb of unrestrained walking cats. J Neurophysiol 57:1160–1184

  12. Feldman AG (1979) Central and reflex mechanisms in the control of movement, (in Russian) Nauka, Moscow

  13. Feldman AG (1980) Superposition of motor programs. II. Rapid forearm flexion in man. Neuroscience 5:91–95

  14. Feldman AG (1986) Once more on the equilibrium-point (λ model) for motor control. J Mot Behav 18:17–54

  15. Feldman AG, Adamovich SV, Ostry DJ, Flanagan JR (1990) The origin of electromyograms — explanations based on the equilibrium point hypothesis. In: Winters JM, Woo SL-Y (eds) Multiple muscle systems: biomechanics and movement organization. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, pp 195–213

  16. Feldman AG, Levin ML (1993) Control variables and related concepts in motor control. Concepts Neurosci 4:25–51

  17. Forget R, Lamarre Y (1987) Rapid elbow flexion in the absence of proprioceptive and cutaneous feedback. Hum Neurobiol 6:27–37

  18. Fortier PA, Smith AM, Kalaska JF (1993) Comparison of cerebellar and motor cortex activity during reaching: directional tuning and response variability. J Neurophysiol 69:1136–1149

  19. Georgopoulos AP, Kalaska JF, Crutcher MD, Caminiti R, Massey JT (1990) The representation of movement direction in the motor cortex: single cell and population studies. In: Edelman GM, Gall WE, Cowan WM (eds) Signal and sense. Local and global order in perceptual maps. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 501–524

  20. Gerilovsky L, Struppler A, Velho F, Niehage O (1990) Discharge pattern of tonically activated motor units during unloading. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 30:459–467

  21. Gielen CCAM, Houk JC, Marcus SL, Miller LE (1984) Viscoelastic properties of the wrist motor servo in man. Ann Biomed Eng 12:599–620

  22. Gottlieb GL (1994) The generation of the efferent command and the importance of joint compliance in fast elbow movements. Exp Brain Res 97:545–550

  23. Gottlieb GL, Agarwal GC (1988) Compliance of single joints: elastic and plastic characteristics. J Neurophysiol 59:937–951

  24. Gutman AM (1991) Bistability of dendrites. Int J Neurol Syst 1:291–304

  25. Hainaut K, Duchateau J, Desmedt JE (1981) Differential effects on slow and fast motor units of different programs of brief daily muscle training in man. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Motor unit types, recruitment and plasticity in health and disease. Karger, Basel, pp 241–249

  26. Hasan Z (1986) Optimized movement trajectories and joint stiffness in unperturbed, inertially loaded movements. Biol Cybern 53:373–382

  27. Hogan N (1984) An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements. J Neurosci 4:2745–2754

  28. Houk JC (1979) Regulation of stiffness by skeletomotor reflexes. Annu Rev Physiol 41: 99–114

  29. Hounsgaard J, Hultborn H, Jespersen B, Kiehn O (1988) Bistability of α-motoneurones in the decerebrate cat and in the acute spinal cat after intravenous 5-hydroxytryptophan. J Physiol (Lond) 405:345–367

  30. Hugon M, Massion J, Wiesendanger M (1982) Anticipatory postural changes induced by active unloading and comparison with passive unloading in man. Pflugers Archiv 393:292–296

  31. Humphrey DR, Reed DJ (1983) Separate cortical systems for control of joint movement and joint stiffness: reciprocal activation and coactivation of antagonist muscles. Adv Neurol 39:347–372

  32. Lacquaniti F (1992) Automatic control of limb movement and posture. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2: 807–814

  33. Lan N, Crago PE (1992) Equilibrium-point hypothesis, minimum effort control strategy and the triphasic muscle activation pattern. Behav Brain Sci 15:769–771

  34. Latash ML (1993) Control of human movement. Human Kinetics, Champaign

  35. Latash ML (1994) Control of fast elbow movement: a study of electromyographic patterns during movements against unexpectedly decreased inertial load. Exp Brain Res 98:145–152

  36. Latash ML, Gottlieb GL (1991a) Reconstruction of shifting elbow joint compliant characteristics during fast and slow movements. Neuroscience 43:697–712

  37. Latash ML, Gottlieb GL (1991b) An equilibrium-point model of dynamic regulation for fast single-joint movements. II. Similarity of isometric and isotonic programs. J Mot Behav 23: 179–191

  38. Lestienne F (1979) Effects of inertial loads and velocity on the braking process of voluntary limb movements. Exp Brain Res 35:407–418

  39. Levin MF, Feldman AG, Milner TE, Lamarre Y (1992) Reciprocal and coactivation commands for fast wrist movements. Exp Brain Res 89:669–677

  40. Loeb GE, Levine WS (1990) Linking musculoskeletal mechanics to sensorimotor neurophysiology. In: Winters JM, Woo SL-Y (eds) Multiple muscle systems: biomechanics and movement organization. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, pp 165–181

  41. St-Onge N, Qi H, Feldman AG (1993) The patterns of control signals underlying elbow joint movements in humans. Neurosci Lett 164:171–174

  42. Wachholder K (1928) Willkurliche Haltung und Bewegung. Ergeb Physiol 26:568–775

  43. Wadman WJ, Denier van der Gon JJ, Geuze RH, Mol CR (1979) Control of fast goal-directed arm movements. J Hum Mov Stud 5:3–17

  44. Windhorst U (1994) Shaping static elbow torque-angle relationships by spinal cord circuits: a theoretical study. Neuroscience 59:713–72

  45. Zajac FE, Gordon ME (1989) Determining muscle's force and action in multi-articular movement. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 17:187–230

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feldman, A.G., Adamovich, S.V. & Levin, M.F. The relationship between control, kinematic and electromyographic variables in fast single-joint movements in humans. Exp Brain Res 103, 440–450 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00241503

Download citation

Key words

  • Control variables
  • Single-joint movement
  • Electromyographic patterns
  • Stretch reflex
  • Equilibrium-point hypothesis