Skip to main content
Log in

Additional value of US to mammography: profit and loss

  • Original Articles
  • Breast imaging
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine the additional value of US to mammograpln in benign and malignant breast pathology three observers scored on a five-point scale the mammograms retrospectively of 18 1 breast lesions consisting of 58 benion cystic lesions, 48 solid benign lesions and 75 malignant lesions. Subsequently, the sono,,rams were added and a second score followed. The scores were compared with the final diagnosis. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROCS) and x values for interobserrver variability were calculated, and with the differences between the mammogram scores and the sonogram scores a “profit-and-loss account” was designed. The ROCS showed the best performance after adding the sonograms, but the difference was not significant. On the basis of the profit-and-loss account the diagnostic performance could be analysed as profit in improved detection and loss in a downswing. In the category of benign cystic lesions the profit of US was 14.2 % and the loss was 1.1 %. In the category of benign solid lesions the profit was 1.3 % Because of an increase in false-positive malignant diagnoses US led to a loss of 10.1 % In the malignant lesions US led to a profit of 10.2% and a loss of 0.8 % In conclusion. US acids valuable additional information to the diagnosis of malignancies, but is a source of confusion in benign solid lesions. Its unreliability in the differentiation between solid benign and malignant lesions necessitates systematic application of fine-needle-aspiration cytology as a reliable diagnostic procedure in breast lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jackson VP (1990) The role of US in breast imaging. Radiology 177:305–311

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bassett LW, Kimme-Smith C (1991) Breast ultrasound. AJR 156:449–455

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jokich PM, Monticciolo DL, Adler YT (1992) Breast ultrasonography. Radiol Clin North Am 30: 993–1008

    Google Scholar 

  4. Donegan WL (1992) Evaluation of a palpable breast mass. N Engl J Med 327: 937–942

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fajardo LL, Jackson VP, Hunter TB (1992) Interventional procedures in diseases of the breast: needle biopsy, pneumocystography, and galactography. AJR 158:1231–1238

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fornage BD, Coan JD, David CL (1992) Ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the breast and other interventional procedures. Radiol Clin North Am 30:167–185

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tabar L, Dean PB (1983) Teaching atlas of mammography, 2nd edn. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oestmann J-W, Galanski M (1989) ROC: Methodik zum Vergleich der diagnostischen Leistung bildgebender Verfahren. Fortschr Röntgenstr 151: 87–90

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ker M (1990) Issues in the use of kappa. Invest Radiol 26: 78–83

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sickles EA, Filly RA, Callen PW (1983) Breast cancer detection with ultrasound and mammography: comparison using state-of-the-art equipment. AJR 140: 843–845

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fornage BD, Lorigan JG, Andry E (1989) Fibroadenoma of the breast: sonographic appearance. Radiology 172: 671–675

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris KM, Ilkhanipour ZS, Ganott MA (1992) Vertically oriented solid breast mass: a predictor of malignancy at sonography. Radiology 185 (P): 112

    Google Scholar 

  13. Feig SA (1992) Breast masses. Mammographic and sonographic evaluation. Radiol Clin North Am 30: 67–92

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hilton SW, Leopold GR, Olson LK, Wilson SA (1986) Realtime breast ultrasound: application in 300 consecutive patients. AJR 147: 479–486

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vining DJ, Gladish GW (1986) Receiver operating characteristic curves: a basic understanding. Radiographics 12: 1147–1154

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rizzatto G, Chersevani R, Solbiati L (1993) High-resolution ultrasound assists in breast diagnosis. Diagn Imaging Int May: 42–45

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zonderland, H.M., Hermans, J., Holscher, H.C. et al. Additional value of US to mammography: profit and loss. Eur. Radiol. 4, 511–516 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226821

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226821

Key words

Navigation