Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Binocular depth perception mechanisms in tongue-projecting salamanders

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tongue-projecting salamanders (Bolitoglossini) combine extreme speed and high precision in prey capture. They possess all requirements for stereoscopic depth perception: frontally oriented eyes, a substantial amount of direct ipsilateral projection in addition to the contralateral one, and binocularly driven neurons. Extracellular recordings were made from retinal afferents in the tectum as well as from the somata of tectal neurons. RF-sizes of afferents and tectal neurons were determined, and the response properties of tectal neurons were tested under monocular and binocular conditions with stimuli of different size and velocity. While RF-sizes and response properties of binocular neurons during binocular and contralateral stimulation were similar, ipsilaterally stimulated neurons exhibited much smaller RFs, lower spike rates and different size preferences.

Furthermore, the contralateral retinotectal projection from one eye and the ipsilateral from the other are in register. While retinal afferents are distributed linearly over the tectal surface, most tectal neurons are activated by a retinal area corresponding to the frontal visual field; this results in a magnification of this region. The two monocular receptive fields of binocular neurons exhibit zero disparities (horopter) at distances that coincide with the maximum reach of the tongue. We hypothesize that bolitoglossine salamanders (as well as amphibians in general) make use of two kinds of disparities: (1) between the maps in the left and right tectal hemisphere, coding for the lateral eccentricity of an object, and (2) between the ipsilateral and contralateral retinotectal map, coding for the distance. The presence of substantial direct ipsilateral afferents in bolitoglossine salamanders appears to be the basis for a fast computation of object distance, which is characteristic of these animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Ax/Ay :

coordinates of a recorded afference

Nx/Ny :

coordinates of a recorded neuron

RF :

receptive field

RFc :

contralateral receptive field

RFi :

ipsilateral receptive field

RFx/RFy :

coordinates of a receptive field center

RGC :

retinal ganglion cell

References

  • Bousfield JD, Pessoa VF (1980) Changes in ganglion cell density during the post-metamorphotic development in neotropical frog Hyla raniceps. Vision Res 20: 501–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett TS (1977) Stereopsis in toads. Nature 267: 349–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas RH, Collett TS, Wagner HJ (1986) Accommodation in anuran Amphibia and its role in depth vision. J Comp Physiol A 158: 133–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop SA, Beazley LD (1981) Changing retinal ganglion cell distribution in the frog Heleioporus eyrei. J Comp Neurol 202: 221–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurich C, Roth G, Schwegler H, Wiggers W (1995) Simulander: A neural network model for the orientation movement of salamanders. J Comp Physiol A 176: 379–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch DJ, Collett TS (1983) Small-field binocular neurons in the superficial layers of the frog optic tectum. Proc R Soc London B 217: 491–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkenstaedt T, Ewert JP (1983) Processing of area dimensions of visual key stimuli by tectal neurons in Salamandra salamandra. J Comp Physiol 153: 85–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsch B (1980) Retinal projections in European Salamandridae. Cell Tissue Res 213: 325–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard J (1985) Binocularly driven neurons in the rostral part of the frog optic tectum. J Comp Physiol A 157: 47–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard F, Galand G (1977) New ipsilateral visual units in the frog tectum. Brain Res 136: 351–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobstein P (1988) Between the retinotectal projection and directed movement: Topography of a sensorimotor interface. Brain Behav Evol 31: 34–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobstein P, Comer C (1983) The nucleus isthmi as an intertectal relay for the ipsilateral oculotectal projection in the frog, Rana pipiens. J Comp Neurol 217: 54–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruberg ER (1972) Optic fiber projections in the tiger salamander Ambystoma tigrinum. J Hirnforsch 14: 399–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruberg ER, Udin SB (1978) Topographic projections between the nucleus isthmi and the tectum of the frog Rana pipiens. J Comp Neurol 179: 487–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan M, Luthardt G, Meyer-Naujoks C, Roth G (1980) The role of eye accommodation in the depth perception of common toads. Z Naturforsch 35C: 851–852

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebmann PA, Entine G (1968) Visual pigments of frog and tadpole (Rana pipiens). Vision Res 8: 761–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Linke R, Roth G (1988) Neuroglial cells and axons in the optic nerve of lungless salamanders (Fam. Plethodontidae) In: Elsner N, Barth FG (eds) Sense organs. Thieme Stuttgart, p 255

    Google Scholar 

  • Linke R, Roth G (1990) Optic nerves in plethodontid salamanders (Amphibia, Urodela): neuroglia, fiber spectrum and myelination. Anat Embryol 181: 37–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Linke R, Roth G, Rottluff B (1986) Comparative studies on the eye morphology in lungless salamanders, family Plethodontidae, and the effect of miniaturization. J Morphol 189: 131–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthardt-Laimer G (1981) Distance estimation in binocular and monocular salamanders. Z Tierpsychol 63: 233–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Manteuffel G, Fox B, Roth G (1989) Topographic relationships of ipsi- and contralateral visual inputs to the rostral tectum opticum in the salamander Plethodon jordani indicate the presence of a horopter. Neurosci Lett 107: 105–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana HR (1959) Number of fibers in the optic nerve and the number of ganglion cells in the retina of anurans. Nature 183: 1406–1407

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen VS, Straznicky C (1989) The development and the topographic organization of the retinal ganglion cell layer in Bufo marinus. Exp Brain Res 75: 345–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew JD (1965) A study of binocular interaction in single units of the striate cortex of the cat. Thesis, University of Sidney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew JD (1979) Binocular visual processing in the owl's telencephalon. Proc R Soc Lond B 204: 435–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew JD, Konishi M (1976) Neurons selective for orientation and binocular disparity in the visual wulst of the barn owl (Tyto alba). Science 193: 675–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Picouet MJ, Clairambault P (1976) Une nouvelle voie visuelle chez un amphibien anoure, Discoglossus pictus. C R Acad Sci (Paris) 282: 16–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggio GF, Fisher B (1977) Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol 40: 1392–1405

    Google Scholar 

  • Porciatti V, Fontanesi G, Raffaelli A, Bagnola P (1990) Binocularity in the little owl, Athene noctua. Brain Behav Evol 35: 40–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettig G (1984) Neuroanatomische Untersuchungen der visuellen Projektionen bei Salamandern (Ordnung Caudata). Thesis, Universität Bremen

  • Rettig G (1988) Connections of the tectum opticum in two urodeles, Salamandra salamandra and Bolitoglossa subpalmata, with special reference to the nucleus isthmi. J Hirnforsch 29: 5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettig G, Roth G (1982) Afferent visual projections in three species of lungless salamanders (Family Plethodontidae). Neurosci Lett 31: 221–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettig G, Roth G (1986) Retinofugal projections in salamanders of the family Plethodontidae. Cell Tissue Res 243: 285–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossel S (1986) Binocular spatial localization in the praying mantis. J Exp Biol 120: 265–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth G (1976) Experimental analysis of the prey catching behavior of Hydromantes italicus Dunn (Amphibia, Plethodontidae). J Comp Physiol 109: 47–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth G (1987) Visual behavior in salamanders. Springer Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth G, Naujoks-Manteuffel C, Grunwald W (1990) Cytoarchitecture of the tectum mesencephali in salamanders: A Golgi and HRP study. J Comp Neurol 291: 27–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth G, Rottluff B, Grunwald W, Hanken J, Linke R (1990) Miniaturization in plethodontid salamanders (Caudata: Plethodontidae) and its consequences for the brain and visual system. Biol J Linnean Soc 40: 165–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Straub A (1993) Mathematische Modelle für das visuomotorische Verhalten von Amphibien. Thesis, Universität Bremen

  • Thexton AJ, Wake DB, Wake MH (1977) Tongue function in the salamander Bolitoglossa occidentalis. Arch Oral Biol 22: 361–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner C (1983) Zielorientierung im Beutefangverhalten des Feuersalamanders Salamandra salamandra L. Thesis, Technische Hochschule Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggers W (1991) Elektrophysiologische, neuroanatomische und verhaltensphysiologische Untersuchungen zur visuellen Verhaltenssteuerung bei lungenlosen Salamandern. Thesis, Universität Bremen

  • Wong ROL (1989) Morphology and distribution of neurons in the retina of the American garter snake Thamnophis sirtalis. J Comp Neurol 283: 587–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Straznicky C (1991) The morphology and distribution of photoreceptors in the retina of Bufo marinus. Anat Embryol 183: 97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu BS, Hiscock J, Straznicky C (1990) The changing distribution of neurons in the inner nuclear layer from metamorphosis to adult: a morphometric analysis of the anuran retina. Anat Embryol 181: 585–594

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Hirnforschung,Universität Bremen, FB2, D-28334, Bremen, Germany

    W. Wiggers & G. Roth

  2. Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Bremen, D-28334, Bremen, Germany

    C. Eurich & A. Straub

Authors
  1. W. Wiggers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Roth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Eurich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Straub
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiggers, W., Roth, G., Eurich, C. et al. Binocular depth perception mechanisms in tongue-projecting salamanders. J Comp Physiol A 176, 365–377 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00219062

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00219062

Key words

Search

Navigation