Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates


An electron microscopic study of chick hyperstriatum ventrale

  • 89 Accesses

  • 120 Citations


Fourteen chicks were hatched and reared in darkness to ≅ 21 h when they were exposed to overhead illumination for 0.5 h and then to an imprinting stimulus (a pulsing red light) for 20 min. The chicks were then matched in pairs on the basis of their activity. One member of each pair was returned to the dark and the other was trained for a further 120 min. All chicks were killed ≅ 6.5 h after the onset of training and perfused with fixative. Blocks were removed bilaterally from a restricted part of the hyperstriatum ventrale and prepared for electronmicroscopy. Various synaptic features were measured, all counts being performed ‘blind’.

In undertrained chicks the length of the synaptic apposition zone in this part of the left hemisphere was shorter than that in the right by a mean value of 35±11.4 (SEM) nm. Further training eliminated this difference. No other synaptic measurements were affected by prolonging the period of training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Altman J (1971) Coated vesicles and synaptogenesis. A developmental study in the cerebellar cortex of the rat. Brain Res 30: 311–322

  2. Bateson P (1979a) How do sensitive periods arise and what are they for? Anim Behav 27: 470–486

  3. Bateson P (1979b) Brief exposure to a novel stimulus during imprinting in chicks and its influence on subsequent preferences. Animal Learn Behav 7: 259–262

  4. Bateson PPG (1966) The characteristics and context of imprinting. Biol Rev 41: 177–220

  5. Bateson PPG, Jaeckel JB (1974) Chicks' preferences for familiar and novel conspicuous objects after different periods of exposure. Anim Behav 24: 386–390

  6. Bateson PPG, Wainwright AAP (1972) The effects of prior exposure to light on the imprinting process in domestic chicks. Behaviour 42: 279–290

  7. Bateson PPG, Horn G, McCabe BJ (1978a) Imprinting and the incorporation of uracil in the chick brain. An autoradiographic study. J Physiol (Lond) 275: 70P

  8. Bateson PPG, Horn G, McCabe BJ (1978b) Imprinting. The effect of partial ablation of the medial hyperstriatum ventrale of the chick. J Physiol (Lond) 285: 23P

  9. Bateson PPG, Horn G, Rose SPR (1975) Imprinting. Correlations between behaviour and incorporation of [14C] uracil into chick brain. Brain Res 84: 207–220

  10. Bateson PPG, Horn G, Rose SPR (1972) Effects of early experience on regional incorporation of precursors into RNA and protein in the chick brain. Brain Res 39: 449–465

  11. Bateson PPG, Rose SPR, Horn G (1973) Imprinting. Lasting effects on uracil incorporation into chick brain. Science 181: 576–578

  12. Cajal SR (1955) Histologie du système nerveux, vol. II. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Madrid, pp 887–890

  13. DeFeudis FV, DeFeudis PAF (1977) Elements of the behavioural code. Academic Press, London, pp 386

  14. Gray EG (1959) Axo-somatic and axo-dendritic synapses of the cerebral cortex: an electron microscope study. J Anat 93: 420–423

  15. Hebb DO (1949) The organisation of behaviour. Wiley, New York

  16. Horn G, McCabe BJ, Bateson PPG (1979) An autoradiographic study of the chick brain after imprinting. Brain Res 168: 361–373

  17. Horn G, Rose SPR, Bateson PPG (1973a) Experience and plasticity in the central nervous system. Science 181: 506–514

  18. Horn G, Rose SPR, Bateson PPG (1973b) Monocular imprinting and regional incorporation of tritiated uracil into the brains of intact and ‘split-brain’ chicks. Brain Res 56: 227–237

  19. Kohsaka S, Takamatsu K, Aoki E, Tsukada Y (1979) Metabolic mapping of chick brain after printing using [14C]2-deoxyglucose technique. Brain Res 172: 539–544

  20. Mayhew TM (1979) Basic stereological relationships for quantitative microscopical anatomy — a simple systematic approach. J Anat 129: 95–105

  21. McCabe BJ, Cipolla-Neto J, Horn G, Bateson P (1979a) Brain lesions and imprinting. Neurosci Lett [Suppl] 3: S381

  22. McCabe BJ, Horn G, Bateson PPG (1979b) Effects of rhythmic hyperstriatal stimulation on chicks' preferences for visual flicker. Physiol Behav 23: 137–140

  23. Nottebohm F (1977) Asymmetries in neural control of vocalisation in the canary. In: Harnard S, Doty RW, Goldstein L, Taynes T, Krautmer G (eds) Lateralisation in the nervous system. Academic Press, New York, pp 23–44

  24. Rogers LJ, Anson JN (1979) Lateralisation of function in the chicken fore-brain. Pharmol Biochem Behav 10: 679–686

  25. Sluckin W (1972) Imprinting and early learning. Methuen, London

  26. Weibel ER, Bolender RP (1973) Stereological techniques for electron microscopic morphometry. In: Hayat MA (ed) Principles and techniques of electron microscopy, Biological applications, vol 3. Von Reinhold, London, pp 237–296

  27. Williams MA (1977) Quantitative methods in biology. In: Glauert AM (ed) Practical methods in electron microscopy, vol 6. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 36–38

  28. Van Dobben de Bruyn CS (1968) Cumulative sum tests — theory and practice. Griffin, London (Griffin Statistical Monographs 24)

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Professor G. Horn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bradley, P., Horn, G. & Bateson, P. Imprinting. Exp Brain Res 41, 115–120 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236600

Download citation

Key words

  • Imprinting
  • Synapse
  • Hemispheric asymmetry
  • Domestic chicks