Abstract
To determine the additional value of US to mammograpln in benign and malignant breast pathology three observers scored on a five-point scale the mammograms retrospectively of 18 1 breast lesions consisting of 58 benion cystic lesions, 48 solid benign lesions and 75 malignant lesions. Subsequently, the sono,,rams were added and a second score followed. The scores were compared with the final diagnosis. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROCS) and x values for interobserrver variability were calculated, and with the differences between the mammogram scores and the sonogram scores a “profit-and-loss account” was designed. The ROCS showed the best performance after adding the sonograms, but the difference was not significant. On the basis of the profit-and-loss account the diagnostic performance could be analysed as profit in improved detection and loss in a downswing. In the category of benign cystic lesions the profit of US was 14.2 % and the loss was 1.1 %. In the category of benign solid lesions the profit was 1.3 % Because of an increase in false-positive malignant diagnoses US led to a loss of 10.1 % In the malignant lesions US led to a profit of 10.2% and a loss of 0.8 % In conclusion. US acids valuable additional information to the diagnosis of malignancies, but is a source of confusion in benign solid lesions. Its unreliability in the differentiation between solid benign and malignant lesions necessitates systematic application of fine-needle-aspiration cytology as a reliable diagnostic procedure in breast lesions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jackson VP (1990) The role of US in breast imaging. Radiology 177:305–311
Bassett LW, Kimme-Smith C (1991) Breast ultrasound. AJR 156:449–455
Jokich PM, Monticciolo DL, Adler YT (1992) Breast ultrasonography. Radiol Clin North Am 30: 993–1008
Donegan WL (1992) Evaluation of a palpable breast mass. N Engl J Med 327: 937–942
Fajardo LL, Jackson VP, Hunter TB (1992) Interventional procedures in diseases of the breast: needle biopsy, pneumocystography, and galactography. AJR 158:1231–1238
Fornage BD, Coan JD, David CL (1992) Ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the breast and other interventional procedures. Radiol Clin North Am 30:167–185
Tabar L, Dean PB (1983) Teaching atlas of mammography, 2nd edn. Thieme, Stuttgart
Oestmann J-W, Galanski M (1989) ROC: Methodik zum Vergleich der diagnostischen Leistung bildgebender Verfahren. Fortschr Röntgenstr 151: 87–90
Ker M (1990) Issues in the use of kappa. Invest Radiol 26: 78–83
Sickles EA, Filly RA, Callen PW (1983) Breast cancer detection with ultrasound and mammography: comparison using state-of-the-art equipment. AJR 140: 843–845
Fornage BD, Lorigan JG, Andry E (1989) Fibroadenoma of the breast: sonographic appearance. Radiology 172: 671–675
Harris KM, Ilkhanipour ZS, Ganott MA (1992) Vertically oriented solid breast mass: a predictor of malignancy at sonography. Radiology 185 (P): 112
Feig SA (1992) Breast masses. Mammographic and sonographic evaluation. Radiol Clin North Am 30: 67–92
Hilton SW, Leopold GR, Olson LK, Wilson SA (1986) Realtime breast ultrasound: application in 300 consecutive patients. AJR 147: 479–486
Vining DJ, Gladish GW (1986) Receiver operating characteristic curves: a basic understanding. Radiographics 12: 1147–1154
Rizzatto G, Chersevani R, Solbiati L (1993) High-resolution ultrasound assists in breast diagnosis. Diagn Imaging Int May: 42–45
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zonderland, H.M., Hermans, J., Holscher, H.C. et al. Additional value of US to mammography: profit and loss. Eur. Radiol. 4, 511–516 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226821
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226821