The effect of viewing the static hand prior to movement onset on pointing kinematics and variability
- 206 Downloads
Pointing accuracy and arm movement kinematics of six human subjects were measured in three conditions where the hand was never visible during the ongoing movement: (1) in the dark; (2) the static hand was seen in peripheral vision prior to target presentation, but not during the reaction time (H−T); (3) the static hand was seen in peripheral vision until movement onset (H+T). It was shown that: (1) viewing the hand prior to movement decreased pointing variability as compared to the dark condition. (2) Viewing simultaneously hand and target (H+T) further decreased pointing variability as compared to the H−T condition. This effect was proportional to the reaction time. (3) A lengthening of the deceleration phase was observed for movements performed in the H + T condition, as compared to the other two conditions. (4) A negative correlation between variability and the first part of the deceleration phase was observed in the H + T condition, but neither in the H-T condition nor in the dark. These results suggest that the decrease in pointing variability observed in the H + T condition is due to a feedback based on kinesthetic reafference. Better encoding of the initial position of the hand relative to the target (as in H + T) would allow a calibration of arm position sense, which is used to drive the hand toward the target during the deceleration phase.
Key wordsMovement variability Intersensory coordination Vision Proprioception Human
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Jeannerod M (1988) The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Jeannerod M (1991) The interaction of visual and proprioceptive cues in controlling reaching movements. In: Humphrey DR, Freund HJ (eds) Motor control: concepts and issues. Wiley & Sons, pp 277–291Google Scholar
- Jeannerod M, Prablanc C (1983) The visual control of reaching movements. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Motor control mechanisms in man. Raven, New York, pp 13–29Google Scholar
- Keele SW (1981) Behavioural analysis of movement. In: Brooks VB (ed) Motor control (Handbook of Physiology, Sect 1. The nervous system, vol II, part 2) Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore pp 1391–1414Google Scholar
- Larish DD, Volp CM, Wallace SA (1984) An empirical note on attaining a spatial target after distorting the initial conditions of movement via muscle vibration. J Mot Behav 15:15–83Google Scholar
- Paillard J, Brouchon M (1968) Active and passive movements in the calibration of position sense. In: Freedman SJ (ed) The neuropsychology of spatially oriented behavior Dorsey, Homewood, Ill, pp 37–55Google Scholar
- Posner MI, Nissen MJ, Ogden WC (1978) Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In : Pick A, Saltzman E (eds) Modes of perceiving and processing information. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp 137–158Google Scholar
- Schweickert (1992) Information, time, and the structure of mental events: a twenty-five-year review. In: Meyer DA, Kornblum K (eds) Attention and performance XIV. Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence and cognitive neuroscience. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp 709–744Google Scholar
- Taub E, Berman AJ (1968) Movement and learning in the absence of sensory feedback. In: Freedman SJ (ed) The neurophysiology of spatially oriented behavior. Dorsey, Homewood, Ill., pp 173–192Google Scholar
- Wing AM (1992) The uncertain motor system: perspectives on the variability of movement. In: Meyer DA, Kornblum K (eds) Attention and performance XIV. Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence and cognitive neuroscience. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp 709–744Google Scholar