Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 101, Issue 2, pp 323–330 | Cite as

The effect of viewing the static hand prior to movement onset on pointing kinematics and variability

  • Yves Rossetti
  • George Stelmach
  • Michel Desmurget
  • Claude Prablanc
  • Marc Jeannerod
Original Paper

Abstract

Pointing accuracy and arm movement kinematics of six human subjects were measured in three conditions where the hand was never visible during the ongoing movement: (1) in the dark; (2) the static hand was seen in peripheral vision prior to target presentation, but not during the reaction time (H−T); (3) the static hand was seen in peripheral vision until movement onset (H+T). It was shown that: (1) viewing the hand prior to movement decreased pointing variability as compared to the dark condition. (2) Viewing simultaneously hand and target (H+T) further decreased pointing variability as compared to the H−T condition. This effect was proportional to the reaction time. (3) A lengthening of the deceleration phase was observed for movements performed in the H + T condition, as compared to the other two conditions. (4) A negative correlation between variability and the first part of the deceleration phase was observed in the H + T condition, but neither in the H-T condition nor in the dark. These results suggest that the decrease in pointing variability observed in the H + T condition is due to a feedback based on kinesthetic reafference. Better encoding of the initial position of the hand relative to the target (as in H + T) would allow a calibration of arm position sense, which is used to drive the hand toward the target during the deceleration phase.

Key words

Movement variability Intersensory coordination Vision Proprioception Human 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bowditch HP, Southard WF (1880) A comparison of sight and touch. J Physiol 3:232–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bossom J (1974) Movement without proprioception. Brain Res 71:285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Elliott D (1988) The influence of visual target and limb information on manual aiming. Can J Psychol 42:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elliott D, Carson RG, Goodman D, Chua R (1991) Discrete vs. continuous control of manual aiming. Hum Mov Sci 10:393–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Favilla M, Henning W, Ghez C (1989) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. VI Independant specification of responses amplitude and direction. Exp Brain Res 75:280–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fisk JD, Goodale MA (1989) The effects of instructions to subjects on the programming of visually directed reaching movements. J Mot Behav 21:5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Georgopoulos AP, Kalaska JF, Massey JT (1981) Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movements: effects of practice, uncertainty, and change in target location. J Neurophysiol 46:725–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghez C, Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Christakos CN, Cooper SE (1990) Roles of proprioceptives input in the programming of arm trajectories. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 60:837–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Graves RE, Jones BS (1990) Conscious visual perceptual awareness vs. non-conscious visual spatial localization examined with normal subjects using possible analogues of blindsight and neglect. Cognit Neuropsychol 9:487–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jeannerod M (1988) The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Jeannerod M (1991) The interaction of visual and proprioceptive cues in controlling reaching movements. In: Humphrey DR, Freund HJ (eds) Motor control: concepts and issues. Wiley & Sons, pp 277–291Google Scholar
  12. Jeannerod M, Prablanc C (1983) The visual control of reaching movements. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Motor control mechanisms in man. Raven, New York, pp 13–29Google Scholar
  13. Keele SW (1981) Behavioural analysis of movement. In: Brooks VB (ed) Motor control (Handbook of Physiology, Sect 1. The nervous system, vol II, part 2) Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore pp 1391–1414Google Scholar
  14. Knapp HD, Taub, Berman AJ (1963) Movements made in monkeys with deafferented forelimbs. Exp Neurol 7:305–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Larish DD, Volp CM, Wallace SA (1984) An empirical note on attaining a spatial target after distorting the initial conditions of movement via muscle vibration. J Mot Behav 15:15–83Google Scholar
  16. Mackenzie CL, Marteniuk RG, Dugas C, Liske D, Eckmeier B (1987) Three dimensional movement trajectories in Fitt's task: implications for control. Q J Exp Psychol [A] 39:629–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Jeannerod M, Athenes S, Ducas C (1987) Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Can J Psychol 41:365–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mather JA, Fisk JD (1985) Orienting to targets by looking and pointing: parallels and interactions in ocular and manual performance. Q J Exp Psychol [A] 37:315–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Milner TE, Ijaz MM (1990) The effect of accuracy constraints on three-dimensional movement kinematics. Neuroscience 35:365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Paillard J, Brouchon M (1968) Active and passive movements in the calibration of position sense. In: Freedman SJ (ed) The neuropsychology of spatially oriented behavior Dorsey, Homewood, Ill, pp 37–55Google Scholar
  21. Paillard J, Brouchon M (1974) A proprioceptive contribution to the spatial encoding of position cues for ballistic movements. Brain Res 71:273–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Posner MI, Nissen MJ, Ogden WC (1978) Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In : Pick A, Saltzman E (eds) Modes of perceiving and processing information. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp 137–158Google Scholar
  23. Prablanc C, Martin O (1992) Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. J Neurophysiol 67:455–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Prablanc C, Echallier JF, Jeannerod M, Komilis E (1979) Optimal response of eye and hand motor systems in pointing at a visual target. II. Static and dynamic visual cues in the control of hand movement. Biol Cybern 35:183–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Redon C, Hay L, Velay JC (1991) Proprioceptive control of goal-directed movements in man, studied by means of vibratory muscle tendon stimulation. J Mot Behav 23:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rothwell JC, Traub MM, Day BL, Obeso JA, Thomas PK, Marsden CD (1982) Manual motor performance in a deafferented man. Brain 125:515–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sanes JN, Mauritz KH, Dalakas MC, Evarts EV (1985) Motor control in humans with large-fiber sensory neuropathy. Hum Neurobiol 4:101–114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schmidt RA, Zelaznik H, Hawkins B, Frank JS, Quinn JT (1979) Motor-output variability: a theory for for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev 86:415–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schweickert (1992) Information, time, and the structure of mental events: a twenty-five-year review. In: Meyer DA, Kornblum K (eds) Attention and performance XIV. Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence and cognitive neuroscience. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp 709–744Google Scholar
  30. Smith MA, Marriott AM (1982) Vision and proprioception in simple catching. J Mot Behav 14:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Soechting JF (1984) Effect of target size on spatial and temporal characteristics of a pointing movement in man. J Neurosci 1:710–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Taub E, Berman AJ (1968) Movement and learning in the absence of sensory feedback. In: Freedman SJ (ed) The neurophysiology of spatially oriented behavior. Dorsey, Homewood, Ill., pp 173–192Google Scholar
  33. Taub E, Goldberg IA, Taub P (1975) Deafferentation in monkeys: pointing at a target without visual feedback. Exp Neurol 46:178–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van der Meulen JHP, Gooskens RHJM, Denier van der Gon JJ, Gielen CCAM, Wihelm K (1990) Mechanisms underlying accuracy in fast goal-directed arm movements in man. J Mot Behav 22 (1): 67–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wann JP, Ibrahim SF (1992) Does limb proprioception drift? Exp Brain Res 91:162–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wing AM (1992) The uncertain motor system: perspectives on the variability of movement. In: Meyer DA, Kornblum K (eds) Attention and performance XIV. Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence and cognitive neuroscience. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp 709–744Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yves Rossetti
    • 1
  • George Stelmach
    • 1
  • Michel Desmurget
    • 1
  • Claude Prablanc
    • 1
  • Marc Jeannerod
    • 1
  1. 1.Vision et Motricité, INSERM U.94BronFrance

Personalised recommendations