Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 101, Issue 2, pp 331–345 | Cite as

A three-dimensional analysis of vergence movements at various levels of elevation

  • A. W. H. Minken
  • J. A. M. Van Gisbergen
Original Paper

Abstract

Earlier studies have shown that eye positions, recorded in subjects scanning a distant visual scene with the head in a stable position, have only two degrees of freedom (Listing's law). Due to cyclovergence, this law is modified in near-vision. Two previous quantitative studies have documented that the sign of the torsional vergence component depends systematically on elevation: when fixating a nearby target, the eyes show intorsion in up gaze, extorsion in down gaze and no cyclotorsion at some intermediate elevation level (to be denoted as the null elevation). Both studies found a linear cyclovergence/elevation relation, but disagreed on the amount of cyclotorsion. A further uncertainty is how this phenomenon develops dynamically when the binocular fixation point shifts from a far to a near position. Therefore, we have investigated the dynamic coupling between the horizontal and torsional components of vergence in human subjects who were instructed to refixate a light target after it stepped in depth. The target steps were presented at various vertical and horizontal directions relative to the straight-ahead axis of the cyclopean eye. We found that the quantitative relations among horizontal vergence, torsional vergence and elevation were intermediate between those found in the two earlier near-vision studies and that they correspond reasonably to the predictions of a model by Mok and co-workers. The cyclotorsion vergence component had about the same latency and dynamics as the horizontal component. When refixations were studied at different elevations, the torsional vergence component changed from incyclotorsion in up gaze to excyclotorsion in down gaze. In agreement with expectations derived from two quantiative models, the null elevation of cyclovergence was near the binocular primary position. Furthermore, we found no consistent additional dependence on the horizontal direction of the refixation trajectory relative to the midsaggital plane. Other experiments showed that the cyclotorsional changes accompanying convergence were not critically dependent upon the visual conditions. Quantitatively similar cyclotorsional components were found even in convergent refixations executed in full darkness towards the location of a remembered (flashed) near target. We conclude that visual feedback is unlikely to be very important in controlling cyclovergence in these various conditions.

Key words

Vergence Listing's law 3D motor control Binocular Human 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bains RA, Crawford JD, Cadera W, Vilis T (1992) The conjugacy of human saccadic eye movements. Vision Res 32:1677–1684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Enright JT (1980) Ocular translation and cyclotorsion due to changes in fixation distance. Vision Res 20:595–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ferman L, Collewijn H, Jansen TC, Van den Berg AV (1987a) Human gaze stability in the horizontal, vertical and torsional direction during voluntary head movements, evaluated with a three-dimensional sceral induction coil technique. Vision Res 27:811–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ferman L, Collewijn H, Jansen TC, Van den Berg AV (1987b) A direct test of Listing's law. I. Human ocular torsion measured in static tertiary positions. Vision Res 27:929–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferman L, Collewijn H, Jansen TC, Van den Berg AV (1987c) A direct test of Listing's law. II. Human ocular torsion measured under dynamic conditions. Vision Res 27:939–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haslwanter Th, Straumann D, Hepp K, Hess BJM, Henn V (1991) Smooth pursuit eye movements obey Listing's law in the monkey. Exp Brain Res 87:470–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haustein W (1989) Considerations on Listing's law and the primary position by means of a matrix description of eye position control. Biol Cybern 60:411–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Helmholtz H von (1867) Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik, vol 3. Voss, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  9. Hepp K (1990) On Listing's law. Commun Math Phys 132:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hess BJM, Van Opstal AJ, Straumann D, Hepp K (1992) Calibration of three-dimensional eye position using search coil signals in the rhesus monkey. Vision Res 32:1647–1654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Howard IP, Zacher JE (1991) Human cyclovergence as a function of stimulus frequency and amplitude. Exp Brain Res 85:445–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kertesz AE, Sullivan MJ (1978) The effect of stimulus size on human cyclofusional response. Vision Res 18:567–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mays LE, Zhang Y, Thorstad MH, Gamlin PDR (1991) Trochlear unit activity during ocular convergence. J Neurophysiology 65:1484–1491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Minken AWH, Lokate JMA, Van Gisbergen JAM (1992) Application of the equal innervation principle to the analysis of binocular eye movements in three dimensions. Soc Neurosci Abstr 18:704Google Scholar
  15. Minken AWH, Van Opstal AJ, Van Gisbergen JAM (1993) Three-dimensional analysis of strongly curved saccades elicited by double-step stimuli. Exp Brain Res 93:521–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Minken AWH, Gielen CCAM, Van Gisbergen JAM (1994) An alternative 3D interpretation of Hering's equal-innervation law for version and vergence eye movements. Vision Res (In press)Google Scholar
  17. Mok D, Ro A, Cadera W, Crawford JD, Vilis T (1992) Rotation of Listing's plane during vergence. Vision Res 32:2055–2064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nakayama K (1986) Kinematics of normal and strabismic eyes. In: Schor CM, Ciuffreda KJ (eds) Vergence eye movements: basic and clinical aspects. Butterworths, London, pp 543–564Google Scholar
  19. Ono H, Nakamizo S (1978) Changing fixation in the transverse plane at eye level and Hering's law of equal innervation. Vision Res 18:511–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tweed D, Cadera W, Vilis T (1990) Computing three-dimensional eye position quaternions and eye velocity from search coil signals. Vision Res 30:97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tweed D, Fetter M, Andreadaki S, Koenig E, Dichgans J (1992) Three-dimensional properties of human pursuit eye movements. Vision Res 32:1225–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tweed D, Vilis T (1987) Implications of rotational kinematics for the oculomotor system in three dimensions. J Neurophysiol 58:832–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tweed D, Vilis T (1990) Geometric relations of eye positions and velocity vectors during saccades. Vision Res 30:111–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Gisbergen JAM, Minken AWH (1992) Limitations to the validity of Listing's law in near vision (abstract).Eur J Neuro science [Suppl] 5:276Google Scholar
  25. Van Gisbergen JAM, Minken AWH (1994) Conjugate and disconjugate contributions to bifoveal fixations studied from a 3D perspective. In: Delgao-García JM, Godeaux E, Vidal PP (eds) Information processing underlying gaze control. Pergamon, London (In press)Google Scholar
  26. Van Rijn LJ, Van den Berg AV (1993) Binocular eye orientation during fixation: Listing's law extended to include eye vergence. Vision Res 33:691–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Rijn LJ, Van der Steen J, Collewijn H (1992) Visually induced cycloversion and cyclovergence. Vision Res 32:1875–1883CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. W. H. Minken
    • 1
  • J. A. M. Van Gisbergen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medical Physics and BiophysicsUniversity of NijmegenHB NijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations