Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Electrophysiology and anatomy of direction-specific pretectal units in Salamandra salamandra

  • 48 Accesses

  • 14 Citations

Summary

Pretectal cells of the European fire salamander were recorded extracellularly during binocular and monocular horizontal optokinetic stimulations. The locations of the individual units within the pretectal nucleus were verified with Alcian blue injections. The particular anatomical properties of single cells were demonstrated after single-unit recordings by means of horseradish peroxidase preparations.

Direction selective pretectal cells were found to be predominantly (2/3) sensitive to temporo-nasal movements in the visual field of the contralateral eye. They usually possessed large receptive fields centered on the visual equator with restricted diameters in the dorso-ventral axis. Their resting discharge was low, and in some cells no spontaneous discharges were observed. The cells preferred low stimulus velocities, most of them being optimally stimulated with velocities of 1 to 10 deg/s. A group of units was exclusively sensitive to accelerated movements. A subclass of them was transiently responsive when the stimulus stopped.

In the anterior and most dorsal part of the pretectal nucleus, binocularly influenced units were found. These cells responded best with binocular optokinetic stimulations and less vigorously or with less pronounced direction selectivity if only the contralateral eye was stimulated. With ipsilateral stimulations alone no response could be elicited. This response type could be explained by inhibitory inputs from the ipsilateral eye via direct ipsilateral projections or crossing pretectal fibers. The responses of these cells are well correlated to behavioral results showing that OKN performance in salamanders, as in some other vertebrates, is different with binocular as compared to monocular stimulations.

The direction-sensitive pretectal cells usually possess extensive dendritic arborizations within the ipsilateral pretectal neuropil. Most of the cell bodies were scattered in the white substance or in the superficial layers of the periventricular gray. In the cases where the efferent fiber of a particular cell could be clearly recognized, the axon projected to the basal optic neuropil of the accessory optic system, the contralateral pretectum or, in two cases, to the medulla oblongata into a region which might be homologous to the inferior olive of higher vertebrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ansorge K, Grüsser-Cornehls U (1980) Neurons in the spinal cord of the frog responding to moving visual stimuli. Neurosci Lett 18: 53–58

  2. Ballas I, Hoffmann KP, Wagner H-J (1981) Retinal projection to the nucleus of the optic tract in the cat as revealed by retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase. Neurosci Lett 26: 197–202

  3. Birukow G (1937) Untersuchungen über den optischen Drehnystagmus und die Sehschärfe des Grasfrosches (Rana temporaria). Z Vergl Physiol 25: 92–142

  4. Blanks RHJ, Giolli RA, Pham SV (1982) Projections of the medial terminal nucleus of the accessory optic system upon pretectal nuclei in the pigmented rat. Exp Brain Res 48: 228–237

  5. Castiglioni AJ, Gallaway MC, Coulter JD (1978) Spinal projections from the midbrain in the monkey. J Comp Neurol 178: 329–346

  6. Cochran SL, Precht W, Dieringer N (1981a) Neuronal mediation of optokinetic reflexes in the frog. Experientia 37: 6

  7. Cochran SL, Precht W, Dieringer N (1981b) Responses of sensory relay neurons and extraocular motoneurons to optokinetic stimulation in the frog. Neurosci Abstr 7: 23

  8. Collewijn H (1975) Direction-selective units in the rabbit's nucleus of the optic tract. Brain Res 100: 489–508

  9. Collewijn H (1980) Sensory control of optokinetic nystagmus in the rabbit. Trends Neurosci 11: 277–280

  10. Conley M, Fite KV (1980) Optokinetic nystagmus in the domestic pigeon: Effects of foveal lesions. Brain Behav Evol 17: 89–102

  11. Dieringer N, Precht W (1982) Compensatory head and eye movements in the frog and their contribution to stabilization of gaze. Exp Brain Res 47: 394–406

  12. Fite KV, Montgomery N, Wojcicki C, Bengston L (1980) Visuomotor correlates of the anuran accessory optic system. Neurosci Abstr 6: 839

  13. Fritzsch B (1980) Retinal projections in European Salamandridae. Cell Tissue Res 213: 325–341

  14. Frost BJ, Ramm P, Morgan B (1980) Selective activation of pigeon nBOR with vertical whole-field movements as revealed by 14C-2DG autoradiography. Neurosci Abstr 6: 717

  15. Gioanni H, Rey J, Villalobos J (1980) Etude du nystagmus optocinétique chez le pigeon: Rôle du système optique accessoire. CR Acad Sc Paris 291: 909–912

  16. Gioanni H, Rey J, Villalobos J, Bouyer JJ, Gioanni Y (1981) Optokinetic nystagmus in the pigeon (Columba livia): Study in monocular and binocular vision. Exp Brain Res 44: 362–370

  17. Grasse KL, Cynader MS (1982) Electrophysiology of medial terminal nucleus of accessory optic system in the cat. J Neurophysiol 48: 490–504

  18. Grüsser-Cornehls U, Himstedt W (1976) The urodele visual system. In: Fite KV (ed) The amphibian visual system. Academic Press, New York San Francisco London, pp 203–266

  19. Harnischfeger G (1979) An improved method for extracellular marking of electrode tip positions in nervous tissue. J Neurosci Meth 1: 195–200

  20. Harris LR, Leporé F, Guillemont J-P, Cynader M (1980) Abolition of optokinetic nystagmus in the cat. Science 210: 91–92

  21. Herrick CJ (1948) The brain of the tiger salamander Ambystoma tigrinum. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  22. Hertzler DR, Hayes WN (1968) Effects of monocular vision and midbrain transection on movement detection in the turtle. J Comp Physiol Psychol 67: 473–478

  23. Hoffmann KP (1981) Naso-temporal versus temporo-nasal OKN in the cat. Neurosci Abstr 7: 23

  24. Hoffmann KP, Behrend L, Schoppmann A (1977) Visual responses of neurons in the nucleus of the optic tract of visually deprived cats. Neurosci Abstr 3: 563

  25. Hoffmann KP, Schoppmann A (1981) A quantitative analysis of the direction-specific response of neurons in the cat's nucleus of the optic tract. Exp Brain Res 42: 146–157

  26. Katte O, Hoffmann KP (1980) Direction specific neurons in the pretectum of the frog (Rana esculenta). J Comp Physiol 140: 53–57

  27. Lázár G (1973) Role of the accessory optic system in the optokinetic nystagmus of the frog. Brain Behav Evol 5: 443–460

  28. Manteuffel G (1979) Übergang vom optomotorischen Verhalten zur Fixation beim Kammolch (Triturus cristatus). Zool Jb Physiol 83: 526–539

  29. Manteuffel G (1982) The accessory optic system in the newt, Triturus cristatus: Unitary response properties from the basal optic neuropil. Brain Behav Evol 21: 175–184

  30. Manteuffel G, Wess O, Himstedt W (1977) Messungen am dioptrischen Apparat von Amphibienaugen und Berechnung der Sehschärfe in Wasser und Luft. Zool Jb Physiol 81: 395–406

  31. Manteuffel G, Petersen J, Himstedt W (1983a) Optic nystagmus and nystagmogen centers in the European fire salamander (Salamandra salamandra). Zool Jb Physiol 87: 113–125

  32. Manteuffel G, Meyer-Naujoks C, Himstedt W (1983b) Extracellular single-cell recording and HRP staining. Naturwissenschaften 70: 152–153

  33. Nyberg-Hansen R (1964) The location and termination of tectospinal fibers in the cat. Exp Neurol 9: 212–227

  34. Rey J, Gioanni H, Villalobos J (1982) Analyse unitaire du nucleus ectomammilaris (nEM) chez le pigeon durant le nystagmus optocinétique. CR Acad Sc Paris 295: 41–44

  35. Rhoades W, DellaCroce DR (1980) Cells of origin of the tectospinal tract in the golden hamster: An anatomical and electrophysiological investigation. Exp Neurol 67: 163–180

  36. Scalia F (1972) The terminations of retinal axons in the pretectal region of mammals. J Comp Neurol 145: 223–258

  37. Scalia F, Gregory K (1970) Retinofugal projections in the frog: Location of the postsynaptic neurons. Brain Behav Evol 3: 16–29

  38. Székely G (1971) The mesencephalic and diencephalic optic centres in the frog. Vis Res Suppl 3: 269–279

  39. Tauber ES, Atkin A (1968) Optomotor response to monocular stimulation: Relation to visual system organization. Science 160: 1365–1367

  40. Terasawa K, Otani K, Yamada J (1979) Descending pathways of the nucleus of the optic tract in the rat. Brain Res 173: 405–417

  41. Uchida K, Mizuno N, Sugimoto T, Itoh K (1982) Autoradiographic demonstration of retinal projections to the brain stem structures in the rabbit using transneuronal tracing technique with special reference to the retinal projections to the inferior olive. Exp Neurol 78: 369–379

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manteuffel, G. Electrophysiology and anatomy of direction-specific pretectal units in Salamandra salamandra . Exp Brain Res 54, 415–425 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00235466

Download citation

Key words

  • Pretectal nucleus
  • Direction selectivity
  • Binocularity
  • Single cell anatomy
  • Salamander