Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The analysis of the NSW wheat variety database. I. Modelling trial error variance

Abstract

The retrospective analysis of a large database on wheat variety testing in New South Wales (NSW) is considered. This analysis involved three key steps. Initially error variance heterogeneity is modelled, indicating significant differences in error variance due to trial location, year of trialling, sowing date and trial mean yield. The implication of this modelling for the estimaion of variance components is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aitken MA (1987) Modelling variance heterogeneity in normal regression using GLIM. Appl Stat 36:332–339

  2. Atkinson AC (1985) Plots, transformations and regressions. Clarendon, Oxford

  3. Box GEP, Meyer RD (1986) Dispersion effects from fractional designs. Technometrics 28:19–27

  4. Brandle JE, McVetty PBE (1988) Genotype x environment interaction and stability analysis of seed yield of oilseed rape grown in Manitoba. Can J Plant Sci 68:381–388

  5. Brennan JP (1988) An economic investigation of wheat breeding programmes. Agricultural Economics Bulletin No. 35. Department of Agricultural Economics and Business Management, University of New England, Australia

  6. Brennan PS, Byth DE (1979) Genotype x environment interactions in wheat yields and selection for widely adapted wheat genotypes. J Agric Sci 30:221–232

  7. Brennan PS, Shepherd JA (1985) Retrospective assessment of environments in the determination of an objective strategy for the evaluation of the relative yield of wheat cultivars. Euphytica 34:397–408

  8. Brennan PS, Byth DE, Drake DW, De Lacy IH, Butler DG (1981) Determination of the location and number of test environments for a wheat cultivar evaluation programme. Euphytica 32:183–201

  9. Byth DE, Eisemann RL, De Lacy IH (1976) Two-way pattern analysis of a large data set to evaluate genotypic adaptation. Heredity 37:215–230

  10. Carroll RJ, Cline DBH (1988) An asymptotic theory for weighted least squares with weights estimated by replication. Biometrika 75:35–44

  11. Carroll RJ, Ruppert D (1989) Transformation and weighting in regression. Chapman and Hall, New York

  12. Cochran WG, Cox GM (1957) Experimental designs, 2nd edn. Wiley Press, New York

  13. Cullis BR, Gleeson AC (1989) Efficiency of neighbour analysis for replicated field trials in Australia. J Agric Sci 113:233–239

  14. Cullis BR, Gleeson AC (1991) Spatial analysis of field experiments — an extension to two dimensions. Biometrics 47:1449–1460

  15. Finlay KW, Wilkinson GN (1963) The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeeding programme. Aust J Agric Res 14:742–754

  16. Foulley JL, San Cristobal M, Gianola D, Im S (1992) Marginal likelihood and Bayesian approaches to the analysis of heterogeneous residual variances in mixed linear Gaussian models. Comput Stat Data Anal 13:291–305

  17. Gauch HG (1988) Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics 44:705–715

  18. Gilmour AR, Thompson R, Cullis BR (1996) AI, an efficient algorithm for REML estimation in linear mixed models. Biometrics (in press)

  19. Gleeson AC, Cullis BR (1987) Residual maximum likelihood (REML) estimation of a neighbour model for field experiments. Biometrics 43:277–288

  20. Gollob HF (1968) A statistical model which combines features of factor analytic and analysis of variance techniques. Psychometrica 33:73–115

  21. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London

  22. Mungomery VE, Shorter R, Byth DE (1974) Genotype x environment interactions and environmental adaptation. I. Pattern analysis-application to soya bean populations. Aust J Agric Res 25:59–72

  23. Nachit MM, Nachit G, Ketata H, Gauch HG Jr, Zobel RW (1992) Use of AMMI and linear regression models to analyse genotype x environment interaction in durum wheat. Theor Appl Genet 83:597–601

  24. Patterson HD, Thompson R (1971) Recovery of interblock information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 31:100–109

  25. Patterson HD, Silvey V, Talbot M, Weatherup STC (1977) Variability of yields of cereal varieties in UK trials. J Agric Sci 89:238–245

  26. Seif E, Evans JC, Balaam LN (1979) A multivariate procedure for classifying environments according to their interaction with genotypes. Aust J Agric Res 30:1021–1026

  27. Smyth GK (1989) Generalized linear models with varying dispersion. J R Stat Soc Ser B 51:47–60

  28. Talbot M (1984) Yield availability of crop varieties in the UK. J Agric Sci 102:315–321

  29. Thomson NJ, Cunningham RB (1979) Genotype x environment interactions and evaluation of cotton cultivars. Aust J Agric Res 30:105–112

  30. Verbyla AP (1993) Modelling variance heterogeneity: residual maximum likelihood and diagnostics. J R Stat Soc Ser B 55:493–508

  31. Wilkinson GN, Eckert SR, Hancock TW, Mayo O (1983) Nearest neighbour (NN) analysis of field experiments. J R Stat Soc Ser B 45:151–211

  32. Williams ER, Luckett DJ, Reid AE, Thomson NJ (1992) Comparison of locations used in cotton breeding trials. Aust J Exp Agric 32:739–746

  33. Yates F, Cochran WG (1938) The analysis of groups of experiments. J Exp Sci 28:556–580

  34. Zobel RW, Wright MJ, Gauch HG Jr (1988) Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agron J 80:388–393

Download references

Author information

Additional information

Communicated by G. Wenzel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cullis, B.R., Thomson, F.M., Fisher, J.A. et al. The analysis of the NSW wheat variety database. I. Modelling trial error variance. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 92, 21–27 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222947

Download citation

Key words

  • Genotype-by-environment interaction
  • Variance heterogeneity