Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Reorientation of visually evoked postural responses by different eye-in-orbit and head-on-trunk angular positions

  • 108 Accesses

  • 22 Citations

Abstract

We examined the question of whether the position of the eyes in the head and of the head on the trunk influence the direction of visually elicited postural reactions. Normal subjects stood on a force platform viewing a large disc, rotating in the roll plane, always maintained orthogonal to the line of sight. The disc was presented at 0°, 30° and 90° to the right or left with respect to the mid-frontal plane of the subject's body and was viewed with various combinations of horizontal eye-in-orbit and head-on-trunk deviations. It was found that the main direction of body sway was always reoriented to be parallel to the disc (e.g. viewing the disc at 30° oriented sway responses at a mean angle of 33°). The largest sway responses were obtained when the disc was parallel to the sagittal plane of the body and was viewed with an ipsilateral eye-neck deviation totalling 90° (head-on-trunk 60°+eye-in-orbit 30°). When eye and head deviations cancelled each other (i.e. eye-in-orbit +30° combined with head-on-trunk -30°), directional effects on sway also cancelled each other out. This result demonstrates that signals of eye-in-orbit and head-on-trunk position have the capability to redirect visuo-motor commands to the appropriate postural muscles. This allows vision to regulate postural balance whatever the position of the eyes in space. We speculate that this function is mediated by eye and neck proprioceptive signals (or alternatively by efference copy) with access to gain control mechanisms in the visuo-postural system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allum JHJ, Pfaltz CR (1985) Visual and vestibular contributions to pitch sway stabilization in the ankle muscles of normals and patients with bilateral peripheral vestibular deficits. Exp Brain Res 58:82–94

  2. Baldissera F, Hultborn H, Illert M (1981) Integration in spinal neuronal systems In: Brooks VB (ed) Motor control. (Handbook of physiology, The nervous system, vol II) Am Physiol Soc, Bethesda, MD, Chap 12

  3. Bles W, Vianney de Jong JMB, Gert de Wit (1983) Compensation for labyrinthine defects examined by the use of a tilting room. Acta Otolaryngol 95:576–579

  4. Bronstein AM (1986) Suppression of visually evoked postural responses. Exp Brain Res 63:655–658

  5. Bronstein AM (1994) Visually induced body sway in patients with visual vertigo. In: Taguchi K, Igarashi M, Mori S (eds) Vestibular and neural front (Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Posture and Gait, Matsumoto, Japan, 1994) Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 569–572

  6. Clément G, Jacquin T, Berthoz A (1985) Habituation of postural readjustments induced by motion of visual scenes. In: Igarashi M, Black O (eds) Vestibular and visual control on posture and locomotor equilibrium. (Seventh Int. Symp. Int. Soc. Posturography), Houston, Tex. Karger, Basel, pp 99–104

  7. Dichgans J, Held R, Young LR, Brandt T (1972) Moving visual scenes influence the apparent direction of gravity. Science 178:1217–1219

  8. Dichgans J, Brandt T, Held R (1975) The role of vision in gravitational orientation. Fortschr Zool 23:255–263

  9. Diener HC, Dichgans J, Bacher M, Gompf B (1984) Quantification of postural sway in normals and patients with cerebral diseases. EEG Clin Neurophysiol 57:134–142

  10. Dietz V, Schubert M, Discher M, Trippel M (1994) Influence of visuoproprioceptive mismatch on postural adjustments. Gait Posture 2:147–155

  11. Lee DN, Lishman JR (1975) Visual proprioceptive control of stance. J Hum Mov Studies 1:87–95

  12. Lestienne F, Soechting J, Berthoz A (1977) Postural Readjustments induced by linear motion of visual scenes. Exp Brain Res 28:363–384

  13. Nakamura T, Bronstein AM (1995) The perception of head and neck angular displacement in normal and labyrinthine-defective subjects. Brain 118:1157–1168

  14. Nashner L, Berthoz A (1978) Visual contribution to rapid motor responses during postural control. Brain Res 150:403–407

  15. Previc FH, Mullen TJ (1991) A comparison of the latencies of visually induced postural change and self-motion perception. J Vestib Res 1:317–323

  16. Roll JP, Vedel JP, Roll R (1989) Eye, head and skeletal muscle spindle feedback in the elaboration of body references. Prog Brain Res 80:113–123

  17. Timmann D, Belting C, Schwarz M, Diener HC (1994) Influence of visual and somatosensory input on the leg EMG responses in dynamic posturography in normals. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 93:7–14

  18. Wicke RW, Oman CM (1982) Visual and graviceptive influences on the lower leg EMG activity in humans during brief falls. Exp Brain Res 46:324–330

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolsley, C.J., Sakellari, V. & Bronstein, A.M. Reorientation of visually evoked postural responses by different eye-in-orbit and head-on-trunk angular positions. Exp Brain Res 111, 283–288 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227305

Download citation

Key words

  • Posture
  • Proprioception
  • Ocular
  • Visual
  • Spatial orientation
  • Human