Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A comparison of monaural and binaural responses to frequency modulated (FM) sweeps in cat primary auditory cortex

  • 116 Accesses

  • 31 Citations


Monaural and binaural single unit responses to frequency-modulated (FM) sweeps were compared in cat primary auditory cortex (AI). Both upward-directed (changing from low to high frequency) and downward-directed (changing from high to low frequency) FM sweeps were presented monaurally and binaurally at five rates of frequency modulation (referred to here as the speed of FM sweep). Two types of binaural FM sweep conditions were presented: (1) like-directed FM sweeps, in which identical FM sweeps were presented to both ears, and (2) opposite-directed FM sweeps, in which one ear was presented with one direction of FM sweep while the other ear was simultaneously presented with the opposite direction of FM sweep. In a sample of 78 cells, 33 cells were classified as EE (binaural facilitatory) and 45 were classified as EI (binaural inhibitory). Ninety-four percent of all units were sensitive to the direction and/or speed of FM sweeps. In general, under binaural stimulus conditions, EE cells responded optimally to like-directed FM sweeps, while EI cells preferred opposite-directed FM sweeps. When tested monaurally, 59% of all cells (both EE and EI) were direction selective, with the majority (76%) preferring downward-directed FM sweeps. When tested binaurally, most direction selective EE cells (60%) preferred upward-directed FM sweeps, while the majority of direction selective EI cells (71%) preferred downward-directed FM sweeps. Our analysis also allowed us to classify inhibitory responses of EI cells as either direction selective (37%) or non-direction selective (63%). For FM speed selectivity under monaural conditions, most EE cells preferred fast FM sweep rates (0.4–0.8 kHz/ms), while approximately equal numbers of EI cells preferred either slow (i.e., 0.05–0.1 kHz/ms) or fast (i.e., 0.4–0.8 kHz/ms) speeds. Under binaural conditions, the majority of EE and EI cells responded best to high speeds when tested with like-directed FM sweeps, while the preferred speed with opposite-directed FM sweeps was more broadly tuned. The results suggest the presence of binaural neural mechanisms underlying cortical FM sweep direction and speed selectivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Arthur RM, Pfeiffer RR, Suga N (1971) Properties of “two tone inhibition” in primary auditory neurones. J Physiol (Lond) 212:593–609

  2. Britt R, Starr A (1976) Synaptic events and discharge patterns of cochlear nucleus. II. Frequency modulated tones. J Neurophysiol 31:179–193

  3. Clopton BM, Winfield JA (1974) Unit responses in the inferior colliculus of rat to temporal auditory patterns of tone sweeps and noise bursts. Exp Neurol 42:532–540

  4. Cynader M, Chernenko G (1976) Abolition of direction selectivity in the visual cortex of the cat. Science 193:504–505

  5. Cynader M, Regan D (1978) Neurones in cat parastriate cortex sensitive to the direction of motion in three-dimensional space. J Physiol (Lond) 274:549–569

  6. Cynader M, Regan D (1982) Neurons in cat visual cortex tuned to the direction of motion in depth: effect of positional disparity. Vision Res 22:967–982

  7. Erulkar SD, Butler RA, Gerstein GL (1968) Excitation and inhibition in cochlear nucleus. II. Frequency-modulated tones. J Neurophysiol 31:637–648

  8. Gardner RB, Wilson JP (1979) Evidence for direction-specific channels in the processing of frequency modulation. J Acoust Soc Am 66:704–709

  9. Grasse KL, Ariel M, Smith ID (1990) Direction-selective responses of units in the dorsal terminal nucleus of cat following intravitreal injections of bicuculline. Vis Neurosci 6:604–617

  10. Kay RH (1982) Hearing of modulation in sounds. Physiol Rev 62:894–975

  11. Kay RH, Matthews DR (1972) On the existence in human auditory pathways of channels selectively tuned to the modulation present in frequency-modulated tones. J Physiol (Lond) 225:657–677

  12. Mendelson JR (1992) Neural selectivity for interaural frequency disparity in cat primary auditory cortex. Hear Res 58:47–56

  13. Mendelson JR, Cynader MS (1985) Sensitivity of cat primary auditory cortex (AI) neurons to the direction and rate of frequency modulation. Brain Res 327:331–335

  14. Mendelson JR, Schreiner CE, Sutter ML, Grasse KL (1992) Functional topography of cat primary auditory cortex: responses to frequency modulated sweeps. Exp Brain Res (in press)

  15. Merzenich MM, Knight PL, Roth GL (1975) Representation of cochlea within primary auditory cortex in the cat. J Neurophysiol 38:231–249

  16. Moller AR (1974) Coding of sounds with rapidly varying spectrum in the cochlear nucleus. J Acoust Soc Am 55:631–640

  17. Moody DB, May B, Cole DM, Stebbins WC (1986) The role of frequency modulation in the perception of complex stimuli by primates. Exptal Biol 45:219–232

  18. Nabelek IV, Nabelek AK, Hirsh IJ (1970) Pitch of tone bursts of changing frequency. J Acoust Soc Am 48:536–553

  19. Nabelek IV, Nabelek AK, Hirsh IJ (1972) Pitch of sound bursts with continuous or discontinuous change of frequency. J Acoust Soc Am 53:1305–1312

  20. Nelson PG, Erulkar SD, Bryan JS (1966) Responses of units of the inferior colliculus to time-varying acoustic stimuli. J Neurophysiol 29:834–860

  21. Nomoto M (1980) Discharge patterns of the primary auditory cortex in cats. Jpn J Physiol 30:427–442

  22. Phillips DP, Mendelson JR, Cynader MS, Douglas RM (1985) Responses of single neurones in cat auditory cortex to time-varying stimuli: frequency-modulated tones of narrow excursion. Exp Brain Res 58:443–454

  23. Phillips DP, Hall SE (1987) Responses of single neurons in cat auditory cortex to time-varying stimuli: linear amplitude modulations. Exp Brain Res 67:479–492

  24. Pick GF (1979) A study of frequency transition in cat vocalization. J Acoust Soc Am 66:594–597

  25. Poon PWF, Chen X, Hwang JC (1991) Basic determinants for FM responses in the inferior colliculus of rats. Exp Brain Res 83:598–606

  26. Rees A, Moller AR (1983) Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rat to AM and FM tones. Hearing Res 10:301–330

  27. Regan D, Tansley BW (1979) Selective adaptation to frequency-modulated tones: Evidence for an information-processing channel selectively sensitive to frequency changes. J Acoust Soc Am 65:1249–1257

  28. Sachs MB, Kiang NYS (1968) Two-tone inhibition in auditory nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 43:1120–1128

  29. Sellick PM, Russell IJ (1979) Two tone suppression in cochlear hair cells. Hear Res 1:227–236

  30. Shore SE, Nuttall AL (1985) High-synchrony cochlear compound action potentials evoked by rising frequency-swept tone bursts. J Acoust Soc Am 78:1286–1295

  31. Shore SE, Clopton BM, Au YN (1987) Unit responses in ventral cochlear nucleus reflect cochlear coding of rapid frequency-sweeps. J Acoust Soc Am 82:471–478

  32. Sinex DG, Geisler CD (1981) Auditory-nerve fiber responses to frequency-modulated tones. Hearing Res 4:127–148

  33. Suga N (1965a) Functional properties of auditory neurones in the cortex of echo-locating bats. J Physiol (Lond) 181:671–700

  34. Suga N (1965b) Analysis of frequency modulated sounds by auditory neurons of echo-locating bats. J Physiol (Lond) 179:26–53

  35. Suga N (1968) Analysis of frequency-modulated and complex sounds by single auditory neurones of bats. J Physiol (Lond) 198:51–80

  36. Suga N (1969) Classification of inferior collicular neurones of bats in terms of responses to pure tones, FM sounds, and noise bursts. J Physiol 200:555–574

  37. Tansley BW, Regan D (1979) Separate auditory channels for unidirectional frequency modulation and unidirectional amplitude modulation. Sensory Proc 3:132–140

  38. Vartanian IA (1974) On mechanisms of specialized reactions of central auditory neurons to frequency-modulated sounds. Acustica 31:305–310

  39. Watanabe T (1972) Fundamental study of the neural mechanisms in cats subserving the feature extraction process of complex sounds. Jpn J Physiol 22:569–583

  40. Whitfield IC, Evans EF (1965) Responses of auditory cortical neurons to stimuli changing frequency. J Neurophysiol 28:655–672

  41. Whitfield IC, Purser D (1972) Microelectrode study of the medial geniculate body in unanesthetized free-moving cats. Brain Behav Evol 6:311–322

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mendelson, J.R., Grasse, K.L. A comparison of monaural and binaural responses to frequency modulated (FM) sweeps in cat primary auditory cortex. Exp Brain Res 91, 435–454 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227840

Download citation

Key words

  • Frequency modulated sweep
  • Binaural response
  • Primary auditory cortex
  • Direction selectivity
  • Speed selectivity
  • Cat