Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Principled atheism in the Buddhist scholastic tradition

Conclusion

The doctrine that there is no permanent creator who superintends creation and takes care of his creatures accords quite well with each of the principles known as the four noble truths of Buddhism. The first truth, that distress is universal, is traditionally expounded in terms of the impermanence of all features of experience and in terms of the absence of genuine unity or personal identity in the multitude of physical and mental factors that constitute what we experience as a single person. As we saw above, the principal Buddhist arguments against the existence of God focus on the impossibility of permanence and unity in the causal structure of the universe. The second noble truth, that distress is the outcome of one's own unrealistic aspirations, is traditionally seen as ruling out the erroneous view that distress is something inflicted upon creatures by a cosmic superintendent or by other circumstances completely beyond their control. The third noble truth, that distress can be eliminated by divesting oneself of all unrealistic aspirations, rules out the view that sentient beings, as powerless victims of a divine will, have no alternative to a life of constant frustration. And the fourth noble truth, that the best means of removing unrealistic desires is to follow a methodical course of self-discipline, counters the view that the road to happiness lies in obedience to divine will or in trying to manipulate the sentiments of a cosmic intelligence through prayer or ritual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Buddhaghosa. Visuddhimagga. Edited with Dhammapāla's Paramatthamañjūsā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}\)īkā by Dr. Rewatadhamma eds. Vol. 2. Pāli Granthamālā, 3. Vārā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\)asī: Vārā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\)aseya-sa\(\dot m\)sk\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r}\)taviśvavidyālaya, 1969.

  2. Chalmers, Robert eds (1898). Editor. The Majjhima-Nikāya. Vol. 2. London: Pali Text Society, 1951 (reprint).

  3. Davids, T. W. Rhys and J. Estlin Carpenter eds (1890). Editors. The Dīgha Nikāya. Vol. 1. London: Pali Text Society, 1967 (reprint).

  4. Dharmakīrti. Pramā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\)avārttikam. Edited with Manorathanandin's V\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r}\)tti by Svāmī Dvārikādāsa Śāstrī. Bauddha Bharati, 3. Vārā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\)asī: Bauddhabhāratī, 1968.

  5. Di\(\dot m\)nāga. The Pramā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\)asamuccayav\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r}\)tti of Dignāga. Chapter Five: Anyāpoha-parīk\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}\)ā. Tibetan text edited with Jinendrabuddhi's commentary by Masaaki Hattori. Memoirs of the Faculty of Letters, 21. Kyōto: Kyoto University, 1982.

  6. Hayes, Richard P. (1984). “The question of doctrinalism in the Buddhist epistemologists.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 52: 645–670.

  7. Jayanta Bha\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}\) \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}\)a. The Nyāyamañjarī. Edited by Ga\(\dot m\)gādhara Śāstrī Taila\(\dot m\)ga. Vizianagram Sanskrit Series, 10. Benares: E. J. Lazarus & Co., 1895.

  8. Sāntarak\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}\)ita. Tattvasa\(\dot m\)graha\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{h}\). Edited with Kamalaśīla's Pañjikā eds by Svāmī Dvārikādāsa Śāstrī. Vol. 1. Bauddha Bharati, 1. Vārā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\)asī: Bauddhabhāratī, 1968.

  9. Śāstrī, Svāmī Dvārikādāsa eds (1979). Editor. Milindapañhapāli. Bauddha Bharati, 13. Vārā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\)asī: Bauddhabhāratī.

  10. Uddyotakara. Nyāyavārttika. Edited by V. P. Dvivedin and L. S. Dravid eds. Kashi Sanskrit Series, 33. Vārā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\)asī: Kashi Sanskrit Series, 1916.

  11. Vaidya, P. L. eds (1963). Editor. Saddharmala\(\dot m\)kāvatārasūtram. Buddhist Sanskrit Texts, 3. Darbhanga: Mithilāvidyāpī\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}\)ha.

  12. Vasubandhu. Abhidharmakośabhā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}\)yam. Edited by P. Pradhan eds, 1967. Revised second edition by Aruna Haldar. Tibetan Sanskrit Works Series, 8. Patna: K. P. Jayaswal Research Institute, 1975 (2nd ed.).

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayes, R.P. Principled atheism in the Buddhist scholastic tradition. J Indian Philos 16, 5–28 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00235404

Download citation

Keywords

  • Personal Identity
  • Causal Structure
  • Single Person
  • Mental Factor
  • Noble Truth