Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Electromagnetic methods of turbulence measurements — shortcomings and advantage

  • 41 Accesses

Abstract

Two major electromagnetic methods of turbulence measurements are discussed. Both methods are based on the measurement of the electrical field induced by the fluid motion in the presence of a magnetic field. In the first method a multielectrode potential difference probe (PDP) is used in the presence of an external magnetic field, while in the second one the source of the magnetic field is incorporated in the probe itself and the magnetic field is strongly localized around the probe. Shortcomings and advantages of both methods are discussed along with recent developments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baker, R. C. 1971: On the electromagnetic vortex probe. J. Phys. E4, 99–101

  2. Grossman, L. M.; Li, H.; Einstein, H. 1957: Turbulence in civil engineering. Investigation of liquid shear flow by electromagnetic induction. Proc. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. J. Hydr. Div. 83, 1–15

  3. Kit, L. G. 1970: Turbulent velocity fluctuation measurements using a conduction anemometer with three-electrode probe. Magnetohydrodynamics 6, 480–487.

  4. Kolesnikov, Yu. B.; Tsinober, A. B. 1972: Two dimensional turbulent flow behind a circular cylinder. Magnetohydrodynamics 8, 300–307

  5. Müller, S. F.; Thun, G. 1977: Permanentmagnetische Durchfluß-messer-Sonde für flüssige Metalle, Institut für Reaktorbauelemente, Karlsruhe, KFK 2479

  6. Ricou, R.; Vives, C. 1982: Local velocity and mass transfer measurement in molten metals using an incorporated magnet probe. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 25, 1579–1588

  7. Shercliff, J. A. 1962: The theory of electromagnetic flow measurement, pp. 88–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  8. Tsinober, A.; Kit, E.; Teitel, M. 1987: On the relevance of the potential difference method for turbulence measurements. J. Fluid Mech. 175, 447–461

  9. Von Weissenfluh, T. 1985: Probes for local velocity and temperature measurements in liquid metal flow. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 28, 1563–1574

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsinober, A., Kit, E. & Teitel, M. Electromagnetic methods of turbulence measurements — shortcomings and advantage. Experiments in Fluids 6, 44–48 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226133

Download citation

Keywords

  • Magnetic Field
  • External Magnetic Field
  • Fluid Motion
  • Difference Probe
  • Electromagnetic Method