Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Comparison of microbial tests for the detection of heavy metal genotoxicity

  • 150 Accesses

  • 37 Citations

Abstract

Heavy metal genotoxicity was evaluated by using different microbial tests. Four genotoxicity assays were employed: the Ames test, the E. coli WP2 test, the Mutatox test detecting mutagenicity, and the SOS assay with E. coli-detecting enzyme induction. All the metals tested (cadmium, chromium, copper, mercury, nickel, and zinc) were detected as genotoxic by the Mutatox and the SOS tests. The Ames test and the E. coli WP2 assay only detected chromium as genotoxic, causing a mutagenic effect. The sensitivity to metals of all the assays used was maintained when they were dissolved in sewage, although there was a slight increase in the sensitivity thresholds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ames BN, Durston WE, Yamasaki E, Lee FD (1973a) Carcinogens are mutagens: A simple test system combining liver homogenates for activation and bacteria for detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci 70(8):2281–2285

  2. Ames BN, Lee FD, Durston WE (1973b) An improved bacterial test system for the detection and classification of mutagens and carcinogens. Proc Nat Acad Sci 70(3):782–786

  3. Ames BN, McCann J, Yamasaki E (1975) Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian microsome mutagenicity test. Mutat Res 31:347–364

  4. Baker RSU (1984) Evaluation of metals in vitro assays, interpretation of data and possible mechanisms of action. Toxic Environ Chem 7(3):185–206

  5. Codina JC, Pérez-García A, Romero P, de Vicente A (1993) A comparison of microbial bioassays for the detection of metal toxicity. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 25:250–254

  6. Degraeve N (1981) Carcinogenic, teratogenic and mutagenic effect of cadmium. Mutat Res 86:115–135

  7. Eichhorn GL (1975) Active sites of biological macromolecules and their interaction with heavy metals. In: McIntyre AD, Mills CF (eds) Ecological toxicology research: Effects of heavy metal and organohalogen compounds. Plenum Press, NY, pp 123–142

  8. Eisler R, Hennekey RJ (1977) Acute toxicity of Cd2–, Cr2–, Hg2–, Ni2–, and Zn2– to estuarine macrofauna. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 7:315–323

  9. Furst A, Radding SB (1984) New developments in the study of metal carcinogenesis. J Environ Sci Health C2(1):103–133

  10. Gadd GM, Griffiths AJ (1978) Microorganisms and heavy metal toxicity. Microb Ecol 4:303–317

  11. Hansen K, Stern RM (1984) A survey of metal-induced mutagenicity in vitro and in vivo. Toxicol Environ Chem 7(3):207–211

  12. IARC, suppl. 7 (1987) IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, overall evaluations of carcinogenicity, an updating of IARC monographs from vols. 1–42, Int. Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon

  13. Ichikura T, Doyama Y, Maeda M (1970) On the effects of various heavy metals on growth and yield of rice and onion. Bull Osaka Agric Res Cent 7:33–41

  14. Kazantzis G (1984) Mutagenic and carcinogenic effects of cadmium. Tox Environ Chem 8:387–398

  15. Llagostera M, Garrido S, Guerrero R, Barbé J (1986) Induction of SOS genes of Escherichia coli by chromium compounds. Environ Mutagen 8:571–577

  16. Maron D, Ames B (1983) Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutat Res 112:173–215

  17. Marzin DR, Vo Phi H (1985) Study of the mutagenicity of metals derivatives with Salmonella typhimurium TA102. Mutat Res 155:49–51

  18. Miller JM (1972) Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, NY

  19. Mohn GR (1981) Bacterial systems for carcinogenicity testing. Mutat Res 87:191–210

  20. Purchase IFH (1982) An appraisal of predictive tests for carcinogenicity. Mutat Res 99:53–71

  21. Quillardet P, Hofnung M (1985) The SOS Chromotest, a colorimetric bacterial assay for genotoxins: Procedures. Mutat Res 147:65–78

  22. Quillardet P, Hofnung M (1988) The screening, diagnosis and evaluation of genotoxic agents with batteries of bacterial tests. Mutat Res 205:107–118

  23. Schuetzle D, Lewtas J (1986) Bioassay-directed chemical analysis in environmental research. Anal Chem 58:1060A-1075A

  24. Venitt S, Crofton-Sleigh C, Forster R (1984) Bacterial mutation assays using reverse mutation. In: Venitt S, Parry JM (eds) Mutagenicity testing: A practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford, pp 45–97

  25. Venitt S, Bartsch H, Becking G, Fuchs RPP, Hofnung M, Malaveille C, Matsushima T, Rajewsky MR, Roberfroid M, Rosenkranz HS (1986) Short-term assays using bacteria. In: Montesano R, Bartsch H, Vainio H, Wilburn J, Yamasaki H (eds) Long-term and short-term assays for carcinogens: A critical appraisal. Lyon, IARC Sci Publ No 83, pp 143–161

  26. Wang YY, Flessel CP, Williams LR, Chang K, DiBartolomeis MJ, Simmons B, Singer H, Sun S (1987) Evaluation of guidelines for preparing wastewater samples for Ames testing. In: Sandhu SS, DeMarini D, Mass MJ, More MM, Mumford JL (eds) Short-term bioassays in the analysis of environmental mixtures V. Plenum Press, NY, pp 67–87

  27. Wong PK (1988) Mutagenicity of heavy metals. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 40:597–603

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to A. de Vicente.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Codina, J.C., Pérez-Torrente, C., Pérez-García, A. et al. Comparison of microbial tests for the detection of heavy metal genotoxicity. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 29, 260–265 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00212978

Download citation

Keywords

  • Enzyme
  • Copper
  • Zinc
  • Nickel
  • Heavy Metal